Can Fracking Cause Earthquakes?

A study confirms a 2011 series of tremors in Ohio were caused by spent hydraulic-fracturing materials injected deep into the ground.

With the skyline of Youngstown, Ohio in the distance, a brine injection well owned by Northstar Disposal Services LLC is seen in Youngstown on Wednesday, Jan. 4, 2011.
National Journal
Brian Resnick
Sept. 5, 2013, 12:36 p.m.

Be­fore 2011, Young­stown, Ohio, had nev­er ex­per­i­enced an earth­quake. Or at least, the area hadn’t had one since 1776, when re­cord-keep­ing began. So it was strange, dur­ing a nine-month peri­od of 2011, that nine of them shook the town.

At first these were small; none topped 2.7 on the Richter scale — tiny things, not per­ceived much dif­fer­ently than the passing of a heavy truck. But then, the quakes es­cal­ated. On Dec. 31, 2011, at 3:05 p.m., Young­stown was stirred by a 3.9 (a loc­al news­pa­per crowd­sourced its read­ers to re­spond to the ques­tion “Did you feel the boom?” You’ll want to read some of the an­swers.) To be sure, this still wasn’t a huge quake. For some per­spect­ive, the one that hit the D.C. area in Ju­ly 2011 was a stronger 5.8. But still, while earth­quakes in the great­er Ohio area aren’t un­heard of (there have been at least 200 since 1776), hav­ing such a con­cen­trated num­ber was odd for the area, es­pe­cially in a city that had pre­vi­ously ex­per­i­enced none.

Loc­ated sus­pi­ciously near all of this seis­mic activ­ity was the North­star 1 well, which pumped chem­ic­al-laden hy­draul­ic-frac­tur­ing, or frack­ing, flu­id deep with­in the ground, at a rate around 1,300 gal­lons per hour. Right after the 3.9 quake, the Ohio De­part­ment of Nat­ur­al Re­sources dir­ect­or took to a news con­fer­ence to say, “The seis­mic events are not a dir­ect res­ult of frack­ing.” In any case, the well was shut down for in­vest­ig­a­tion. (It had ac­tu­ally been shut down just a few days pri­or in re­sponse to a 2.7 quake. The New Year’s Eve quake turned it off for the long term.)

Now, the data is in, and it ap­pears the Nat­ur­al Re­sources dir­ect­or’s as­sess­ment was flat-out wrong. “We con­clude that the re­cent, 2011-2012, earth­quakes in Young­stown, Ohio were in­duced by the flu­id in­jec­tion at North­star 1 deep in­jec­tion well due to in­creased pore pres­sure along the preex­ist­ing faults loc­ated close to the well­bore,” an art­icle in the most re­cent Journ­al of Geo­phys­ic­al Re­search con­cludes. Pore pres­sure refers to the force ex­er­ted on un­der­ground rock by flu­ids. Fur­ther­more, the re­search finds a cor­rel­a­tion between the quakes and the daily volume of ma­ter­i­al be­ing in­jec­ted in­to the well. After a peak of in­jec­tion pres­sure in­to the well, five days later, seis­mic activ­ity would spike as well.

What seemed to hap­pen was that the high-pres­sure flu­id moved along a preex­ist­ing fault in a west-south­w­est dir­ec­tion (away from the well), in­creas­ing pres­sure on the rock form­a­tions as it pro­gressed. This de­creased the res­ist­ance the rock had to fault­ing, which in­creased the risk of an earth­quake. And the loc­a­tion of the seis­mic activ­ity moved as the the flu­id did, along the fault line. When the pump­ing at the well stopped, the study con­cludes, the earth­quakes waned.

However, it’s not the case that frack­ing flu­id will al­ways cause earth­quakes. In the case of Young­stown, the place­ment of the well over an un­known fault led to the town shak­ing. After all, the North­star 1 “is the only well out of 177 … waste dis­pos­al wells op­er­at­ing in the state of Ohio dur­ing 2011 that has been linked to po­ten­tially in­duced earth­quakes.”

What We're Following See More »
A DARK CLOUD OVER TRUMP?
Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
2 days ago
THE LATEST

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

Source:
IN CASE OF EMERGENCY
A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Source:
THE LAST ROUND OF NEW HAMPSHIRE POLLS
Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
1 days ago
THE LATEST

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.
IT’S ALL ABOUT SECOND PLACE
CNN Calls the Primary for Sanders and Trump
23 hours ago
THE LATEST

Well that didn’t take long. CNN has already declared Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump the winners of the New Hampshire primary, leaving the rest of the candidates to fight for the scraps. Five minutes later, the Associated Press echoed CNN’s call.

Source:
×