U.S. Agencies Issue New Security Warning for Chemical Culprit In Texas Explosion

Douglas P. Guarino, Global Security Newswire
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Douglas P. Guarino, Global Security Newswire
Sept. 3, 2013, 10:02 a.m.

WASH­ING­TON — Three fed­er­al agen­cies on Fri­day is­sued a new se­cur­ity warn­ing for the ex­plos­ive chem­ic­al be­lieved to have triggered an April dis­aster the in West, Texas – prompt­ing praise from a key sen­at­or.

The ad­vis­ory, is­sued by the U.S. En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency, Oc­cu­pa­tion­al Safety and Health Ad­min­is­tra­tion and Bur­eau of Al­co­hol, To­bacco, Fire­arms and Ex­plos­ives, per­tains to am­moni­um ni­trate, which is be­lieved to have been stored in sig­ni­fic­ant quant­it­ies at the Texas fer­til­izer plant that ex­ploded, lev­el­ing homes and killing 14 people.

EPA of­fi­cials said in a state­ment that the alert “provides les­sons learned for fa­cil­ity own­ers and op­er­at­ors, emer­gency plan­ners and first re­spon­ders from re­cent in­cid­ents,” in­clud­ing the April tragedy.

Dur­ing a con­gres­sion­al hear­ing on the in­cid­ent in June, Sen­at­or Bar­bara Box­er (D-Cal­if.) slammed EPA of­fi­cials for what she said was a lack of ac­tion aimed at pro­tect­ing the pub­lic from do­mest­ic-chem­ic­al threats. In par­tic­u­lar, Box­er, who chairs the Sen­ate En­vir­on­ment and Pub­lic Works Com­mit­tee, cri­ti­cized the agency for not hav­ing is­sued an alert on am­moni­um ni­trate since 1997.

In a state­ment on Fri­day, Box­er said she was “very grate­ful” the ad­min­is­tra­tion is­sued the up­date.

“After the ter­rible ex­plo­sion in West, which took the lives of at least 14 people in­clud­ing first re­spon­ders, I pledged that the EPW Com­mit­tee would fo­cus on how to pre­vent such need­less tra­gedies in the fu­ture,” Box­er said. “If am­moni­um ni­trate is stored safely or if al­tern­at­ives are used, ex­plo­sions could have been pre­ven­ted in the past and more ex­plo­sions could be pre­ven­ted in the fu­ture.”

EPA of­fi­cials have yet to is­sue new rules on chem­ic­al risk man­age­ment, which Box­er said dur­ing the June hear­ing had been re­com­men­ded by a 2002 U.S. Chem­ic­al Safety Board re­port, and for which labor and en­vir­on­ment­al groups have since pe­ti­tioned the agency.

Pres­id­ent Obama in Au­gust did, however, sign an ex­ec­ut­ive or­der dir­ect­ing the Home­land Se­cur­ity, Labor and Ag­ri­cul­ture sec­ret­ar­ies to “de­vel­op a list of po­ten­tial reg­u­lat­ory and le­gis­lat­ive pro­pos­als to im­prove the safe and se­cure stor­age, hand­ling, and sale of am­moni­um ni­trate.” The or­der also called on EPA and OSHA of­fi­cials to re­view wheth­er their chem­ic­al risk-man­age­ment pro­grams should cov­er ad­di­tion­al chem­ic­als.

The pres­id­en­tial dir­ect­ive also ad­dressed the is­sue of so-called “out­lier” fa­cil­it­ies that, like the Texas fa­cil­ity, the Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment failed to reg­u­late un­der its Chem­ic­al Fa­cil­ity Anti-Ter­ror­ism Stand­ards. The or­der es­tab­lished a chem­ic­al fa­cil­ity safety and se­cur­ity work­ing group, through which sev­er­al fed­er­al agen­cies are ex­pec­ted to work to­geth­er to im­prove their co­ordin­a­tion with state and loc­al gov­ern­ments.

What We're Following See More »
NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
COMMISSIONERS NEED TO DELIBERATE MORE
FCC Pushes Vote on Set-Top Boxes
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Federal regulators on Thursday delayed a vote on a proposal to reshape the television market by freeing consumers from cable box rentals, putting into doubt a plan that has pitted technology companies against cable television providers. ... The proposal will still be considered for a future vote. But Tom Wheeler, chairman of the F.C.C., said commissioners needed more discussions."

Source:
UNTIL DEC. 9, ANYWAY
Obama Signs Bill to Fund Government
7 hours ago
THE LATEST
REDSKINS IMPLICATIONS
SCOTUS to Hear Case on Offensive Trademarks
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The Supreme Court is taking up a First Amendment clash over the government’s refusal to register offensive trademarks, a case that could affect the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name. The justices agreed Thursday to hear a dispute involving an Asian-American rock band called the Slants, but they did not act on a separate request to hear the higher-profile Redskins case at the same time." Still, any precedent set by the case could have ramifications for the Washington football team.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Bannon Still Collecting Royalties from ‘Seinfeld’
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Hollywood Reporter takes a look at a little-known intersection of politics and entertainment, in which Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon is still raking in residuals from Seinfeld. Here's the digest version: When Seinfeld was in its infancy, Ted Turner was in the process of acquiring its production company, Castle Rock, but he was under-capitalized. Bannon's fledgling media company put up the remaining funds, and he agreed to "participation rights" instead of a fee. "Seinfeld has reaped more than $3 billion in its post-network afterlife through syndication deals." Meanwhile, Bannon is "still cashing checks from Seinfeld, and observers say he has made nearly 25 times more off the Castle Rock deal than he had anticipated."

Source:
×