The Complex Life of Border Towns

An intersection in Downtown Eagle Pass with a sign pointing to Mexico, located blocks from the official point of entry.
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Elahe Izad
Sept. 5, 2013, 3:30 p.m.

EAGLE PASS, TEXAS — Sam Far­hat grew up in this small south Texas town where he now owns Cow­boy Cor­ral, a cloth­ing shop where cus­tom­ers per­use racks of jeans, belts, and shirts while Far­hat — a big man of Palestini­an her­it­age wear­ing a cow­boy hat — an­swers their ques­tions in Span­ish.

Far­hat’s busi­ness de­pends upon the foot traffic that leg­ally enters the United States from Mex­ico, just blocks from his down­town store­front. Out­side, people leav­ing dis­count per­fume, dress, and shoe stores carry shop­ping bags as they cross the bridge on foot, walk­ing past cars lined up wait­ing to cross the bor­der.

But talk in Wash­ing­ton of tight­en­ing bor­der se­cur­ity in towns like Eagle Pass as part of broad­er im­mig­ra­tion re­forms has loc­als weary. “That’s not go­ing to help busi­ness, that’s for sure,” Far­hat said. “It’s already hard enough for people to come across the bor­der.”

For res­id­ents in Eagle Pass and oth­er nearby towns, the bor­der is not a polit­ic­al top­ic or an ab­stract concept — the Rio Grande River that sep­ar­ates Mex­ico from the United States is in their back­yard. Many of the ideas un­der con­sid­er­a­tion, from bor­der fen­cing to ad­di­tion­al Bor­der Patrol agents and even drones over­head, will have a dir­ect im­pact here.

“Those of us who live along the bor­der want to be just as safe and se­cure in our beds as any­one else does, but we want a solu­tion that works,” said Demo­crat­ic Rep. Pete Gal­lego, whose dis­trict in­cludes Eagle Pass. “We don’t want a polit­ic­al solu­tion, we want a prac­tic­al solu­tion.”

That may not be easy. In many ways, Eagle Pass rep­res­ents the com­plex­ity of liv­ing in small bor­der towns, where life can be woven to­geth­er tightly with those of neigh­bor­ing com­munit­ies in Mex­ico. Res­id­ents here cross the bor­der reg­u­larly in­to the town of Piedras Negras, Mex­ico, to vis­it fam­il­ies and friends. Lines can get long on both sides of the bridge around Christ­mas and East­er. Com­munit­ies along the bor­der of­ten refer to their “sis­ter cit­ies” on the Mex­ic­an side, and may­ors and loc­al agen­cies have work­ing re­la­tion­ships. What hap­pens on one side of­ten af­fects the oth­er.

“Blood lines don’t stop,” said Laura Al­len, the Re­pub­lic­an county judge in nearby Val Verde County, which in­cludes the town of Del Rio. “Re­la­tion­ships don’t stop at the river.”

Se­cur­ing the Bor­der

In terms of se­cur­ity, Bor­der Patrol agents are a more com­mon sight in town than loc­al po­lice, and they of­ten help in re­spond­ing to emer­gen­cies. And the town already has some bor­der fen­cing; in 2008, Eagle Pass was the first town the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment sued in its ef­fort to in­crease bor­der fen­cing, draw­ing fierce op­pos­i­tion from town of­fi­cials and res­id­ents.

If Con­gress passes an im­mig­ra­tion bill, many of the se­cur­ity ele­ments could in­tensi­fy. The im­mig­ra­tion bill passed by the Sen­ate es­sen­tially calls for in­sti­tut­ing a mil­it­ary-like pres­ence along the bor­der, spend­ing $46 bil­lion to double the num­ber of Bor­der Patrol agents to 40,000, build 700 miles of bor­der fen­cing, and bol­ster tech­no­logy such as drones to in­crease sur­veil­lance.

Bor­der-se­cur­ity le­gis­la­tion un­an­im­ously passed out of the House Home­land Se­cur­ity Com­mit­tee, au­thored by Chair­man Mi­chael Mc­Caul, R-Texas, takes a dif­fer­ent ap­proach. Be­fore a dol­lar amount is dic­tated, the bill calls on the Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment to first de­vel­op a bor­der-se­cur­ity plan — sub­ject to con­gres­sion­al ap­prov­al — that would elim­in­ate 90 per­cent of il­leg­al bor­der cross­ings with­in five years. Demo­crat­ic Rep. Sheila Jack­son Lee co­sponsored the bill, and oth­er Demo­crats have signaled they find the lan­guage easi­er to work with than the Sen­ate bor­der-se­cur­ity pro­vi­sion. It’s ex­pec­ted to be one of the first pieces of im­mig­ra­tion le­gis­la­tion that House takes up after re­cess.

The con­gres­sion­al dis­trict with the longest stretch of the Mex­ic­an-U.S. bor­der in­cludes Eagle Pass. It’s a swing dis­trict that Pres­id­ent Obama lost but Gal­lego won in 2012. Gal­lego says bor­der se­cur­ity is not a par­tis­an is­sue in his dis­trict.

