Internal Benghazi Report Details State Department Security Flaws

Abby Ohlheiser, The Atlantic Wire
See more stories about...
Abby Ohlheiser, The Atlantic Wire
Sept. 4, 2013, 9:02 a.m.

So, re­mem­ber the (small) part of the Benghazi con­spir­acy the­ory where “they” ig­nored re­peated warn­ings of se­cur­ity fail­ures at the high-risk fa­cil­ity in Libya? Well, it turns out that, ac­cord­ing to an in­tern­al gov­ern­ment re­port, the State De­part­ment failed to ad­dress a series of se­cur­ity is­sues at Amer­ica’s most vul­ner­able em­bassies for dec­ades. But con­ser­vat­ive Benghazi the­or­ists who’d like to take the ma­jor scoop and run with it will face some cog­nit­ive dis­son­ance: the doc­u­ments were ob­tained by Al Jaz­eera Amer­ica.

The re­port is a res­ult of a re­com­mend­a­tion by the State De­part­ment’s Ac­count­ab­il­ity Re­view Board in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to the Benghazi at­tacks. That re­port also found se­cur­ity fail­ures by the State De­part­ment in the case of Benghazi. The in­tern­al pan­el, whose re­port is cited by Al Jaz­eera Amer­ica, was chaired by former U.S. Secret Ser­vice Dir­ect­or Mark Sul­li­van. That re­port, which men­tions 273 “sig­ni­fic­ant at­tacks” on U.S. dip­lo­mat­ic fa­cil­it­ies between 1998 and 2012, con­cluded:

— The State De­part­ment has an en­dem­ic lack of ac­count­ab­il­ity on se­cur­ity is­sues. AJA ex­plains:

the un­der­sec­ret­ary for man­age­ment over­sees se­cur­ity is­sues while also hand­ling many oth­er re­spons­ib­il­it­ies. A newly cre­ated un­der­sec­ret­ary for dip­lo­mat­ic se­cur­ity would al­low the State De­part­ment to bet­ter fo­cus on se­cur­ity is­sues af­fect­ing dip­lo­mat­ic posts around the world.

— There’s a ser­i­ous lack of re­view pro­cesses for the bur­eau re­spons­ible for em­bassy se­cur­ity:

The Bur­eau of Dip­lo­mat­ic Se­cur­ity, the State De­part­ment se­cur­ity arm cre­ated fol­low­ing the 1983 bomb­ings of the U.S. Em­bassy and Mar­ine bar­racks in Beirut, does not have a re­view pro­cess in place to learn from pre­vi­ous se­cur­ity fail­ures.

— The sur­viv­ors of Benghazi were nev­er de­briefed.

— Risk as­sess­ments of em­bassies and con­su­lates in dan­ger­ous areas are de­term­ined by “ex­per­i­ence and in­tu­ition.” At least some high-risk fa­cil­it­ies lack an in­tel­li­gence ana­lyst on-site, and there’s no des­ig­nated fa­cil­ity to train agents en­ter­ing high-risk posts.

Al Jaz­eera, cit­ing the re­port, calls the se­cur­ity at the Benghazi fa­cil­ity “por­ous” at best. So why did it stay open? They ex­plain:

State De­part­ment of­fi­cials ef­fect­ively waived the se­cur­ity re­quire­ments. For years, the State De­part­ment has fostered a cul­ture of waiv­ing such re­quire­ments when of­fi­cials choose not to meet them. “Waivers for not meet­ing se­cur­ity stand­ards have be­come com­mon­place in the De­part­ment; however, without a risk man­age­ment pro­cess to identi­fy and im­ple­ment al­tern­ate mit­ig­at­ing meas­ures after a waiver has been giv­en, De­part­ment em­ploy­ees, par­tic­u­larly those in high threat areas, could be ex­posed to an un­ac­cept­able level of risk,” Sul­li­van’s pan­el wrote.

The res­ults in­dic­ate that the find­ings of the Benghazi agency ap­ply broadly, and go back far. Mean­while, Benghazi en­thu­si­asts are still fo­cus­ing on what ac­tu­ally in­terests them about the at­tack: how much of the tragedy they can blame per­son­ally on Pres­id­ent Obama and Hil­lary Clin­ton.

Re­prin­ted with per­mis­sion from the At­lantic Wire. The ori­gin­al story can be found here.

What We're Following See More »
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
2 days ago

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.