The boom in American oil and natural gas is helping the U.S. economy and its contributions could substantially increase by the end of the decade, says a study released Wednesday by several major players in the fossil-fuel industry.
But that boost, the report warns, comes with a caveat: Regulations on hydraulic fracturing could stifle those gains and push the industry’s economic benefits below even today’s levels.
The study, conducted by Colorado-based IHS Inc. for several trade associations, looks at the economic impact of “unconventional” oil and gas, energy sources extracted by using techniques other than traditional drilling. One example, hydraulic fracturing, is used in North Dakota’s Bakken formation has helped spark the oil boom there, but has also been criticized for its environmental impact.
The economic benefits of unconventionally extracted fuels are significant, the study says. Among its findings:
- More than 2 million workers are supported by their production, and that number could hit 3.3 million by 2020.
- The industry’s contribution to gross domestic product was $284 billion in 2012, and could clear $468 billion by the end of the decade.
- State and federal governments collected $74 billion in tax revenues from unconventional oil and gas in 2012; that number could surpass $125 billion by 2020.
- The industry was responsible for $1,200 in disposable income per household nationaide in 2012; that number could near $3,000 by 2020.
But that extra money in consumers’ pockets (and the government’s) isn’t guaranteed. The study’s predictions get much more dire as it factors in potential restrictions on land use or extraction methods. Supported jobs, it estimates, would fall to 1.2 million by 2020, a loss of 2.1 million jobs. GDP contribution, estimated to exceed 3 percent, would drop to less than 1 percent. And for the average consumer? The oil-and-gas-created disposable income, estimated to be above $2,500 for 2020, could drop below $500.
Backers of the study included the American Petroleum Institute, America’s Natural Gas Alliance, the Natural Gas Supply Association, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and the American Chemistry Council.
In a statement accompanying the study, ISH Economics Vice President John Larson emphasized the industry’s benefit to the consumer. The study “puts the unconventional revolution in context as an important but little understood pocketbook issue for all Americans,” he said.
The American Petroleum Institute added its own statement on the economic dangers of imposing more regulations. “To unlock our full manufacturing potential, those in Washington must turn aside efforts that would impose duplicative regulations on shale development, raise production costs, and limit access to domestic resources,” said Kyle Isakower, API vice president for policy and economic analysis.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."