Pakistani Leader Reviews Nuclear Security Amid Newly Reported Concerns

Rachel Oswald, Global Security Newswire
See more stories about...
Rachel Oswald, Global Security Newswire
Sept. 5, 2013, 12:02 p.m.

WASH­ING­TON – Pakistani Prime Min­is­ter Nawaz Sharif on Thursday re­portedly said he was con­fid­ent “our nuc­le­ar fa­cil­it­ies are in safe hands” fol­low­ing new rev­el­a­tions that the U.S. in­tel­li­gence com­munity has been privately ex­press­ing con­cerns.

In re­sponse to a re­port this week in the Wash­ing­ton Post, Sharif con­vened a meet­ing of the Na­tion­al Com­mand Au­thor­ity, which has the re­spons­ib­il­ity of over­see­ing the na­tion’s nuc­le­ar ar­sen­al, ac­cord­ing to a Thursday art­icle in Pakistan’s DAWN news­pa­per.

Re­ly­ing on clas­si­fied doc­u­ments on the in­tel­li­gence com­munity’s so-called “black budget” leaked by former NSA con­tract­or Ed­ward Snowden, the Post re­por­ted that U.S. spy agen­cies have sub­stant­ively ramped up their sur­veil­lance of Pakistani nuc­le­ar, chem­ic­al and bio­lo­gic­al sites.

Re­tired Pakistani Lt. Gen. Khal­id Ahmed Kid­wai, who heads the army di­vi­sion tasked with phys­ic­ally pro­tect­ing the ar­sen­al, said that any ques­tions raised by the Post piece “re­gard­ing the safety of the nuc­le­ar fa­cil­it­ies are ground­less.”

The NCA body re­viewed se­cur­ity pro­to­cols to pro­tect the ar­sen­al, after which the prime min­is­ter in­sisted that the nuc­le­ar as­sets are se­cure.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion also con­tin­ues to pub­licly as­sert its con­fid­ence in the se­cur­ity of Pakistan’s nuc­le­ar ar­sen­al against the pos­sib­il­ity of ex­trem­ist at­tack or in­filt­ra­tion, des­pite the Post news re­port.

The U.S. State De­part­ment on Wed­nes­day said it was as­sured that Pakistan is ser­i­ous about the se­cur­ity of its nuc­le­ar ar­sen­al.

“The United States is con­fid­ent that the gov­ern­ment of Pakistan is well aware of its re­spons­ib­il­it­ies and has se­cured its nuc­le­ar ar­sen­al ac­cord­ingly,” de­part­ment spokes­wo­man Jen Psaki said in a re­leased state­ment.

“While there is room for im­prove­ment in the se­cur­ity of any coun­try’s nuc­le­ar pro­gram, Pakistan has a pro­fes­sion­al and ded­ic­ated se­cur­ity force that fully un­der­stands the im­port­ance of nuc­le­ar se­cur­ity,” Psaki said. “We re­cog­nize that Pakistan is fully en­gaged with the in­ter­na­tion­al com­munity on nuc­le­ar safety and se­cur­ity is­sues.”

Still, loc­al Taliban strikes on Pakistani mil­it­ary in­stall­a­tions in re­cent years have been “very am­bi­tious, well planned, well ex­ecuted at­tacks that in a num­ber of cases ap­pear to have had in­side as­sist­ance,” Bri­an Jen­kins, a ter­ror­ism ex­pert and seni­or ad­viser to the RAND Corp. pres­id­ent, said in a Thursday in­ter­view. “On the basis of that, the United States does have a con­cern” about the threat to Pakistan’s nuc­le­ar weapons.

The Post’s re­port­ing con­cluded that one of the prin­cip­al drivers of the U.S. sur­veil­lance ef­fort is a de­sire to learn more about how Is­lamabad pro­tects its WMD-com­pat­ible sub­stances, as the Pakistani se­cur­ity es­tab­lish­ment re­fuses to share with the United States most de­tails about how it pro­tects such ma­ter­i­als.

“Know­ledge of the se­cur­ity of Pakistan’s nuc­le­ar weapons and as­so­ci­ated ma­ter­i­al en­com­passed one of the most crit­ic­al set of … in­tel­li­gence gaps,” states the “black budget” sum­mary, as re­por­ted by the Post.

