How to Sell a Syrian Intervention to a Skeptical Public

In eight easy steps.

Members of the local Syrian community rally against the United States' involvement in Syria, Aug. 27, 2013 in Allentown, Pa. (AP Photo/Chris Post)
National Journal
Matt Berman, Marina Koren, Brian Resnick and Matt Vasilogambros
See more stories about...
Matt Berman Marina Koren Brian Resnick Matt Vasilogambros
Sept. 10, 2013, 5:53 p.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama faced a nearly im­possible mis­sion Tues­day night: con­vin­cing the Amer­ic­an pub­lic of the mer­it of something that even his White House isn’t totally sure about.

For the most part, the speech was a sum­mary of the tangled, rap­idly chan­ging events that led to this mo­ment. And this mo­ment is where the story can fork in two dir­ec­tions: Will there be a dip­lo­mat­ic solu­tion mas­saged in­to place by the Rus­si­ans and the United Na­tions, or will the United States strike? Obama, a pres­id­ent who says he has “a deeply held pref­er­ence for peace­ful solu­tions,” wants to leave the war op­tion open. The pres­id­ent said,

It’s too early to tell wheth­er this of­fer will suc­ceed, and any agree­ment must veri­fy that the As­sad re­gime keeps its com­mit­ments. But this ini­ti­at­ive has the po­ten­tial to re­move the threat of chem­ic­al weapons without the use of force, par­tic­u­larly be­cause Rus­sia is one of As­sad’s strongest al­lies. I have there­fore asked the lead­ers of Con­gress to post­pone a vote to au­thor­ize the use of force while we pur­sue this dip­lo­mat­ic path.

So, how did he sell his case against Syr­ia?

Step 1: Use graph­ic im­agery. In the be­gin­ning of his speech, the pres­id­ent al­luded to chil­dren “foam­ing at the mouth, gasp­ing for breath” and “a fath­er, clutch­ing his dead chil­dren, im­plor­ing them to get up and walk.” The im­ages from the chem­ic­al at­tack in Syr­ia were “sick­en­ing,” the pres­id­ent said. And he tried to make that case as vis­cer­ally as pos­sible, even ask­ing mem­bers of Con­gress and cit­izens tun­ing in to see the im­ages for them­selves. One of the pres­id­ent’s last lines of the speech ap­pealed to people’s own chil­dren, and wheth­er they would like to them af­fected by deadly gases.

Step 2: Use his­tory. Obama com­pared chem­ic­al-weapons use in Syr­ia to something Amer­ic­ans can agree was in­ex­cus­able: the use of deadly gas by the Nazis dur­ing the Holo­caust. “Be­cause these weapons can kill on a mass scale with no dis­tinc­tion between sol­dier and in­fant,” he said, “the civ­il­ized world spent a cen­tury work­ing to ban them.”

Obama also quoted a his­tor­ic­al lu­minary. To­ward the close of the speech, he ref­er­enced the 20th-cen­tury pres­id­ent most closely as­so­ci­ated to suc­cess­ful, jus­ti­fied war:

Frank­lin Roosevelt once said our na­tion­al de­term­in­a­tion to keep free of for­eign war and for­eign en­tan­gle­ments can­not pre­vent us from feel­ing deep con­cern when ideas and prin­ciples that we have cher­ished are chal­lenged.

Step 3: Ap­peal to hu­man­ity. The pres­id­ent isn’t blind to the fact that Amer­ic­ans are largely against his ad­min­is­tra­tion’s cur­rent stance on Syr­ia. But to help over­come that, the pres­id­ent ap­pealed to a lar­ger sense of hu­man­ity that not only com­pelled him to act, but made it seem in­sane not to. Ninety-eight per­cent of hu­man­ity pro­hib­its the use of chem­ic­al weapons, the pres­id­ent said. “On Au­gust 21, these ba­sic rules were vi­ol­ated. Along with our sense of com­mon hu­man­ity.”

Step 4: Level with the war-weary pub­lic. Again, the pres­id­ent knows his audi­ence, and he wasn’t shy about their over­whelm­ing opin­ions right now. “This na­tion is sick and tired of war,” he said. And how can he help that? “My an­swer is simple: I will not put Amer­ic­an boots on the ground in Syr­ia.” Con­trast­ing his ad­min­is­tra­tion’s pos­sible mil­it­ary plan with past op­er­a­tions, Obama said, “I will not pur­sue an open-ended ac­tion like Ir­aq or Afgh­anistan. I will not pur­sue a pro­longed air cam­paign like Libya or Kosovo.”

