Yes, the headline on this article could have made a “Watergate” pun. But we’re feeling restrained.
Michelle Obama on Thursday kicked off the latest in her series of healthy-living initiatives. It’s real simple: She wants Americans to drink one more glass of water a day. That’s it. Seems reasonable, right?
“Drink just one more glass of water a day and you can make a real difference for your health, your energy, and the way you feel,” reads a statement from the first lady.
If that sounds a bit like an infomercial pitch — it might be. Several health experts and writers were saying Thursday that the claim isn’t built on much hard science.
“There really isn’t data to support this,” said Dr. Stanley Goldfarb of the University of Pennsylvania. “I think, unfortunately, frankly, they’re not basing this on really hard science. It’s not a very scientific approach they’ve taken.”¦ To make it a major public health effort, I think I would say it’s bizarre.”
Here’s the problem, as The Atlantic‘s health editor James Hamblin (an M.D.) points out: There is no daily recommended intake for water. A study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention finds that while four cups of water is a moderate amount, “individual water intake needs vary wldely.” And the Mayo Clinic’s recommendation is more qualitative than quantitative: drink enough water so you don’t feel thirsty and your pee doesn’t fluoresce.
It could be that the first lady is shying away from a campaign that explicitly tells people to drink less sugary drinks and replace that Pepsi with a water (as it’s been proven controversial to both insult an industry and tell people what not to do). But perhaps the initiative wouldn’t provoke as much skepticism if the White House did a better job providing a compelling scientific reason as to why more water is better.
Hamblin relates this exchange between a reporter and White House chef and first lady collaborator Sam Kass.
One of my colleagues asked the question that was on my tongue: What are the health benefits you refer to?
Kass replied, “I think the science and evidence about hydration abounds. Starting with headaches, it leads to many more conditions. But this isn’t a public health campaign. We think that being positive is most important, not getting into all the details about what a glass of water can do for you, is the message.”
To be fair, Kass is a chef, not a scientist, and that was off the cuff. But if you’re a national policy adviser on nutrition, and launching a campaign whose singular objective is to tell 314 million people to drink more water, your cuff should have some data that says more water is better.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”