Stop Confusing Bashar al-Assad With Saddam Hussein

People in the last week have done it more than you’d think.

Former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein in court in Baghdad on Dec. 21, 2006.
National Journal
Matt Vasilogambros and Lucia Graves
See more stories about...
Matt Vasilogambros Lucia Graves
Sept. 4, 2013, 12:32 p.m.

Syr­ia is not Ir­aq. Nor is it Libya. But that hasn’t stopped people from the oc­ca­sion­al Freu­di­an slip in the de­bate over wheth­er to re­spond mil­it­ar­ily to al­leged chem­ic­al-weapons use in Syr­ia.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion, in its at­tempts to sway law­makers to sup­port a res­ol­u­tion that would give the pres­id­ent the power to strike the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment, has been adam­ant in list­ing the dif­fer­ences between this con­flict and oth­ers that have happened in the re­gion. Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry, in his state­ment lay­ing out the evid­ence against the As­sad re­gime, had to say a mil­it­ary re­sponse “will bear no re­semb­lance to Afgh­anistan, Ir­aq, or even Libya.”

However, in the past week, sev­er­al mem­bers of the na­tion­al me­dia and com­ment­at­ors on those pro­grams have mixed up the late Ir­aqi dic­tat­or Sad­dam Hus­sein and Syr­i­an Pres­id­ent Bashar al-As­sad.

Like Rep. Chris Van Hol­len to CNN’s Jes­sica Yel­len on Aug. 29:

Jes­sica, I think the pres­id­ent was ab­so­lutely right to es­tab­lish the red line he did. If Sad­dam Hus­sein is shown to have used chem­ic­al weapons, it’s a gross vi­ol­a­tion of in­ter­na­tion­al con­ven­tions against the use of pois­on gas. The United States and the in­ter­na­tion­al com­munity have an in­terest in de­ter­ring that activ­ity in the fu­ture, both from Sad­dam Hus­sein and oth­ers who may con­tem­plate that use in fu­ture con­flicts. So, I think it’s im­port­ant that we take this ac­tion. Ob­vi­ously it’s bet­ter if we take the ac­tion col­lect­ively, but I think the pres­id­ent was right to lay down this mark­er.

Or MS­N­BC’s An­drea Mitchell, twice, on Aug. 27:

But try­ing to de­grade the de­liv­ery sys­tem so that Sad­dam Hus­sein ““ ex­cuse me, dif­fer­ent war.

“¦

Any­thing that de­grades Sad­dam Hus­sein ““ there I go again, sorry. Any­thing that de­grades Bashar al-As­sad’s com­mands and con­trol does help the rebels.

Or even re­tired Maj. Gen. Bob Scales, a Fox News mil­it­ary ana­lyst, on Monday:

Sad­dam’s — or Sad­dam — As­sad’s army is on the move and this can­not play out well 10 or 11 days from now when we con­duct this strike.

And Paul Bremer, former U.S. am­bas­sad­or to Ir­aq, to CNN’s Wolf Blitzer on Aug. 30:

I’m not an ex­pert on what the tar­get set might be. But it seems to me there ought to be a no-fly, no-move zone along the bor­ders. We should tar­get the air force which is, after all, a way in which Sad­dam has done a lot of his in­dis­crim­in­ate killing of his own cit­izens is with the air force. There’s a lot of talk about how fancy the air de­fenses are. The Is­rael­is have been in and out at least four at­tacks that they’ve ad­mit­ted to in a last year without ap­par­ently los­ing any air­craft. So I think a lot more can be done to sup­press Sad­dam’s abil­ity to in­dis­crim­in­ately at­tack his own people.

Or, fi­nally, Bobby Ghosh, the deputy in­ter­na­tion­al ed­it­or for Time magazine, on Aug. 27 to CNN’s Bri­anna Keil­ar:

I don’t think go­ing in ““ I don’t think a big stake in­volves put­ting ““ I’m sorry to be mix­ing meta­phors ““ boots on the ground here. It is people to use the weapons that are be­ing dis­cussed right now, cruise mis­siles mainly, to take out lar­ger parts of Sad­dam ““ I beg your par­don ““ As­sad’s ar­sen­al, not simply to sort of sort of slap him across the knuckles, but take out big chunks of his air­power, his ar­til­lery.

In fair­ness, both men have re­portedly used chem­ic­al weapons on their own cit­izens, killing thou­sands of in­no­cent people in their re­spect­ive Middle East­ern na­tion. Syr­ia and Ir­aq bor­der each oth­er. And the idea of get­ting in­volved mil­it­ar­ily in an­oth­er coun­try from the Muslim world, like the United States did in Ir­aq, is over­whelm­ingly dis­con­cert­ing to many people, re­gard­less of their polit­ic­al lean­ings.

But mix­ing the two men up, still, is in­her­ently in­cor­rect.

And so is mix­ing up Syr­ia and Libya, which has happened a couple of times, as well, in the last week. Take journ­al­ist An­drew Sul­li­van, who tweeted:

I hate to de­scribe Obama as worse than Bush on any­thing, but he’s go­ing that way on Libya: ht­tp://t.co/xH9oS­fYvb2

— An­drew Sul­li­van (@sully­dish) Septem­ber 4, 2013

Or Rep. Scott Ri­gell, R-Va., who sent a let­ter to his col­leagues ask­ing them to sign on to a let­ter to Pres­id­ent Obama, ur­ging him to seek con­gres­sion­al ap­prov­al be­fore strik­ing Syr­ia. The prob­lem, among oth­er spelling and name er­rors, was that the head­line of his let­ter read:

Ri­gell Leads Bi­par­tis­an Ef­fort Ur­ging Pres­id­ent Obama to Get Con­gres­sion­al Ap­prov­al Be­fore Strik­ing Libya

Not quite, and Ri­gell later sent out a cor­rec­ted re­lease. While the U.S. played a sup­port­ing role in the Liby­an ef­fort against dic­tat­or Muam­mar el-Qad­dafi, and Libya is a Muslim na­tion, it is not Syr­ia.

And while these er­rors are easy to point out, one of the pos­sibly broad­er reas­ons why folks are hav­ing such a dif­fi­cult time keep­ing it straight might have to do with the fa­tigue sur­round­ing war and the con­flicts that con­tin­ue to stem from that re­gion.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4418) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
18 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
19 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
20 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
22 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
23 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×