Syria in Focus as Obama Prepares for Meeting of World Leaders

Global Security Newswire Staff
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Sept. 4, 2013, 9:02 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama on Wed­nes­day traveled to Sweden as he pushed oth­er gov­ern­ments to back a po­ten­tial armed of­fens­ive against the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment for al­legedly us­ing nerve gas to kill more than 1,400 people last month, the New York Times re­por­ted.

Obama is sched­uled on Thursday to travel to St. Peters­burg to meet with oth­er lead­ers from Group of 20 na­tions. Rus­sia, the event’s spon­sor and an ally of Syr­i­an Pres­id­ent Bashar As­sad, has op­posed any use of armed force against the gov­ern­ment in Dam­as­cus.

Obama last year said any use of Syr­ia’s large chem­ic­al ar­sen­al would breach a “red line” and could force a strong U.S. re­sponse. Speak­ing on Wed­nes­day in Stock­holm, he said the threshold “wasn’t something [he] made up.”

Re­spond­ing in­ad­equately would mean the glob­al com­munity merely gives “lip ser­vice to the no­tion that these in­ter­na­tion­al norms are im­port­ant,” Obama said in com­ments quoted by the As­so­ci­ated Press. “The world set a red line when gov­ern­ments rep­res­ent­ing 98 per­cent of world pop­u­la­tion said the use of chem­ic­al weapons are ab­hor­rent.”

Mo­scow would not rule out en­dors­ing a U.N. meas­ure on an at­tack if As­sad’s gov­ern­ment were con­clus­ively es­tab­lished to have car­ried out a deadly chem­ic­al as­sault in the coun­try’s civil war, Rus­si­an Pres­id­ent Vladi­mir Putin said in a Tues­day in­ter­view with AP.

He ad­ded, though, that the pos­sib­il­ity of chem­ic­al strikes by the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment was “ab­so­lutely ab­surd.” As­sad’s forces have been gain­ing mo­mentum in re­cent months, and Dam­as­cus knows “quite well” that out­side powers could use chem­cial strikes to jus­ti­fy in­ter­ven­ing in the con­flict, he said.

The head of the United Na­tions on Tues­day urged the U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil to “de­vel­op an ap­pro­pri­ate re­sponse, should the al­leg­a­tions of use prove to be true.” However, the world “should avoid fur­ther mil­it­ar­iz­a­tion of the con­flict,” U.N. Sec­ret­ary Gen­er­al Ban Ki-moon ad­ded in com­ments to re­port­ers.

“I take note of the ar­gu­ment for ac­tion to pre­vent fu­ture uses of chem­ic­al weapons,” the U.N. chief said. “At the same time, we must con­sider the im­pact of any pun­it­ive meas­ure on ef­forts to pre­vent fur­ther blood­shed and fa­cil­it­ate a polit­ic­al res­ol­u­tion of the con­flict.”

Ana­lyt­ic­al labor­at­or­ies were set on Wed­nes­day to fin­ish re­ceiv­ing forsen­ic ma­ter­i­als gathered in Syr­ia last month by U.N. in­vest­ig­at­ors, Ban said. Find­ings could be ready in two to three weeks, a high-level en­voy told AP in com­ments quoted on Wed­nes­day.

Mean­while, French Pres­id­ent Fran­cois Hol­lande on Tues­day said his na­tion is wait­ing to see wheth­er U.S. law­makers grant Obama’s re­quest for ap­prov­al to at­tack Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment tar­gets, AP re­por­ted sep­ar­ately. France would not launch mis­siles at Syr­ia without in­ter­na­tion­al back­ing, he said.

A po­ten­tial mil­it­ary strike on Syr­ia was ex­pec­ted to come up for de­bate on Wed­nes­day in the French le­gis­lature, but Hol­lande does not re­quire par­lia­ment­ary au­thor­iz­a­tion, ac­cord­ing to AP. Brit­ish Prime Min­is­ter Dav­id Camer­on on Tues­day said he would not re-is­sue a re­quest for such an ap­prov­al from his coun­try’s law­makers, who last week de­cided against in­volving the United King­dom in a pos­sible armed of­fens­ive, the Lon­don Tele­graph re­por­ted.

Neither European gov­ern­ment has coun­ted nearly as many con­firmed cas­u­al­ties as the United States from the al­leged Aug. 21 chem­ic­al strikes near Dam­as­cus, the Los Angeles Times re­por­ted. Wash­ing­ton has as­ser­ted that 1,429 people died in the in­cid­ent, where­as France and the United King­dom said they had con­fid­ently es­tab­lished death counts of 281 and 350, re­spect­ively. French sim­u­la­tions, though, in­dic­ate that the at­tacks might have killed up to 1,500 people.

West­ern powers dif­fer on what of­fi­cials might have ordered last month’s al­leged strikes, though they have squarely pinned blame on As­sad’s re­gime, the New York Times re­por­ted on Tues­day.

Par­is be­lieves As­sad and his in­ner circle had to have au­thor­ized the at­tacks, but the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion has pub­licly ex­pressed less cer­tainty on the mat­ter. Be­hind closed doors, U.S. of­fi­cials have said the or­der for the strikes came from the head of “Unit 450,” the Syr­i­an armed forces group in charge of As­sad’s chem­ic­al ar­sen­al.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
4 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×