The U.S. got into its confrontation with Syria over an allegedly unscripted statement from President Obama, and may now get out of it thanks to an off-the-cuff remark from Secretary of State John Kerry.
Obama set the stage for military intervention in the Syrian civil war last year with two words: “red line.” If we see “a whole bunch of [chemical] weapons moving around or being utilized,” that would be a “red line” that would “change my calculus,” Obama famously said. The definitiveness of the statement made it impossible for the president not to respond when he determined that forces loyal to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad used chemical weapons against civilians last month.
But The New York Times reported in May that Obama was never supposed to utter the words “red line.” One unnamed official said the comment was “unscripted,” while another said the idea was to “put a chill into the Assad regime without actually trapping the president into any predetermined action.” Whether or not Obama got ahead of himself, it didn’t really matter in the end as the “red line” became the administration’s official position and the genie couldn’t be put back into the bottle.
That is, except, perhaps by another unscripted remark from the Obama administration. As Foreign Policy‘s Yochi Dreazen wrote, Kerry may have “ad-lib[bed] his way out of war” Monday when he suggested that Syria could avoid air strikes if it gave up its chemical-weapons cache.
It was an offhanded remark that the State Department immediately tried to walk back. “Secretary Kerry was making a rhetorical argument about the impossibility and unlikelihood of Asad turning over chemical weapons,” spokesperson Jen Psaki said. But within hours, the Russian government offered to make it a reality, the Syrians said they’d play ball, and Obama himself endorsed it. Now it looks like a military confrontation may be averted, at least for the moment, thanks in part to Kerry’s slip of the tongue.
If it goes through (and it’s a big if, considering the technical difficulty of securing the weapons), it’s a would-be war bookended by verbal gaffes. Foreign policy by faux pas.
What We're Following See More »
President Obama became a surprise topic of contention toward the end of the Democratic debate, as Hillary Clinton reminded viewers that Sanders had challenged the progressive bona fides of President Obama in 2011 and suggested that someone might challenge him from the left. “The kind of criticism that we’ve heard from Senator Sanders about our president I expect from Republicans, I do not expect from someone running for the Democratic nomination to succeed President Obama,” she said. “Madame Secretary, that is a low blow,” replied Sanders, before getting in another dig during his closing statement: “One of us ran against Barack Obama. I was not that candidate.”
It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”
It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.
Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.