Mideast Spy Agencies Nervous Syria May Use Bioweapons

Global Security Newswire Staff
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Sept. 5, 2013, 9:02 a.m.

Middle East­ern in­tel­li­gence of­fi­cials are con­cerned that Syr­i­an Pres­id­ent Bashar As­sad’s re­gime could for the first time de­ploy bio­lo­gic­al weapons in re­tali­ation to an ex­pec­ted U.S. mis­sile strike, the Wash­ing­ton Post re­por­ted on Wed­nes­day.

Syr­ia has nev­er form­ally de­clared a bio­lo­gic­al weapons pro­gram, though it came close last sum­mer to ad­mit­ting own­er­ship of one.

Seni­or-rank­ing spy of­fi­cials from two Middle East­ern na­tions an­onym­ously told the Post that they have stud­ied the pos­sib­il­ity of Syr­i­an bio­lo­gic­al at­tacks in re­sponse to West­ern strikes on the Syr­i­an cap­it­al. The United States is seek­ing to build in­ter­na­tion­al sup­port around lim­ited cruise mis­sile at­tacks on the As­sad re­gime as pun­ish­ment for its widely sus­pec­ted Aug. 21 gas at­tack on Syr­i­an ci­vil­ians in the Dam­as­cus sub­urbs.

“We are wor­ried about sar­in, but Syr­ia also has bio­lo­gic­al weapons, and com­pared to those, sar­in is noth­ing,” one of the in­ter­viewed of­fi­cials said. “We know it, and oth­ers in the re­gion know it. The Amer­ic­ans cer­tainly know it.”

De­tails of Syr­ia’s re­search and de­vel­op­ment of bio­lo­gic­al weapons re­main some­what mys­ter­i­ous. A 2008 ana­lys­is by a Wash­ing­ton think tank con­cluded that the mil­it­ary likely had es­tab­lished the abil­ity to pro­duce, at a min­im­um, botulism and an­thrax.

Jill Bel­lamy van Aalst, a biode­fense ad­viser to NATO, said Syr­ia in re­cent years has ac­quired much phar­ma­ceut­ic­al equip­ment that is “dual use.” Though it may be used for val­id health re­search, the tech­no­logy also could be used to pro­duce patho­gens for weapon­iz­ing, the Post cited her as say­ing.

“You don’t stock­pile bio­lo­gic­al weapons any­more, be­cause today it’s all about pro­duc­tion ca­pa­city — and in Syr­ia the pro­duc­tion ca­pa­city is quite sub­stan­tial,” the biode­fense con­sult­ant said.

Syr­ia re­portedly pos­sesses the equip­ment ne­ces­sary for modi­fy­ing patho­gens in­to aer­o­sol or powder form — the bet­ter for dis­pers­al in mil­it­ary at­tacks. There is dis­agree­ment among U.S. of­fi­cials about just how ad­vanced a po­ten­tial Syr­i­an bio­lo­gic­al at­tack would be.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
8 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×