Boehner Stands With Obama On Syria, But Not Too Close

The House speaker won’t whip the GOP caucus, and isn’t worried about the “Hastert Rule.”

Tea Leaves: Democrats question whether Boehner will rein in tea partiers.
National Journal
Patrick Reis
Sept. 3, 2013, 11:16 a.m.

John Boehner has de­cided: He’ll vote to ap­prove Pres­id­ent Obama’s re­quest for au­thor­ity to launch a mil­it­ary strike against Syr­ia, but that’s about all the help he’s pre­pared to provide.

In­stead, the House speak­er is put­ting the onus on Obama, say­ing the pres­id­ent alone is re­spons­ible for win­ning the votes he needs to au­thor­ize mil­it­ary ac­tion.

“It is the pres­id­ent’s re­spons­ib­il­ity to make his case to the Amer­ic­an people and their elec­ted rep­res­ent­at­ives,” Mi­chael Steel, a spokes­man for Boehner, said Tues­day. “Every­one un­der­stands that it is an up­hill battle to pass a res­ol­u­tion, and the speak­er ex­pects the White House to provide an­swers to mem­bers’ ques­tions and take the lead on any whip­ping ef­fort.”

And while Boehner has asked his Re­pub­lic­an caucus to sup­port mil­it­ary ac­tion, he’s not mak­ing any de­mands, in­stead call­ing the de­cision a “con­science vote” for each mem­ber.

If Boehner can con­vince voters it’s Obama’s job — and not his — to win Re­pub­lic­ans to sup­port mil­it­ary ac­tion, he will have par­tially sidestepped a chal­lenge that has com­plic­ated much of his ten­ure as speak­er: cor­ralling a caucus that ranges from Re­pub­lic­an vet­er­ans to a rowdy crew of tea-party new­comers.

But re­gard­less of what his of­fice says about a Syr­ia de­cision, some of the re­spons­ib­il­ity for the out­come will land at Boehner’s feet, be­cause it’s his de­cision when to put the res­ol­u­tion to a vote. And, when it comes to Syr­ia, Boehner has no safe op­tions.

If he pushes on-the-fence Re­pub­lic­ans to sup­port Obama’s po­s­i­tion, he’ll face ac­cus­a­tions of selling out his party’s hard-liners in or­der to side with the pres­id­ent. But if he fol­lows through on his ini­tial re­fus­al to rally sup­port, Boehner risks ap­pear­ing that he has lost con­trol of his caucus, not to men­tion jeop­ard­iz­ing au­thor­iz­a­tion for a mil­it­ary strike that — by vir­tue of vot­ing “yes” — he ex­pli­citly sup­ports.

Boehner’s vote alone is no guar­an­tee of Re­pub­lic­an sup­port, as the speak­er has fallen vic­tim to caucus re­volts be­fore. Boehner was left red-faced in June when a ver­sion of the farm bill failed after 62 Re­pub­lic­ans voted against it.

And mem­bers of his caucus are already speak­ing out against Obama’s re­quest. Flor­ida’s Ted Yoho on Tues­day said more evid­ence is needed to jus­ti­fy a strike, and Michigan’s Justin Amash — a per­petu­al thorn in Boehner’s side — has spent the day tweet­ing about how his con­stitu­ents over­whelm­ing op­pose U.S. mil­it­ary en­gage­ment in Syr­ia.

If a strike has sup­port from a ma­jor­ity of the House but is op­posed by a ma­jor­ity of Re­pub­lic­ans, Boehner will have to de­cide wheth­er to abide by the so-called Hastert Rule — an in­form­al policy that calls on the speak­er to only al­low floor votes on bills that are sup­por­ted by the ma­jor­ity of his caucus.

But a seni­or House lead­er­ship aide said he “couldn’t ima­gine” the Hastert Rule be­com­ing an is­sue, as both Re­pub­lic­an sup­port­ers and op­pon­ents of mil­it­ary ac­tion have de­man­ded a chance to vote on it.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4415) }}

What We're Following See More »
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
3 days ago

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
4 days ago

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
4 days ago

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
4 days ago
California: It’s Not Over Yet
4 days ago

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.