Obama Warms to an Escape Route in the Syria Crisis

Marina Koren And Brian Resnick, National Journal
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Marina Koren and Brian Resnick, National Journal
Sept. 10, 2013, 5:02 a.m.

On Monday night, Pres­id­ent Obama flooded the net­works to make his case for a strike on Syr­ia, em­phas­iz­ing its nar­row­ness in di­min­ish­ing Syr­ia’s sus­pec­ted use of chem­ic­al weapons. Yet, earli­er in the day, he con­ceiv­ably was giv­en an out to the con­flict, with Rus­sia of­fer­ing to broker a deal to put the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment’s stock­pile of chem­ic­al weapons un­der “in­ter­na­tion­al con­trol.”

The pro­pos­i­tion has promp­ted Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev., to post­pone a Sen­ate vote on the au­thor­iz­a­tion of force from Wed­nes­day to Thursday, to al­low for a dip­lo­mat­ic way out of the situ­ation. Obama told Di­ane Saw­yer on ABC that the strikes may be less ef­fect­ive if Con­gress doesn’t back him, but that he hadn’t de­cided what he would do if the strikes are voted down.

In an in­ter­view with Fox News, Chris Wal­lace asked Obama three times if the pres­id­ent would delay a vote in Con­gress in the wake of the new in­form­a­tion. “I am go­ing to make sure that this does not change the cal­en­dar of de­bate in Con­gress,” Obama re­spon­ded. “Clearly it’s go­ing to take more time, partly be­cause the Amer­ic­an people aren’t con­vinced.”

NBC’s Sa­van­nah Gu­thrie asked Obama if he felt con­fid­ent about get­ting enough votes to push the res­ol­u­tion au­thor­iz­ing the use of force through Con­gress. “I wouldn’t say I’m con­fid­ent. I’m con­fid­ent that the mem­bers of Con­gress are tak­ing this is­sue very ser­i­ously, and they are do­ing their home­work. At a press con­fer­ence in Sweden last week, however, the pres­id­ent said he was sure Con­gress would ap­prove the meas­ure.

But per­haps there is some hope it won’t come to blows. To mul­tiple news out­lets, Obama re­peated that if the Rus­si­an deal can be veri­fied, it could de­ter a strike. At the same time, he said such a deal would not have come about without the loom­ing threat of U.S. mis­siles, echo­ing former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Rod­ham Clin­ton’s re­marks earli­er in the day. Here’s what he told Wolf Blitzer on CNN, a sen­ti­ment he shared in all of his in­ter­views:

If we can ac­com­plish this lim­ited goal without tak­ing mil­it­ary ac­tion, that would be my pref­er­ence. On the oth­er hand, if we don’t maybe main­tain and move for­ward with a cred­ible threat of mil­it­ary pres­sure, I do not think we will get the kind of move­ment I would like to see.

On Fox, Obama said the next step in­volves get­ting “ac­tu­al lan­guage” from the Rus­si­ans for a pro­pos­al that would take chem­ic­al weapons out of the As­sad re­gime’s hands. He para­phrased Ron­ald Re­agan’s “trust, but veri­fy,” a line the 40th pres­id­ent spoke in his 1989 farewell ad­dress about Amer­ica’s re­la­tion­ship with the So­viet Uni­on. “We’ll put this on a fast track,” Obama said of de­term­in­ing how “ser­i­ous” Rus­sia is about pres­sur­ing Syr­ia.

Obama also main­tained that the United States does not have to fear a re­tali­ation from As­sad in the wake of a strike (as As­sad had told Charlie Rose in an bizar­rely con­cur­rent in­ter­view on PBS). Obama told Blitzer:

As­sad doesn’t have a lot of cap­ab­il­ity. He has cap­ab­il­ity re­l­at­ive to chil­dren, he has cap­ab­il­ity re­l­at­ive to an op­pos­i­tion that is still get­ting it­self or­gan­ized and are not pro­fes­sion­ally trained fight­ers. He doesn’t have a cred­ible means to threaten the United States…. The no­tion that Mr. As­sad could sig­ni­fic­antly threaten the United States is just not the case.

Obama will con­tin­ue his press blitz from the White House on Tues­day night, when he ad­dresses a na­tion that largely dis­ap­proves of U.S. mil­it­ary in­ter­ven­tion in Syr­ia. In the end, pub­lic opin­ion may carry more weight in the pres­id­ent’s de­cision than murky pro­pos­als from over­seas. Obama told NBC, “I will eval­u­ate after that wheth­er or not we feel strongly enough about this that we are will­ing to move for­ward.”

What We're Following See More »
THE PRESIDENT’S POCKET
16th Charity Cancels Function at Mar-a-Lago
15 hours ago
THE LATEST
OVER N. KOREA NUCLEAR PROGRAMS
U.S. Imposes Sanctions on 16 Companies
16 hours ago
THE LATEST
U.N. REPORT REVEALS DETAILS
North Korean Chemical Weapons Shipments to Syria Intercepted
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"Two North Korean shipments to a Syrian government agency responsible for the country's chemical weapons program were intercepted in the past six months, according to a confidential United Nations report on North Korea sanctions violations."

Source:
PARTICIPATES IN TOWN HALL TONIGHT
Ryan: “There Are No Sides” on Charlottesville
1 days ago
THE LATEST

After taking fire for not forcefully condemning President Trump's statements on Charlottesville, Speaker Paul Ryan today issued a statement that takes issue with any "moral relativism" when it comes to Neo-Nazis. "There are no sides," he wrote. "There is no other argument. We will not tolerate this hateful ideology in our society." Ryan participates in a CNN town hall tonight from Racine, Wis.

Source:
TRUST FOR NATIONAL MALL SET TO REFURBISH SITE
New Jefferson Memorial Exhibit Will Acknowledge His Owning of Slaves
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

"An exhibit alongside the nation's chief memorial to Thomas Jefferson will receive an update that reflects 'the complexity' of his status as a founder of the United States and a slaveholder, according to stewards of the National Mall." The Trust for the National Mall, which works with the National Park Service to maintain the Mall, "has been planning to raise money to refurbish the National Park Service exhibit accompanying the memorial, which has deteriorated since its installment about 20 years ago." An official with the Trust told the Washington Examiner: "We can reflect the momentous contributions of someone like Thomas Jefferson, but also consider carefully the complexity of who he was. And that's not reflected right now in the exhibits."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login