Vladimir Putin Wrote an Op-Ed on Syria for The New York Times

Abby Ohlheiser, Atlantic Wire
See more stories about...
Abby Ohlheiser, Atlantic Wire
Sept. 12, 2013, 6:02 a.m.

Rus­si­an Pres­id­ent Vladi­mir Putin, already es­tab­lished as a prom­in­ent artist, sing­er, and judo mas­ter, has now ad­ded New York Times con­trib­ut­or to his re­sume. As the U.S. steps back from a plan to bomb Syr­ia, Putin de­cided ” to speak dir­ectly to the Amer­ic­an people” in a New York Times op-ed pub­lished Wed­nes­day even­ing. After re­mind­ing Amer­ica of the good times — “[we] de­feated the Nazis to­geth­er,” he writes — Putin launches in­to an ar­gu­ment for “cau­tion,” claim­ing that a U.S. strike against Syr­ia could “throw the en­tire sys­tem of in­ter­na­tion­al law and or­der out of bal­ance.”  Here’s more: 

The po­ten­tial strike by the United States against Syr­ia, des­pite strong op­pos­i­tion from many coun­tries and ma­jor polit­ic­al and re­li­gious lead­ers, in­clud­ing the pope, will res­ult in more in­no­cent vic­tims and es­cal­a­tion, po­ten­tially spread­ing the con­flict far bey­ond Syr­ia’s bor­ders. A strike would in­crease vi­ol­ence and un­leash a new wave of ter­ror­ism. It could un­der­mine mul­ti­lat­er­al ef­forts to re­solve the Ir­a­ni­an nuc­le­ar prob­lem and the Is­raeli-Palestini­an con­flict and fur­ther destabil­ize the Middle East and North Africa.

Of course, the Rus­si­an pres­id­ent is already ad­dress­ing an Amer­ic­an pub­lic skep­tic­al of any plan to in­ter­vene in Syr­ia, and that might be the point: as Syr­i­an pres­id­ent Bashar al-As­sad tried to do in an in­ter­view with Charlie Rose earli­er this week, Putin is likely sens­ing the dir­ec­tion of the wind of U.S. pub­lic opin­ion here, and try­ing to ap­peal to it. That’s even as Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry heads to Rus­sia to work on a pos­sible dip­lo­mat­ic solu­tion to the Syr­i­an situ­ation. And while he’s at it, Putin weighs in on what he thinks Amer­ica stands for in an­oth­er key pas­sage: 

It is alarm­ing that mil­it­ary in­ter­ven­tion in in­tern­al con­flicts in for­eign coun­tries has be­come com­mon­place for the United States. Is it in Amer­ica’s long-term in­terest? I doubt it. Mil­lions around the world in­creas­ingly see Amer­ica not as a mod­el of demo­cracy but as re­ly­ing solely on brute force, cob­bling co­ali­tions to­geth­er un­der the slo­gan “you’re either with us or against us.”

At the same time, Putin in­serts the latest ver­sion of an ar­gu­ment that’s led to the coun­try’s re­peated use of a veto on the U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil against pretty much any res­ol­u­tion con­demning the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment, es­pe­cially after the Au­gust 21st chem­ic­al at­tacks. “There is every reas­on to be­lieve it was used not by the Syr­i­an Army,” Putin writes, but by op­pos­i­tion forces, to pro­voke in­ter­ven­tion by their power­ful for­eign pat­rons, who would be sid­ing with the fun­da­ment­al­ists.” Rus­sia has been one of Syr­ia’s strongest al­lies through the con­flict in the coun­try.

Putin also finds room to close with a cri­ti­cism of Amer­ic­an Ex­cep­tion­al­ism, a no­tion Pres­id­ent Obama gave slightly more than a dog whistle to in his Tues­day ad­dress to the coun­try:

My work­ing and per­son­al re­la­tion­ship with Pres­id­ent Obama is marked by grow­ing trust. I ap­pre­ci­ate this. I care­fully stud­ied his ad­dress to the na­tion on Tues­day. And I would rather dis­agree with a case he made on Amer­ic­an ex­cep­tion­al­ism, stat­ing that the United States’ policy is “what makes Amer­ica dif­fer­ent. It’s what makes us ex­cep­tion­al.” It is ex­tremely dan­ger­ous to en­cour­age people to see them­selves as ex­cep­tion­al, whatever the mo­tiv­a­tion. There are big coun­tries and small coun­tries, rich and poor, those with long demo­crat­ic tra­di­tions and those still find­ing their way to demo­cracy. Their policies dif­fer, too.

He closes with an ap­peal that, one might sus­pect, will fall flat to the ears of any of Rus­sia’s LGBT res­id­ents, who cur­rently face a series of highly re­strict­ive laws sup­por­ted by Putin and his gov­ern­ment: “We are all dif­fer­ent, but when we ask for the Lord’s bless­ings, we must not for­get that God cre­ated us equal.” 

Re­prin­ted with per­mis­sion from the At­lantic Wire. The ori­gin­al story can be found here.

What We're Following See More »
Inside the AP’s Election Operation
2 hours ago
What’s the Average Household Income of a Trump Voter?
2 hours ago

Seventy-two thousand dollars, according to FiveThirtyEight. That's higher than the national average, as well as the average Clinton or Sanders voter, but lower than the average Kasich voter.

How Coal Country Went from Blue to Red
4 hours ago
History Already Being Less Kind to Hastert’s Leadership
7 hours ago

In light of his recent confessions, the speakership of Dennis Hastert is being judged far more harshly. The New York Times' Carl Hulse notes that in hindsight, Hastert now "fares poorly" on a number of fronts, from his handling of the Mark Foley page scandal to "an explosion" of earmarks to the weakening of committee chairmen. "Even his namesake Hastert rule—the informal standard that no legislation should be brought to a vote without the support of a majority of the majority — has come to be seen as a structural barrier to compromise."

Trump Ill Prepared for General Election
7 hours ago

Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."