Internal Benghazi Report Details State Department Security Flaws

Abby Ohlheiser, The Atlantic Wire
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Abby Ohlheiser, The Atlantic Wire
Sept. 4, 2013, 9:02 a.m.

So, re­mem­ber the (small) part of the Benghazi con­spir­acy the­ory where “they” ig­nored re­peated warn­ings of se­cur­ity fail­ures at the high-risk fa­cil­ity in Libya? Well, it turns out that, ac­cord­ing to an in­tern­al gov­ern­ment re­port, the State De­part­ment failed to ad­dress a series of se­cur­ity is­sues at Amer­ica’s most vul­ner­able em­bassies for dec­ades. But con­ser­vat­ive Benghazi the­or­ists who’d like to take the ma­jor scoop and run with it will face some cog­nit­ive dis­son­ance: the doc­u­ments were ob­tained by Al Jaz­eera Amer­ica.

The re­port is a res­ult of a re­com­mend­a­tion by the State De­part­ment’s Ac­count­ab­il­ity Re­view Board in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to the Benghazi at­tacks. That re­port also found se­cur­ity fail­ures by the State De­part­ment in the case of Benghazi. The in­tern­al pan­el, whose re­port is cited by Al Jaz­eera Amer­ica, was chaired by former U.S. Secret Ser­vice Dir­ect­or Mark Sul­li­van. That re­port, which men­tions 273 “sig­ni­fic­ant at­tacks” on U.S. dip­lo­mat­ic fa­cil­it­ies between 1998 and 2012, con­cluded:

— The State De­part­ment has an en­dem­ic lack of ac­count­ab­il­ity on se­cur­ity is­sues. AJA ex­plains:

the un­der­sec­ret­ary for man­age­ment over­sees se­cur­ity is­sues while also hand­ling many oth­er re­spons­ib­il­it­ies. A newly cre­ated un­der­sec­ret­ary for dip­lo­mat­ic se­cur­ity would al­low the State De­part­ment to bet­ter fo­cus on se­cur­ity is­sues af­fect­ing dip­lo­mat­ic posts around the world.

— There’s a ser­i­ous lack of re­view pro­cesses for the bur­eau re­spons­ible for em­bassy se­cur­ity:

The Bur­eau of Dip­lo­mat­ic Se­cur­ity, the State De­part­ment se­cur­ity arm cre­ated fol­low­ing the 1983 bomb­ings of the U.S. Em­bassy and Mar­ine bar­racks in Beirut, does not have a re­view pro­cess in place to learn from pre­vi­ous se­cur­ity fail­ures.

— The sur­viv­ors of Benghazi were nev­er de­briefed.

— Risk as­sess­ments of em­bassies and con­su­lates in dan­ger­ous areas are de­term­ined by “ex­per­i­ence and in­tu­ition.” At least some high-risk fa­cil­it­ies lack an in­tel­li­gence ana­lyst on-site, and there’s no des­ig­nated fa­cil­ity to train agents en­ter­ing high-risk posts.

Al Jaz­eera, cit­ing the re­port, calls the se­cur­ity at the Benghazi fa­cil­ity “por­ous” at best. So why did it stay open? They ex­plain:

State De­part­ment of­fi­cials ef­fect­ively waived the se­cur­ity re­quire­ments. For years, the State De­part­ment has fostered a cul­ture of waiv­ing such re­quire­ments when of­fi­cials choose not to meet them. “Waivers for not meet­ing se­cur­ity stand­ards have be­come com­mon­place in the De­part­ment; however, without a risk man­age­ment pro­cess to identi­fy and im­ple­ment al­tern­ate mit­ig­at­ing meas­ures after a waiver has been giv­en, De­part­ment em­ploy­ees, par­tic­u­larly those in high threat areas, could be ex­posed to an un­ac­cept­able level of risk,” Sul­li­van’s pan­el wrote.

The res­ults in­dic­ate that the find­ings of the Benghazi agency ap­ply broadly, and go back far. Mean­while, Benghazi en­thu­si­asts are still fo­cus­ing on what ac­tu­ally in­terests them about the at­tack: how much of the tragedy they can blame per­son­ally on Pres­id­ent Obama and Hil­lary Clin­ton.

Re­prin­ted with per­mis­sion from the At­lantic Wire. The ori­gin­al story can be found here.

What We're Following See More »
TWO MONTHS AFTER REFUSING AT CONVENTION
Cruz to Back Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST
WHO TO BELIEVE?
Two Polls for Clinton, One for Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST

With three days until the first debate, the polls are coming fast and furious. The latest round:

  • An Associated Press/Gfk poll of registered voters found very few voters committed, with Clin­ton lead­ing Trump, 37% to 29%, and Gary John­son at 7%.
  • A Mc­Clatchy-Mar­ist poll gave Clin­ton a six-point edge, 45% to 39%, in a four-way bal­lot test. Johnson pulls 10% support, with Jill Stein at 4%.
  • Rasmussen, which has drawn criticism for continually showing Donald Trump doing much better than he does in other polls, is at it again. A new survey gives Trump a five-point lead, 44%-39%.
NO SURPRISE
Trump Eschewing Briefing Materials in Debate Prep
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shun­ning tra­di­tion­al de­bate pre­par­a­tions, but has been watch­ing video of…Clin­ton’s best and worst de­bate mo­ments, look­ing for her vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies.” Trump “has paid only curs­ory at­ten­tion to brief­ing ma­ter­i­als. He has re­fused to use lecterns in mock de­bate ses­sions des­pite the ur­ging of his ad­visers. He prefers spit­balling ideas with his team rather than hon­ing them in­to crisp, two-minute an­swers.”

Source:
TRUMP NO HABLA ESPANOL
Trump Makes No Outreach to Spanish Speakers
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Donald Trump "is on the precipice of becoming the only major-party presidential candidate this century not to reach out to millions of American voters whose dominant, first or just preferred language is Spanish. Trump has not only failed to buy any Spanish-language television or radio ads, he so far has avoided even offering a translation of his website into Spanish, breaking with two decades of bipartisan tradition."

Source:
$1.16 MILLION
Clintons Buy the House Next Door in Chappaqua
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Bill and Hillary Clinton have purchased the home next door to their primary residence in tony Chappaqua, New York, for $1.16 million. "By purchasing the new home, the Clinton's now own the entire cul-de-sac at the end of the road in the leafy New York suburb. The purchase makes it easier for the United States Secret Service to protect the former president and possible future commander in chief."

Source:
×