Ted Cruz Flips on Fast-Track

The GOP White House hopeful now says he will vote against Trade Promotion Authority because he doesn’t trust President Obama.

Republican presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz speaks during the Freedom Summit on May 9, 2015 in Greenville, South Carolina.
National Journal
June 23, 2015, 7:11 a.m.

Ted Cruz was a fierce defender of Trade Promotion Authority. Now, he is fighting against it.

In a blistering op-ed in Breitbart, Cruz announced Tuesday he no longer plans to support Trade Promotion Authority, legislation he voted for weeks that gives Congress an up-or-down vote on trade bills the president negotiates over the next six years. Citing concerns over immigration and “corrupt Washington backroom deal-making,” Cruz reversed his position just hours before the Senate was poised to hold a procedural vote on the bill.

“Why does Republican Leadership always give in to the Democrats? Why does Leadership always disregard the promises made to the conservative grassroots?” Cruz wrote.

In order to back the bill, Cruz demanded he get immigration amendments that would block changes in immigrant flows from being included in any future trade bill as well as an explicit promise from Republican leaders that they would let the controversial Export-Import Bank expire at the end of the month. The unrelated Ex-Im Bank issue has become a rallying call for outside groups like Heritage Action, which scored against the House trade vote partly because leaders would not assure conservatives that the bank would cease.

“There’s too much corporate welfare, too much cronyism and corrupt deal-making, by the Washington cartel,” Cruz said in the op-ed. “For too long, career politicians in both parties have supported government of the lobbyist, by the lobbyist, and for the lobbyist — at the expense of the taxpayers.”

In the op-ed, Cruz explains that he asked Majority Leader Mitch McConnell if the leader had secured a deal to reauthorize Ex-Im and was told that was not the case. However, Cruz was taken aback when Boehner would not promise conservatives that Ex-Im would expire. In a Twitter exchange Tuesday morning, Cruz spokesman Brian Phillips had strong words for those who were critical that Cruz had ever supported TPA. “Seems like you’re asking why Cruz would believe anything the Majority Leader tells him? Fair point, I guess,” Phillips wrote.

His reversal is significant as it is a departure from the presidential contender’s previous statements on trade and marks a major blow for Republican leaders who are seeking to hold conservative support together for the trade bill. Initially, Cruz had been a key ally for GOP leaders. The freshman Texas senator had penned an op-ed with the bill’s architect Paul Ryan in The Wall Street Journal praising the bill.

“The stakes are high, because if you’re not moving forward in trade negotiations, you’re falling behind,” Cruz and Ryan wrote.

It appears now that the stakes are too high for Cruz to buck Heritage Action and vote for the trade bill.

What We're Following See More »
AVOIDS SHUTDOWN WITH A FEW HOURS TO SPARE
Trump Signs Border Deal
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Source:
REDIRECTS $8 BILLION
Trump Declares National Emergency
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

Source:
COULD SOW DIVISION AMONG REPUBLICANS
House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."

Source:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, DRUG FORFEITURE FUND
Where Will the Emergency Money Come From?
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

"ABC News has learned the president plans to announce on Friday his intention to spend about $8 billion on the border wall with a mix of spending from Congressional appropriations approved Thursday night, executive action and an emergency declaration. A senior White House official familiar with the plan told ABC News that $1.375 billion would come from the spending bill Congress passed Thursday; $600 million would come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture fund; $2.5 billion would come from the Pentagon's drug interdiction program; and through an emergency declaration: $3.5 billion from the Pentagon's military construction budget."

Source:
TRUMP SAYS HE WILL SIGN
House Passes Funding Deal
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed a massive border and budget bill that would avert a shutdown and keep the government funded through the end of September. The Senate passed the measure earlier Thursday. The bill provides $1.375 billion for fences, far short of the $5.7 billion President Trump had demanded to fund steel walls. But the president says he will sign the legislation, and instead seek to fund his border wall by declaring a national emergency."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login