Assessing the potential nuclear dangers of U.S. military intervention in Syria could place the International Atomic Energy Agency in violation of its mandate, Washington’s envoy to the U.N. nuclear watchdog said on Monday.
The Vienna, Austria-based organization “must determine whether there is a scientific basis for conducting a highly speculative investigation of this kind,” Ambassador Joseph Macmanus in a statement prepared for delivery at a meeting of the 35-nation IAEA Board of Governors.
Moscow’s push for the analysis brings up a range of concerns tied to statutes, politics and implementation, IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano said to reporters on Monday. “I hope people understand that [responding] takes time,” he added, noting that Moscow had pushed for a quick answer from his agency.
An attack would risk dispersing highly enriched uranium to the surrounding environment, Russia has warned. The bomb-usable material could not be tracked following an aerial assault, Moscow indicated, possibly alluding to the material’s vulnerability to seizure by nonstate actors.
Amano said Syria’s only known research reactor does not contain a “big amount” of highly enriched uranium, but he added that additional radiological materials could be in storage at multiple Syrian medical and scientific facilities.
Former IAEA safeguards chief Olli Heinonen said the Middle Eastern country “should have substantial amounts” of atomic assets such as radioactive cobalt isotopes.
Such holdings could be “of a greater concern, if they end up in wrong hands,” Heinonen told Reuters by e-mail. “Normally they are stored in protected vaults.”
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.