Step 5: Fre­quently Asked Ques­tions. To sell his po­s­i­tions to those who do not agree with a Syr­i­an in­ter­ven­tion, the pres­id­ent went to the mail­bag to ad­dress con­cerns. “I’ve read in let­ters that you’ve sent to me,” he said. “First, many of you have asked, won’t this put us on a slip­pery slope to an­oth­er war?”

An­oth­er ques­tion he ad­dressed: “Why not leave this to oth­er coun­tries?” This came up dir­ectly in a CBS News/New York Times poll re­leased Tues­day morn­ing which found that 62 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans don’t think the U.S. should take the lead in for­eign af­fairs. Obama used this op­por­tun­ity to make the case that the United States isn’t go­ing it alone. It was here when the pres­id­ent brought up the bur­geon­ing chem­ic­al-weapons deal over the last few days, in­volving ne­go­ti­ations with Rus­sia. And he used the full weight of U.S. demo­cracy to make the case for this pos­sible path:

This ini­ti­at­ive has the po­ten­tial to re­move the threat of chem­ic­al weapons without the use of force par­tic­u­larly be­cause Rus­sia is one of As­sad’s strongest al­lies. I have there­fore asked the lead­ers of Con­gress to post­pone a vote to au­thor­ize the use of force while we pur­sue this dip­lo­mat­ic path.

Step 6: Ap­peal to both sides of the aisle. Act like you are in the cen­ter. To­ward the end of his re­marks, Obama ex­pli­citly tried to po­s­i­tion him­self and his ad­min­is­tra­tion’s view on Syr­ia as be­ing in the cen­ter.

To my friends on the right, I ask you to re­con­cile your com­mit­ment to Amer­ica’s mil­it­ary might with the fail­ure to act when a cause is so plainly just. To­night, my friends on the left, I ask you to re­con­cile your be­lief in free­dom and dig­nity for all people with those im­ages of chil­dren in pain and go­ing still on a cold hos­pit­al floor, for some­times res­ol­u­tions and state­ments of con­dem­na­tion are simply not enough.

Step 7: Re­as­sure the pub­lic in the Amer­ic­an ar­sen­al. Obama’s speech bal­anced a lot of con­flict­ing points. We must be strong in our re­solve for ac­tion, but be amen­able to peace. We must strive to di­min­ish the chem­ic­al-weapons stock­pile, but without the in­ten­tion of end­ing the civil war. We will strike hard, but to a lim­ited end. What a dance of rhet­or­ic. But he was clear about the might of the Amer­ic­an mil­it­ary.

“Let me make something clear, the United States mil­it­ary doesn’t do pin­pricks,” he said, bor­row­ing a line from Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry testi­fy­ing be­fore Con­gress earli­er in the day be­fore the House Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee. “Even a lim­ited strike will send a mes­sage to As­sad that no oth­er na­tion can de­liv­er.”

But then, again, he qual­i­fied that use of force, fol­low­ing up with, “I don’t think we should re­move an­oth­er dic­tat­or with force.”

Last Step: Ap­peal to Amer­ic­an ex­cep­tion­al­ism. “Amer­ica is not the world’s po­lice­man,” the pres­id­ent said at the end of his re­marks. “Ter­rible things hap­pen across the globe. And it is bey­ond our means to right every wrong.” But the U.S., the pres­id­ent ar­gued, is still uniquely suited to make the world a bet­ter place.

When with mod­est ef­fort and risk, we can stop chil­dren from be­ing gassed to death, and thereby make our own chil­dren safer over the long run, I be­lieve we should act. That’s what makes Amer­ica dif­fer­ent. That’s what makes us ex­cep­tion­al. With hu­mil­ity but with re­solve, let us nev­er lose sight of that es­sen­tial truth.

Hit­ting the widest pos­sible audi­ence, the speech was the White House’s most vis­ible chance to con­vince an Amer­ic­an pub­lic and hordes of law­makers who don’t agree. Ac­cord­ing to a Pew poll re­leased Monday, nearly two-thirds of Amer­ic­ans are op­posed to a U.S. strike against Syr­ia.

While just 31 per­cent of Amer­ic­ans ap­prove of Obama’s hand­ling of the situ­ation, his job-ap­prov­al rat­ing on for­eign af­fairs re­mains at a steady 42 per­cent, ac­cord­ing to a Gal­lup poll. Pew, mean­while, has Obama’s ap­prov­al rat­ing on for­eign policy at an all-time low, at 33 per­cent.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4432) }}

What We're Following See More »
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
17 hours ago

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
1 days ago

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
1 days ago

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
2 days ago
California: It’s Not Over Yet
2 days ago

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.