“One of the frus­tra­tions that people along the bor­der have is so many people who are try­ing to drive the de­bate on bor­der policy and bor­der se­cur­ity are people who don’t live on the bor­der, who’ve nev­er been to the bor­der, and yet they’re try­ing to dic­tate the terms by which we do bor­der se­cur­ity,” he said.

In­deed, there is a wide­spread sen­ti­ment here that people mak­ing polit­ic­al cal­cu­la­tions about the bor­der don’t have sense of what daily life is like in bor­der com­munit­ies.

“They use the bor­der, they see the area as a sword and a shield in polit­ics, but we’re hu­man be­ings, we live down here,” said Demo­crat­ic State Rep. Poncho Nevarez, whose home is on the banks of the Rio Grande, so close that he can point to Mex­ico from his porch. His wife is Mex­ic­an, and his chil­dren take classes across the bor­der.

“We shouldn’t be pawns in this game to see who can get them­selves elec­ted be­cause they can beat their chest more about how they se­cured the bor­der,” he said.

Un­like oth­er parts of the bor­der where vi­ol­ence from Mex­ico makes head­lines, of­fi­cials here say prob­lems are com­par­at­ively tame, par­tially due to the pres­ence of Bor­der Patrol and state of af­fairs in neigh­bor­ing Mex­ic­an cit­ies.

“We’re kind of the un­seen area of the bor­der here. You can go to El Paso, you can go to Laredo, but they don’t have the same is­sues we have,” Al­len said. “Ask me when was the last time we had to shut down our bridge be­cause vi­ol­ence spilled over from Mex­ico. It’s not hap­pen­ing.”

Bor­der Patrol of­fi­cials say they do ap­pre­hend people who com­mit ser­i­ous crimes in the U.S. and cross back il­leg­ally. In the Del Rio bor­der sec­tor, 50 pounds of co­caine and 63,485 pounds of marijuana were seized by Bor­der Patrol in fisc­al 2012.

One ma­jor pub­lic-safety scare took place here last year, when more than 130 in­mates broke out of a pris­on just over the bor­der in Piedras Negras. Au­thor­it­ies at the time were con­cerned that pris­on­ers could cross over to Eagle Pass, but it turns out that a Mex­ic­an drug car­tel was likely be­hind the pris­on break, a tac­tic car­tels use to re­plen­ish their ranks. Au­thor­it­ies found one sus­pec­ted es­capee this sum­mer hid­ing in a home in Eagle Pass, but there was no oth­er fal­lout.

Nevarez, who can point to the pris­on area from his yard, re­called rush­ing home after hear­ing of the break. But his fears were quickly al­layed as he reasoned that many of those pris­on­ers wer­en’t go­ing to cross in­to Amer­ic­an soil, but rather stay in Mex­ico to work for the car­tels.

Gal­lego says that people in bor­der com­munit­ies are united be­hind want­ing to do something about the car­tels and drug trade.

“The people com­ing here, even if they’re com­ing here il­leg­ally, they’re com­ing here to work in ag­ri­cul­ture or con­struc­tion,” said Shawn Mor­an, vice pres­id­ent of Na­tion­al Bor­der Patrol Coun­cil, a uni­on rep­res­ent­ing Bor­der Patrol agents. “But there is a large group that is com­ing here to sell drugs or be part of crim­in­al gangs and com­mit crimes. We shouldn’t over­look that in any sort of im­mig­ra­tion re­form.”

The Bor­der Patrol

Bor­der Patrol and oth­er fed­er­al agen­cies of­ten con­sti­tute the most vis­ible law en­force­ment in bor­der com­munit­ies. About 55,000 people live in the town and its outly­ing areas in Mav­er­ick County; Eagle Pass’s po­lice de­part­ment numbered 76 in 2012.

Au­thor­it­ies won’t re­lease fig­ures on the num­bers of bor­der agents des­ig­nated for par­tic­u­lar towns, but Eagle Pass and Del Rio are the two ma­jor towns in the Del Rio Bor­der Patrol sec­tor, which in­cludes 210 miles of bor­der and nearly 60,000 square miles of ter­rit­ory.There were 1,665 Bor­der Patrol agents des­ig­nated for this area in 2012, a fig­ure that doesn’t in­clude Cus­toms and Bor­der Pro­tec­tion and oth­er fed­er­al agents.

Bar chart showing the amount of agents staffed in the southwestern Border Patrol sectors. National Journal

Nearly 87 per­cent of the na­tion’s 21,394 Bor­der Patrol agents come from the nine south­w­est bor­der sec­tors. The Del Rio sec­tor ranks in the middle in terms of the num­ber of agents.

While Bor­der Patrol agents are ac­cep­ted as mem­bers of the com­munity and re­garded with re­spect, Gal­lego said some loc­als get frus­trated with the check­points. Bor­der Patrol check­points on roads ex­tend far bey­ond the bor­der; all mo­tor­ists have to stop and an­swer ques­tions re­lated to their cit­izen­ship. A dog trained to de­tect drugs sniffs cars, and check­point sta­tions are equipped with cam­er­as, equip­ment to de­tect ra­dio­act­ive ele­ments, and tem­por­ary hold­ing cells for sus­pec­ted il­leg­al im­mig­rants.

