How Syria Will Affect the Sequester Fight

Republicans say we’re starving the military of necessary funds. Experts are less convinced.

National Journal
Lucia Graves
Sept. 5, 2013, 4:15 a.m.

Sen. James In­hofe of Ok­lahoma, the Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee’s top Re­pub­lic­an, says the United States can’t af­ford to get in­to a con­flict with Syr­ia giv­en the dra­coni­an budget cuts that are due to hit the na­tion’s mil­it­ary.

The Pentagon faces more than $500 bil­lion in spend­ing cuts over the next dec­ade un­der auto­mat­ic fed­er­al spend­ing cuts known as se­quest­ra­tion, $54 bil­lion of that is sched­uled to hit in 2014. That’s above and bey­ond the $487 bil­lion in cuts that already planned in the Pentagon’s budget for 2013.

“Our mil­it­ary has no money left,” In­hofe said in a re­cent state­ment. “As Sec. [Chuck] Hagel, Adm. [James] Win­nefeld, and I have dis­cussed be­fore, we have a fin­an­cial crisis in our mil­it­ary,” In­hofe ad­ded. “We have a starving mil­it­ary.”

Oth­er Re­pub­lic­ans have echoed that sen­ti­ment. Rep. Buck McK­eon, R-Cal­if., chair­man of the House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee, made the case Monday on CNN: “We can­not keep ask­ing the mil­it­ary to per­form mis­sion after mis­sion with se­quest­ra­tion and mil­it­ary cuts hanging over their heads.”

Gor­don Adams, a de­fense budget ex­pert at Amer­ic­an Uni­versity who served in the Of­fice of Man­age­ment and Budget dur­ing the Clin­ton ad­min­is­tra­tion, re­cently told the Los Angeles Times that cut­ting mil­it­ary costs could be done simply by re­du­cing mil­it­ary per­son­nel and con­tract­ors in ad­min­is­trat­ive jobs. And mil­it­ary of­fi­cials have ar­gued that the cost of fir­ing cruise mis­siles at se­lect Syr­i­an tar­gets can be “re­l­at­ively eas­ily ab­sorbed.”

So, what gives?

Pres­id­ent Obama has said he won’t put “boots on the ground in Syr­ia,” but mil­it­ary plan­ners are still pre­par­ing for any pos­sible “con­tin­gen­cies,” as un­der­scored by their de­cision to dis­patch the USS Nim­itz car­ri­er strike group to the Red Sea. The pro­spect of deep­er mil­it­ary in­volve­ment in Syr­ia fol­low­ing a strike may well raise ques­tions about wheth­er se­quest­ra­tion should con­tin­ue as planned.

In­volve­ment in Syr­ia would bol­ster the ar­gu­ment for find­ing sav­ings else­where, ac­cord­ing to Thomas Mann of the Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion. “I think an af­firm­at­ive vote on an au­thor­iz­a­tion to use mil­it­ary force in Syr­ia would cla­ri­fy the ir­ra­tion­al­ity of the se­quester,” he ex­plained, “and strengthen the ar­gu­ment for re­pla­cing it with a more de­fens­ible set of spend­ing caps phased in as the eco­nomy more fully re­cov­ers, mod­est ad­di­tion­al sav­ings in Medi­care, and tax in­creases.”

Steve Bell, seni­or dir­ect­or of the Bi­par­tis­an Policy Cen­ter, isn’t con­vinced that al­ter­ing the con­ver­sa­tion will be ne­ces­sary. “Quite frankly, the way we hear it out­lined, [the cost] will prob­ably be able to be sub­sumed as the Libya activ­ity was with­in the cur­rent budget.”

He adds, “Un­less we’re talk­ing about something like a no-fly zone or ‘boots on the ground,’ then I think they’ll be able to do this with­in their budget now, and se­quest­ra­tion will not have an im­pact.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4425) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×