The ab­sence of this in­form­a­tion is par­tic­u­larly alarm­ing due to “the polit­ic­al in­stabil­ity, ter­ror­ist threat and ex­pand­ing in­vent­ory [of Pakistani nuc­le­ar weapons],” the re­port is fur­ther quoted as say­ing.

However, it is the United States’ own re­por­ted secret plan­ning of how to pro­tect Pakistani nuc­le­ar weapons from ter­ror­ist threats in a po­ten­tial in­ter­ven­tion that has con­trib­uted to long­stand­ing re­luct­ance among Pakistani of­fi­cials about shar­ing with Wash­ing­ton in­form­a­tion about se­cur­ity pro­to­cols.

Giv­en the de­gree of ex­trem­ist vi­ol­ence in Pakistan — in­clud­ing in re­cent years a num­ber of highly or­gan­ized and large-scale at­tacks on mil­it­ary fa­cil­it­ies — Pentagon de­fense plan­ners are be­lieved to have brain­stormed about what to do if Pakistani ter­ror­ists are on the verge of ac­quir­ing nuc­le­ar war­heads or the com­pon­ents to build their own crude ex­plos­ive device. 

A Novem­ber 2011 Na­tion­al Journ­al art­icle re­por­ted that the De­fense De­part­ment has de­veloped a range of op­tions for re­spond­ing to dif­fer­ent types of ter­ror­ist threats to Pakistan’s nuc­le­ar ar­sen­al. That kind of plan­ning, ac­cord­ing to the art­icle, has heightened Pakistani fears that the United States could swoop in at any time and steal its war­heads.

Pakistani of­fi­cials re­portedly re­spon­ded at the time by at­tempt­ing to cloak their move­ment of nuc­le­ar weapons from U.S. satel­lite sur­veil­lance by trans­port­ing them in ci­vil­ian-style vans along crowded streets. Meas­ures such as those likely have con­trib­uted to the heightened U.S. fears, as re­vealed by the Snowden doc­u­ment leak, about how little is known of the status of Pakistani war­heads and ma­ter­i­als.

Vi­p­in Narang, an as­sist­ant polit­ic­al sci­ence pro­fess­or at the Mas­sachu­setts In­sti­tute of Tech­no­logy, said there is strong reas­on to doubt Pakistani in­sist­ence about the se­cur­ity of its nuc­le­ar as­sets.

“The ap­par­ent sus­tained mil­it­ant in­terest in at­tack­ing Pakistan mil­it­ary in­stall­a­tions and their re­peated suc­cess in do­ing so would have no doubt privately con­firmed the sig­ni­fic­ant con­cerns the U.S. in­tel­li­gence com­munity has about the se­cur­ity of Pakistan’s nuc­le­ar as­sets,” Narang wrote in a Thursday e-mail.

“As the size of the Pakistan nuc­le­ar pro­gram has grown — both in terms of per­son­nel and as­sets — se­cur­ing it com­pletely against both in­sider and mil­it­ant threats be­comes in­creas­ingly dif­fi­cult,” he said.

What We're Following See More »
STAYING RELEVANT TIL 2020?
Rubio May Run for Reelection After All
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
SOCIAL ISSUES ROIL CONGRESS AGAIN
LGBT Amendment Sinks Energy and Water Approps
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

The House voted down the otherwise uncontroversial Energy and Water appropriations bill Thursday after Democrats succeeded in attaching an amendment affirming LGBT job discrimination protections for military contractors. More than 40 Republicans supported the amendment, but when it came to vote on the bill, 130 Republicans joined all but six Democrats to sink the bill. Speaker Paul Ryan said Democrats voting against the bill after securing the amendment shows their intention was to scuttle the process. Democrats, however, blamed other so-called poison-pill amendments for their votes against the bill. Nonetheless, Ryan said he intends to continue the appropriations process.

AKNOWLEDGING THE INEVITABLE
UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Source:
SCREENING DELAYS
70,000 Have Missed American Airlines Flights This Year
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Airport screening delays have caused more than 70,000 American Airlines customers and 40,000 checked bags to miss their flights this year, an executive for the airline told a U.S. congressional subcommittee on Thursday. A shortage of staff and a surge in air travelers have created a nightmare scenario for the U.S. Transportation Security Administration (TSA), with airport wait times in places like Chicago stretching beyond two hours."

Source:
AP KEEPING COUNT
Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Source:
×