Senate’s Energy-Efficiency Bill Bogged Down in Unrelated Amendments

Sen. David Vitter, R-La., left, looks on as Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La. speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday June 18, 2008, to discuss Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita recovery money. 
National Journal
Alex Brown
Sept. 15, 2013, 8:38 a.m.

Sen. Dav­id Vit­ter, R-La., has ef­fect­ively taken host­age the Sen­ate’s en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency bill, stalling its pro­gress as he in­sists on a vote on his amend­ment to weak­en the Af­ford­able Care Act. But his isn’t the only amend­ment ty­ing po­lar­iz­ing is­sues to the oth­er­wise un­con­tro­ver­sial bill.

One such pro­pos­al, led by Sens. Mary Landrieu, D-La., and John Ho­even, R-N.D., would pres­sure Obama to ap­prove the Key­stone XL pipeline. Six Re­pub­lic­ans and three Demo­crats also signed on to the amend­ment, which is es­sen­tially a non­bind­ing state­ment of sup­port.

Oth­er amend­ments have noth­ing to do with en­ergy at all. Six GOP amend­ments, in­clud­ing Vit­ter’s, seek to lim­it, delay, or out­right block the Af­ford­able Care Act. An­oth­er, pro­posed by Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, would re­form set­tle­ments un­der the En­dangered Spe­cies Act.

Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev., com­plained about the ex­traneous pro­pos­als on the Sen­ate floor Thursday. “There’s not a single amend­ment that’s been al­lowed to be offered in this le­gis­la­tion that has any­thing to do with en­ergy,” he said.

But most of the Re­pub­lic­an-pro­posed amend­ments did have an en­ergy fo­cus — just likely not in a way that would would meet the bill’s “en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency” la­bel. Amend­ments filed Wed­nes­day and Thursday in­cluded 45 with solely GOP spon­sors. Twenty-nine of those — ex­clud­ing the ones aimed at the Af­ford­able Care Act — would lim­it agen­cies’ reg­u­lat­ing power; cut or elim­in­ate ex­ist­ing reg­u­la­tions; slash or con­sol­id­ate green pro­grams; give states more ways around fed­er­al reg­u­la­tions; or re­duce grants, loans, and tax cred­its for en­vir­on­ment­al ef­forts.

One such amend­ment, pro­posed by Sen. John Thune, R-S.D., would pro­hib­it the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency from en­act­ing reg­u­la­tions with more than $1 bil­lion in com­pli­ance costs without first gain­ing con­gres­sion­al ap­prov­al. That and a sim­il­ar amend­ment backed by Sens. Dean Heller, R-Nev., and Jeff Flake, R-Ar­iz., closely re­semble the En­ergy Con­sumers Re­lief Act that passed the GOP-con­trolled House earli­er this year.

Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., pro­posed a re­peal of the re­new­able-fuel stand­ard, while Sen. James In­hofe, R-Okla., sub­mit­ted his own plan al­low­ing states to opt out of it. An­oth­er plan grant­ing states ex­tra power would pre­vent EPA from over­rid­ing state pro­grams to con­trol haze; that amend­ment was pro­posed by Sen. Mi­chael En­zi, R-Wyo. And a pair of amend­ments in­tro­duced by Sens. John Bar­rasso, R-Wyo., and Roy Blunt, R-Mo., seek to pre­vent es­tim­ates of the so­cial cost of car­bon — a cal­cu­la­tion to as­sess the eco­nom­ic im­pact of emis­sions — from be­ing used in agency rule­mak­ing.

Re­pub­lic­ans wer­en’t the only ones pro­pos­ing off-top­ic amend­ments. Sen. Bar­bara Box­er, D-Cal­if., called for a halt to con­gres­sion­al pay if le­gis­lat­ors fail to raise the debt lim­it. Mean­while, sev­er­al of her fel­low Demo­crats hail­ing from red states joined with Re­pub­lic­ans on amend­ments lim­it­ing fed­er­al reg­u­la­tion. Sen. Heidi Heitkamp, D-N.D., teamed with Ho­even in an ef­fort to block new reg­u­la­tions for oil and gas ex­plor­a­tion on fed­er­al lands. An­oth­er bi­par­tis­an state pair­ing saw Sen. Robert Ca­sey, D-Pa., join Toomey on an amend­ment to ex­empt power plants fueled by coal wastes from fed­er­al emis­sion stand­ards.

A few amend­ments were ac­tu­ally re­lated to the bill’s en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency goals. Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., sub­mit­ted a par­tially hand­writ­ten pro­pos­al to re­quire fed­er­al work­ers to turn off the lights and un­plug elec­tric­al devices at the end of the day. An­oth­er amend­ment ad­ded by Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., would man­date dis­clos­ures of en­ergy us­age by all fed­er­al build­ings. Sev­er­al oth­er Demo­crat­ic amend­ments of­fer grant and loan pro­grams for con­ser­va­tion and en­ergy-sav­ings pro­jects.

In all, sen­at­ors in­tro­duced roughly 80 amend­ments to the bill Wed­nes­day and Thursday. Vit­ter’s may be get­ting all the at­ten­tion, but the Sen­ate will still have plenty of di­vis­ive is­sues to dis­cuss if he drops his amend­ment.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×