In 2012, the Bor­der Patrol ap­pre­hen­ded 21,720 il­leg­al im­mig­rants in the Del Rio sec­tor, the highest num­ber in the sec­tor since 2007 and much high­er than the El Paso sec­tor’s 9,678 ap­pre­hen­sions.

Mor­an says the bor­der can be se­cured with few­er than the ad­di­tion­al 20,000 agents called for in the Sen­ate bill. His group pushed for an amend­ment by Sen. Jon Test­er, D-Mont., that would have re­vamped the pay sys­tem to al­low flex­ib­il­ity for agents work­ing over­time and cov­er­ing shifts.

“It’s usu­ally dur­ing the busiest times, and when the smug­glers know when we’re in between shifts, and that’s when they try to make their moves,” Mor­an said.

The ad­di­tion of more Bor­der Patrol agents could have an eco­nom­ic im­pact in these com­munit­ies, with an in­flux of jobs and dol­lars spent loc­ally. Some ranch­ers and oth­ers liv­ing fur­ther from the bor­der also want more agents to mon­it­or those tra­vers­ing their prop­er­ties as they make their way in­land. But many of­fi­cials close to the bor­der are skep­tic­al that the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment will be able to fully fund and sus­tain a doub­ling of Bor­der Patrol agents.

“If you’re telling me you’re go­ing to double the num­ber of gov­ern­ment jobs in my com­munity and if you’re go­ing to al­low these people to con­trib­ute to the eco­nomy, they’re go­ing to eat out at res­taur­ants and shop at stores and buy homes — from an eco­nom­ic de­vel­op­ment per­spect­ive, I’m for that,” Gal­lego said. “But that’s not a bor­der-se­cur­ity per­spect­ive. We haven’t done any­thing for bor­der se­cur­ity when we’ve done that.”

Eagle Pass May­or Ram­sey Eng­lish Cantu said that while there is a need to “have a great pres­ence,” he would like to see re­sources poured in­to Cus­toms and Bor­der Pro­tec­tion, which op­er­ate the of­fi­cial entry points in­to the United States and where lines can back up. “We con­tin­ue to see ports of entries where people are smug­gling drugs across be­cause there isn’t the ne­ces­sary in­fra­struc­ture,” he said. “These are the things that need to be ul­ti­mately ad­dressed.”

Far­hat and oth­ers in Eagle Pass would like to see more re­sources poured in­to short­en­ing the lines at the of­fi­cial ports of entry, which are op­er­ated by Cus­toms and Bor­der Pro­tec­tion, not Bor­der Patrol. Tolls col­lec­ted at the town’s two points of entry make up more than a quarter of Eagle Pass’s budget rev­en­ues.

The Fence

The fence, which once drew out­rage in these com­munit­ies, now at­tracts a level of amuse­ment.

In Eagle Pass, it’s more than 10 feet high, cuts through a city golf course, and in­cludes open­ings throughout. “If those folks in Ohio were to see this, they’d say, ‘Is this what you’re wast­ing my tax dol­lars on?’ ” Nevarez said.

In Del Rio, Amer­ic­an land sits on the oth­er side of an ap­prox­im­ately 2-mile por­tion of the fence, and Al­len asks wheth­er the Amer­ic­an gov­ern­ment has cre­ated a De­mil­it­ar­ized Zone. It stops at a low, barbed-wire fence on private prop­erty. Loc­als point to the fence gates, with ex­tra ho­ri­zont­al bars, as places people climb over.

“The fence was not a good thing,” Al­len said. “We would have liked to see that money put to use for oth­er things be­cause, like I said, I can very eas­ily show you where people walk around it, so why did we spend all that money?”

Between 2006 and 2009, the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment al­loc­ated $2.4 bil­lion for con­struc­tion of 670 miles of ped­es­tri­an and vehicu­lar fences, with costs ran­ging between $400,000 and $15.1 mil­lion per mile, de­pend­ing on the loc­a­tion, fence ma­ter­i­al, to­po­graphy and kind of fence, ac­cord­ing to a 2009 Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice re­port.

But Bor­der Patrol of­fi­cials point to the fence as a use­ful tool in help­ing to man­age cross­ings; agents can tar­get their patrols bet­ter since they know where the entry points are. Mor­an says the fence has been very use­ful in slow­ing down the traffic across the bor­der, par­tic­u­larly vehicu­lar cross­ings.

“But no fence is go­ing to stop people who are de­term­ined to get in­to this coun­try. You can’t have a fence with gaps if you want it to be ef­fect­ive,” Mor­an said. “The tech­no­logy is great and it’s an as­set, but no drone and no fence or whatever made an ar­rest. Those help us do our jobs.”

There’s also a sense in bor­der com­munit­ies that the fence makes them ap­pear to be bad neigh­bors.

“If we take this mi­li­tia ap­proach to our bor­der, what kind of mes­sage are we send­ing to our sis­ter coun­try? I don’t like that mes­sage,” Al­len said. “Would we do that on the bor­der with Canada? I really don’t feel like we would.”


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.