Republicans and Democrats on the House Select Committee on Benghazi have a message for each other: What are you hiding?
The two parties are fighting over which side is truly a friend of openness in the latest House GOP-led probe of the 2012 attack in Libya that killed four Americans, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens
In the latest move, Democrats on the House Select Committee on Benghazi are seeking to boost political pressure on Republicans to release Sidney Blumenthal’s recent closed-door deposition before the panel.
In a letter Wednesday, all five of the panel’s Democrats ask the committee’s GOP chairman to schedule a public meeting and vote on a release of the daylong deposition of the Hillary Clinton ally.
In 2011 and 2012, Blumenthal sent a series of messages to Clinton about Libyan intelligence issues while she was secretary of State, and he recently turned over messages that hadn’t previously been provided to the committee by the State Department.
Democrats are objecting to Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy’s recent release of Blumenthal’s emails without the deposition transcript, arguing that the transcript would provide needed background and context. Their new letter says they have a right to “insist” on a vote.
“We are writing to officially invoke our right to insist on a vote of the Select Committee on our proposal to release the transcript of the deposition with Sidney Blumenthal pursuant to the Deposition Procedures for the Select Committee on the Events Surrounding the 2012 Terrorist Attack in Benghazi, which were adopted by the House and printed in the Congressional Record on May 9, 2014,” it states.
The letter argues that “the public record has been distorted by the selective release of Mr. Blumenthal’s emails without the full context of his deposition transcript.”
Gowdy has said he’ll consider the release and plans to hold a private meeting to discuss it, rather than the public session and vote that Democrats are now demanding. Gowdy’s spokesman struck back at Democrats Wednesday.
“Chairman Gowdy attempted to schedule a meeting so members could discuss this matter, but the Democrats chose to send out a press release instead. They remain uniquely focused on anything other than substantively advancing the Benghazi investigation,” spokesman Jamal Ware said.
While pledging to weigh the release, Gowdy laid out the case against release in a June 22 letter to committee Democrats. “Releasing transcripts can impact the recollections of other witnesses, jeopardize the efficacy of the investigation, alert witnesses to lines of inquiry best not made public, and publicize personal information,” Gowdy wrote.
And Gowdy, for his part, has repeatedly in recent days said that it’s the State Department and Democrats that are lacking in the transparency department.
On Tuesday, he took aim at State for failing, thus far, to say why about 60 emails that Blumenthal provided days before his deposition weren’t previously provided by State.
Gowdy wants to know whether State had them but did not produce them in response to earlier document requests or whether they weren’t provided by Clinton when she turned over emails from her private server to State late last year.
“State should immediately produce to the committee emails that should have been produced months ago or explain why it is not in possession of these emails from Secretary Clinton. Either response has ramifications toward a full public record. This should be neither complicated nor time consuming,” he said in a statement Tuesday.
State Department spokesman John Kirby has said in recent days that the department is reviewing the matter but has not provided a time frame.
More broadly, Gowdy has said State has largely failed, for months, to provide key documents requested by the panel, notably emails from 10 of Hillary Clinton’s senior aides at State.
Gowdy has also questioned Democrats’ commitment to openness. His July 22 letter to Elijah Cummings, the panel’s top Democrat, says Cummings’s commitment to transparency has not been “reinforced” with actions. He said Cummings should call on President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry for “complete, timely” production of documents.
“The failure to do so may allow one to conclude your call for transparency is more of a talking point than a committed principle,” Gowdy wrote.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.