Obama’s Fast-Track Bill Inches Another Step Forward

Trade Promotion Authority clears the Senate’s vital 60-vote threshold.

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 06: U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) speaks to members of the press as he is on his way for a vote January 6, 2014 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. Janet Yellen was confirmed by the Senate with a vote of 56 - 26 to become the first woman to head the Federal Reserve Board.
National Journal
June 23, 2015, 8:17 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama is one step closer to seal­ing the most im­port­ant trade pact in dec­ades after the Sen­ate nar­rowly voted Tues­day to ad­vance the so-called “fast-track” bill.

The move is a prom­ising sign for the ad­min­is­tra­tion, which has suffered two de­feats in the past few weeks at the hands of its Demo­crat­ic col­leagues in the House and Sen­ate des­pite the most ag­gress­ive lob­by­ing ef­fort since the Obama­care de­bate. The ad­min­is­tra­tion has labeled Trade Pro­mo­tion Au­thor­ity one of its highest pri­or­it­ies.

With the ab­sence of Sen. Bob Cork­er and Sen. Ted Cruz switch­ing his vote, the bill cleared a pro­ced­ur­al hurdle with the bare min­im­um 60 votes. As Nevada Sen. Dean Heller walked onto the floor to cast his vote, his col­league, Sen. John Bar­rasso, called him, “Mr. 60!”

The bill would set up a frame­work for Con­gress to re­ject or rat­i­fy, but not change, trade deals for the next six years. The cur­rent and pre­vi­ous ad­min­is­tra­tions have ar­gued that TPA is ne­ces­sary to ne­go­ti­ate and seal deals, as po­ten­tial part­ners are wary of con­gres­sion­al in­ter­fer­ence. The TPA bill is ex­pec­ted to pass Wed­nes­day and a re­lated meas­ure provid­ing sup­port to work­ers dis­placed by such pacts, Trade Ad­just­ment As­sist­ance, is likely to get a vote Thursday.

“We have demon­strated we can work to­geth­er on a bi­par­tis­an basis to achieve something that is ex­tremely im­port­ant for Amer­ica,” said Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell on the cham­ber floor be­fore the vote. “Not only when we con­firm this Trade Pro­mo­tion Au­thor­ity will we have the mech­an­ism in place for the pres­id­ent to fi­nal­ize an ex­traordin­ar­ily im­port­ant deal with a num­ber of dif­fer­ent Asi­an coun­tries, but it will in­dic­ate that Amer­ica is back in the trade busi­ness. It will also send a mes­sage to our al­lies that we un­der­stand they’re some­what wary about Chinese com­mer­cial and po­ten­tially mil­it­ary dom­in­a­tion and that we in­tend to still be deeply in­volved in the Pa­cific.”

But the trade de­bate isn’t over yet. Demo­crats in both cham­bers are sus­pi­cious of Re­pub­lic­an lead­ers and wheth­er they will de­liv­er on their as­sur­ances to hold a vote on TAA. Sen. Tim Kaine, who voted for the meas­ure Tues­day, said he would vote against the up­com­ing Trans-Pa­cific Part­ner­ship deal, the most sig­ni­fic­ant trade deal since NAF­TA, un­less that as­sist­ance is passed.

“We still need vig­or­ous en­force­ment in TAA,” said Kaine. “For my sake, I got as­sur­ances I need that made me feel com­fort­able vot­ing today. But I’ve got a back­stop, which is if those as­sur­ances are not met, then I will vote against the treaty when it even­tu­ally hits the table. I’m not go­ing to vote for TPP when there is no pro­gram to re­train work­ers who are af­fected by trade.”

House Speak­er John Boehner is­sued a state­ment Tues­day morn­ing aimed at ad­dress­ing those con­cerns.

“We re­main com­mit­ted to en­sur­ing that both TPA and TAA are passed and en­acted in­to law,” Boehner said. “The House has passed TPA as a stand-alone meas­ure. The House will con­sider TAA once it passes the Sen­ate as part of a new trade-pref­er­ences bill. And we are ready to go to con­fer­ence on the cus­toms bill. Our goal is to get TPA and TAA to the pres­id­ent’s desk this week and de­liv­er this win for the Amer­ic­an people.”

The de­bate over free trade has split the Demo­crat­ic Party for dec­ades. Obama has had to pres­sure around two dozen House Demo­crats and around a dozen Sen­ate Demo­crats for months to try and get this done. Still, many of their con­gres­sion­al lead­ers have op­posed the deal on ideo­lo­gic­al grounds, ar­guing that the deal will ex­acer­bate in­come in­equal­ity and hurt Amer­ic­an jobs.

“My col­leagues who sup­port this le­gis­la­tion are act­ing in good faith based on what they be­lieve is right,” said Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic Lead­er Harry Re­id in a state­ment. “I simply dis­agree with them. Every day in this cham­ber, we make a choice about wheth­er we will serve large busi­ness in­terests or Amer­ica’s middle class. Today, I be­lieve we made the wrong choice.”

Asked by a re­port­er Tues­day what was next for the trade pack­age, Re­id said: “I am the wrong per­son to talk to. I hate the whole pro­gram. So, talk to some­body that likes it. I hate it.”

This art­icle has been up­dated.

Ben Geman contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
NO CHIEF JOB FOR HIM
Trump Wants Meadows in Congress
9 minutes ago
THE LATEST
DROPPED DISCRIMINATION LANGUAGE
Congress Reaches Agreement on Sexual Harassment Rules
14 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"House and Senate negotiators have reached a deal on a Capitol Hill sexual-harassment bill that would hold lawmakers personally responsible for harassment and retaliation." The key was dropping a provision that would have made members pay for "discrimination" claims.

Source:
SURVIVES NO CONFIDENCE VOTE
Theresa May Dodges Removal Amid Brexit Turmoil
19 minutes ago
THE LATEST
HEADS TO POTUS
House Passes Farm Bill
25 minutes ago
THE LATEST
SENATE BEGINNING DEBATE
Paul Ryan Says No to Yemen Funding Bill This Year
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

"House Speaker Paul Ryan on Wednesday pushed language through the House that will prevent lawmakers from taking up any resolution to end U.S. support for the war in Yemen this year. The language was passed just as the Senate was set to start debate on a resolution that aims to end U.S. involvement in Yemen, a response to anger over Saudi Arabia's involvement in the death of dissident Jamal Khashoggi."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login