Michelle Obama Receives Blowback … Over Water

A seemingly innocuous initiative to get people to drink more of the stuff has stirred up some skepticism.

National Journal
Brian Resnick
See more stories about...
Brian Resnick
Sept. 12, 2013, 9:06 a.m.

Yes, the head­line on this art­icle could have made a “Wa­ter­gate” pun. But we’re feel­ing re­strained.

Michelle Obama on Thursday kicked off the latest in her series of healthy-liv­ing ini­ti­at­ives. It’s real simple: She wants Amer­ic­ans to drink one more glass of wa­ter a day. That’s it. Seems reas­on­able, right?

“Drink just one more glass of wa­ter a day and you can make a real dif­fer­ence for your health, your en­ergy, and the way you feel,” reads a state­ment from the first lady.

If that sounds a bit like an in­fomer­cial pitch — it might be. Sev­er­al health ex­perts and writers were say­ing Thursday that the claim isn’t built on much hard sci­ence.

From Politico:

“There really isn’t data to sup­port this,” said Dr. Stan­ley Gold­farb of the Uni­versity of Pennsylvania. “I think, un­for­tu­nately, frankly, they’re not basing this on really hard sci­ence. It’s not a very sci­entif­ic ap­proach they’ve taken.”¦ To make it a ma­jor pub­lic health ef­fort, I think I would say it’s bizarre.”

Here’s the prob­lem, as The At­lantic‘s health ed­it­or James Ham­blin (an M.D.) points out: There is no daily re­com­men­ded in­take for wa­ter. A study from the Cen­ters for Dis­ease Con­trol and Pre­ven­tion finds that while four cups of wa­ter is a mod­er­ate amount, “in­di­vidu­al wa­ter in­take needs vary wldely.” And the Mayo Clin­ic’s re­com­mend­a­tion is more qual­it­at­ive than quant­it­at­ive: drink enough wa­ter so you don’t feel thirsty and your pee doesn’t fluor­esce.

It could be that the first lady is shy­ing away from a cam­paign that ex­pli­citly tells people to drink less sug­ary drinks and re­place that Pep­si with a wa­ter (as it’s been proven con­tro­ver­sial to both in­sult an in­dustry and tell people what not to do). But per­haps the ini­ti­at­ive wouldn’t pro­voke as much skep­ti­cism if the White House did a bet­ter job provid­ing a com­pel­ling sci­entif­ic reas­on as to why more wa­ter is bet­ter.

Ham­blin relates this ex­change between a re­port­er and White House chef and first lady col­lab­or­at­or Sam Kass.

One of my col­leagues asked the ques­tion that was on my tongue: What are the health be­ne­fits you refer to?

Kass replied, “I think the sci­ence and evid­ence about hy­dra­tion abounds. Start­ing with head­aches, it leads to many more con­di­tions. But this isn’t a pub­lic health cam­paign. We think that be­ing pos­it­ive is most im­port­ant, not get­ting in­to all the de­tails about what a glass of wa­ter can do for you, is the mes­sage.”

To be fair, Kass is a chef, not a sci­ent­ist, and that was off the cuff. But if you’re a na­tion­al policy ad­viser on nu­tri­tion, and launch­ing a cam­paign whose sin­gu­lar ob­ject­ive is to tell 314 mil­lion people to drink more wa­ter, your cuff should have some data that says more wa­ter is bet­ter.

What We're Following See More »
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
7 hours ago

Carolyn Kaster/AP

When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
8 hours ago

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
9 hours ago

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
10 hours ago

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
13 hours ago

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”