The United States is arguing that a retaliatory attack on Syrian President Bashar Assad’s regime could discourage North Korea from employing its own chemical arsenal in regional conflicts, the Associated Press reported on Tuesday.
Washington has been trying to persuade China to back a U.S. plan to carry out limited missile strikes against the Syrian military as punishment for its widely assumed large-scale Aug. 21 sarin gas attack on Syrian civilians just outside of Damascus.
A punishing military assault on the Assad regime will strengthen the global norm against the use of chemical weapons and send an important message to other countries in possession of such arms, U.S. Undersecretary for Defense Policy James Miller said during trip to Beijing.
“I emphasized the massive chemical weapons arsenal that North Korea has and that we didn’t want to live in a world in which North Korea felt that the threshold for chemical weapons usage had been lowered,” Miller told journalists in describing his Monday meeting with Wang Guanzhong, the People’s Liberation Army’s deputy chief of staff.
It is very much to China’s benefit that there is a “strong response to Assad’s clear and massive use of chemical weapons,” Miller said he told the Chinese military official.
The Chinese government is working with Russia to impede any U.N. Security Council resolution authorizing the use of force against Syria.
North Korea is believed to hold a substantial chemical arsenal, measuring between 2,500 and 5,000 metric tons of deadly poisons such as sarin nerve agent, mustard gas, hydrogen cyanide and phosgene, according to previous reports. Pyongyang has not signed the Chemical Weapons Convention, which prohibits the production, possession and usage of chemical arms.
- 1 Donald Trump Leaves a Car Wreck Behind
- 2 Emails May Be a Key to Addressing ‘Pay-to-Play’ Whispers at Clinton Foundation
- 3 How Politics Breaks Our Brains, and How We Can Put Them Back Together
- 4 What Can the U.S. Do in Ukraine? Not Much.
- 5 Outlook: Approps, Puerto Rico, and Defense Bills Top the Agenda
What We're Following See More »
"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."
After a lighthearted beginning, Donald Trump's appearance at the Al Smith charity dinner in New York "took a tough turn as the crowd repeatedly booed the GOP nominee for his sharp-edged jokes about his rival Hillary Clinton."
Evan McMullin came out on top in a Emerson College poll of Utah with 31% of the vote. Donald Trump came in second with 27%, while Hillary Clinton took third with 24%. Gary Johnson received 5% of the vote in the survey.
A new Quinnipiac University poll finds Hillary Clinton leading Donald Trump by seven percentage points, 47%-40%. Trump’s “lead among men and white voters all but” vanished from the university’s early October poll. A new PPRI/Brookings survey shows a much bigger lead, with Clinton up 51%-36%. And an IBD/TIPP poll leans the other way, showing a virtual dead heat, with Trump taking 41% of the vote to Clinton’s 40% in a four-way matchup.