BLACKWELL, OKLA — The House debate over whether to authorize President Obama to take action in Syria will overshadow other legislative work this week, but Congress will finish a new farm bill before the end of the year, House Agriculture Committee Chairman Frank Lucas, R-Okla., predicted at a town-hall meeting last week that also indicated constituents are more concerned about Syria and other issues.
With House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., planning to bring up a bill to cut $40 billion over 10 years from food stamps before proceeding to conference on the farm bill, Lucas started his town hall in this rural community of about 7,000 people in north-central Oklahoma last Thursday with a lengthy explanation about why Congress still hasn’t finished the new bill.
Not enough of his Republican colleagues voted for a comprehensive bill in June, Lucas acknowledged, forcing the House leadership to bring up a farm-program-only bill that passed with only Republican votes in July. The plan now is to vote on a nutrition bill in September before appointing conferees to meet with their counterparts in the Senate. The Senate passed its own comprehensive bill in June.
“It shouldn’t be this hard to pass a farm bill that makes sure we have food,” Lucas said.
On Syria, Lucas told the approximately 50 attendees he had not taken an “absolute” position on authorizing military action, but that having been in Congress long enough to observe the involvements in Bosnia, Iraq, and Afghanistan it is hard for him to be “enthusiastic” about supporting U.S. military action if there is not a clear threat to the country.
Several constituents urged Lucas to vote no on the Syria bill, but only one man asked about the farm bill. Rick Jeans, a wheat, corn, and grain-sorghum farmer who sits on the executive board of the National Association of Conservation Districts, told Lucas that he had heard that a two-year extension of the farm bill is more likely than passage of a new bill.
“I have a hard time believing we will have a two-year extension or a one-year extension,” Lucas said. “Both the majority and minority leadership see a blister they need lanced.”
The nutrition issue, Lucas said, is a matter of how big a cut should be made to the food-stamp program. Ultimately that will be up to Obama, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, he said. “If the crowd on high would agree, we could fill in the details in a matter of hours,” Lucas said.
The really tough remaining hurdle, he said, is the difference between the Senate and House bills on the commodity title. The Senate bill “puts 95 percent of their eggs” in the basket of “shallow loss” payments for losses not covered by crop insurance, while the House bill offers payments based on higher target prices for all crops. “Shallow-loss crop revenue is wonderful if you are in the Midwest,” Lucas said. “If you are not in the Midwest it is not so wonderful.”¦ If [the farm bill] doesn’t apply to all regions it is not a federal bill.”
No one at the town hall asked about food stamps. Oklahoma has already passed a law that will achieve one of Cantor’s goals. It forbids the state from asking for another waiver from a federal restriction that says able-bodied adults between 18 and 50 without dependents (known in nutrition circles as ABAWDs) should get food stamps for only three months in any three-year period.
Tom Short, the executive director of the food pantry in nearby Ponca City, recalled in an interview that when the ABAWDs were first restricted in the 1996 welfare-reform law, “there were more people coming in my door,” and predicted that will happen again. Cook said that demand for his services doubled during the Great Recession and that he and his staff were too busy providing assistance to attend town halls.
Back in Washington, Cantor sent Republican House members a memo last week detailing the proposal to cut $40 billion from food stamps. The memo cited news reports that there are “surfers” living on food stamps as a reason for restricting states’ ability to ask for waivers for the ABAWDs. But the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities said in a report Friday that there are at least 900,000 veterans receiving food stamps and that the proposal could cut off food stamps for homeless veterans. The Cantor proposal would take 4 million to 6 million people off food stamps, the report said.
A House Democratic aide said that once Republican members realize the full impact of the food-stamp cuts under Cantor’s proposal, the House GOP leaders may wish to fold the farm bill into a larger piece of legislation and not force members to vote on a measure that could increase hunger in their districts. “They will want to look like they make the steep cuts but want flexibility for members that may not want to cut as deeply,” the aide predicted.
Contributing Editor Jerry Hagstrom is the founder and executive director of The Hagstrom Report, which may be found at www.HagstromReport.com.
What We're Following See More »
In a statement Friday, Sen. John McCain wrote, "I cannot in good conscience vote for the Graham-Cassidy proposal. I believe we could do better working together, Republicans and Democrats, and have not yet really tried. Nor could I support it without knowing how much it will cost, how it will effect insurance premiums, and how many people will be helped or hurt by it. Without a full CBO score, which won't be available by the end of the month, we won't have reliable answers to any of those questions." His "no" vote makes it much less likely Republicans will repeal and replace Obamacare by Sept. 30.
As anticipated, the Department of Education today withdrew the controversial Obama-era "Dear Colleague" letter on campus sexual assault, replacing it with new interim guidance. Most notably, the new guidance permits colleges to use a “clear and convincing” standard of evidence, rather than the preponderance of evidence standard that the 2011 letter seemed to mandate. "The new guidance also states that colleges may facilitate informal resolutions, including mediation, if all parties agree to participate in that process."
"The Trump administration will unveil more tailored restrictions on travelers from certain countries as a replacement to the controversial travel ban, according to a senior administration official. The new restrictions will vary by country. They could include a ban on travel to the United States, or new restrictions on obtaining a visa for citizens of particular countries." They are expected to be unveiled by Sunday.
In a live-streamed address from Silicon Valley, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg announced a nine-point plan that the tech giant is rolling out over coming months to respond to "efforts by nation-states and private actors to use the social media platform to influence U.S. elections." Most importantly, the company will force all advertisers to disclose what ads they're running to all audiences. “When someone buys political ads on TV or other media, they’re required by law to disclose who paid for them,” Zuckerberg said. “But you still don’t know if you’re seeing the same messages as everyone else. So we’re going to bring Facebook to an even higher standard of transparency. Not only will you have to disclose which page paid for an ad, but we will also make it so you can visit an advertiser’s page and see the ads they’re currently running to any audience on Facebook.”
As "part of a broader Trump administration order for anti-leaks training at all executive branch agencies," Environmental Protection Agency employees "are attending mandatory training sessions this week to reinforce their compliance with laws and rules against leaking classified or sensitive government information ... Relatively few EPA employees deal with classified files, but the new training also reinforces requirements to keep 'Controlled Unclassified Information' from unauthorized disclosure."