Vladimir Putin Wrote an Op-Ed on Syria for The New York Times

Abby Ohlheiser, Atlantic Wire
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Abby Ohlheiser, Atlantic Wire
Sept. 12, 2013, 6:02 a.m.

Rus­si­an Pres­id­ent Vladi­mir Putin, already es­tab­lished as a prom­in­ent artist, sing­er, and judo mas­ter, has now ad­ded New York Times con­trib­ut­or to his re­sume. As the U.S. steps back from a plan to bomb Syr­ia, Putin de­cided ” to speak dir­ectly to the Amer­ic­an people” in a New York Times op-ed pub­lished Wed­nes­day even­ing. After re­mind­ing Amer­ica of the good times — “[we] de­feated the Nazis to­geth­er,” he writes — Putin launches in­to an ar­gu­ment for “cau­tion,” claim­ing that a U.S. strike against Syr­ia could “throw the en­tire sys­tem of in­ter­na­tion­al law and or­der out of bal­ance.”  Here’s more: 

The po­ten­tial strike by the United States against Syr­ia, des­pite strong op­pos­i­tion from many coun­tries and ma­jor polit­ic­al and re­li­gious lead­ers, in­clud­ing the pope, will res­ult in more in­no­cent vic­tims and es­cal­a­tion, po­ten­tially spread­ing the con­flict far bey­ond Syr­ia’s bor­ders. A strike would in­crease vi­ol­ence and un­leash a new wave of ter­ror­ism. It could un­der­mine mul­ti­lat­er­al ef­forts to re­solve the Ir­a­ni­an nuc­le­ar prob­lem and the Is­raeli-Palestini­an con­flict and fur­ther destabil­ize the Middle East and North Africa.

Of course, the Rus­si­an pres­id­ent is already ad­dress­ing an Amer­ic­an pub­lic skep­tic­al of any plan to in­ter­vene in Syr­ia, and that might be the point: as Syr­i­an pres­id­ent Bashar al-As­sad tried to do in an in­ter­view with Charlie Rose earli­er this week, Putin is likely sens­ing the dir­ec­tion of the wind of U.S. pub­lic opin­ion here, and try­ing to ap­peal to it. That’s even as Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry heads to Rus­sia to work on a pos­sible dip­lo­mat­ic solu­tion to the Syr­i­an situ­ation. And while he’s at it, Putin weighs in on what he thinks Amer­ica stands for in an­oth­er key pas­sage: 

It is alarm­ing that mil­it­ary in­ter­ven­tion in in­tern­al con­flicts in for­eign coun­tries has be­come com­mon­place for the United States. Is it in Amer­ica’s long-term in­terest? I doubt it. Mil­lions around the world in­creas­ingly see Amer­ica not as a mod­el of demo­cracy but as re­ly­ing solely on brute force, cob­bling co­ali­tions to­geth­er un­der the slo­gan “you’re either with us or against us.”

At the same time, Putin in­serts the latest ver­sion of an ar­gu­ment that’s led to the coun­try’s re­peated use of a veto on the U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil against pretty much any res­ol­u­tion con­demning the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment, es­pe­cially after the Au­gust 21st chem­ic­al at­tacks. “There is every reas­on to be­lieve it was used not by the Syr­i­an Army,” Putin writes, but by op­pos­i­tion forces, to pro­voke in­ter­ven­tion by their power­ful for­eign pat­rons, who would be sid­ing with the fun­da­ment­al­ists.” Rus­sia has been one of Syr­ia’s strongest al­lies through the con­flict in the coun­try.

Putin also finds room to close with a cri­ti­cism of Amer­ic­an Ex­cep­tion­al­ism, a no­tion Pres­id­ent Obama gave slightly more than a dog whistle to in his Tues­day ad­dress to the coun­try:

My work­ing and per­son­al re­la­tion­ship with Pres­id­ent Obama is marked by grow­ing trust. I ap­pre­ci­ate this. I care­fully stud­ied his ad­dress to the na­tion on Tues­day. And I would rather dis­agree with a case he made on Amer­ic­an ex­cep­tion­al­ism, stat­ing that the United States’ policy is “what makes Amer­ica dif­fer­ent. It’s what makes us ex­cep­tion­al.” It is ex­tremely dan­ger­ous to en­cour­age people to see them­selves as ex­cep­tion­al, whatever the mo­tiv­a­tion. There are big coun­tries and small coun­tries, rich and poor, those with long demo­crat­ic tra­di­tions and those still find­ing their way to demo­cracy. Their policies dif­fer, too.

He closes with an ap­peal that, one might sus­pect, will fall flat to the ears of any of Rus­sia’s LGBT res­id­ents, who cur­rently face a series of highly re­strict­ive laws sup­por­ted by Putin and his gov­ern­ment: “We are all dif­fer­ent, but when we ask for the Lord’s bless­ings, we must not for­get that God cre­ated us equal.” 

Re­prin­ted with per­mis­sion from the At­lantic Wire. The ori­gin­al story can be found here.

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
3 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
3 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
5 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
5 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login