Obama on the Economy 5 Years Later: ‘We’re Not Near Where We Need to Be’

Five years after the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the coming-out party for the Great Recession, the president says there’s more he can do.

President Obama during his meeting with Kuwait Amir Sheik Sabah Al Ahmed Al Sabah in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, Friday, Sept. 13, 2013. 
National Journal
Matt Berman
See more stories about...
Matt Berman
Sept. 15, 2013, 6:45 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama launched a de­fense of the eco­nom­ic pro­gress un­der his ad­min­is­tra­tion Sunday on ABC’s This Week with George Stephan­o­poulos, while still ac­know­ledging how much there is left to be done. Obama’s in­ter­view comes five years after the col­lapse of Leh­man Broth­ers kicked off the fin­an­cial crisis at the heart of the 2007-09 re­ces­sion. That re­ces­sion, Obama said Sunday, was in some ways “worse than what happened in the 1930s.”

But, pre­view­ing a Monday Rose Garden speech, Obama ran off a string of ac­com­plish­ments:

We came in, sta­bil­ized the situ­ation. We’ve now had 42 straight months of growth. Sev­en and a half mil­lion new jobs cre­ated. Five hun­dred thou­sand jobs in man­u­fac­tur­ing, 370,000 jobs in an auto in­dustry that had com­pletely col­lapsed. The bank­ing sys­tem works, it is giv­ing loans to com­pan­ies who can get cred­it. And so we have seen, I think, un­doubtedly pro­gress across the board.

“But what is also true,” the pres­id­ent said, “is that we’re not near where we need to be.” The pres­id­ent poin­ted to long-term trends in the U.S. eco­nomy, where in­equal­ity has bal­looned since 1979. Say­ing that he’s cap­able of stop­ing those trends, Obama called out a por­tion of Con­gress “whose policies don’t just wanna leave things alone, they ac­tu­ally want to ac­cel­er­ate these trends.”

Sunday isn’t just the an­niversary of Leh­man col­lapsing and the eco­nom­ic tur­moil shift­ing in­to warp speed. It’s also five years to the day after then-Re­pub­lic­an pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate John Mc­Cain said that “the fun­da­ment­als of our eco­nomy are strong.”

Can­did­ate Obama, for his part, chided the Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion on Sept. 15, 2008, for policies that “shred­ded con­sumer pro­tec­tions” and “loosened over­sight and reg­u­la­tion and en­cour­aged out­sized bo­nuses to CEOs,” set­ting up what would be­come his pres­id­en­tial push for fin­an­cial re­form. “The res­ult,” he said then, “is the most ser­i­ous fin­an­cial crisis since the Great De­pres­sion.”

Mc­Cain was ob­vi­ously wrong about the eco­nomy then, and five years later, there’s no one who would dare re­peat the claim now.

It may be something of a tru­ism, but one of the most in­cred­ible things about the 2007-09 re­ces­sion is just how much of a slough the re­cov­ery has been. Take this newly up­dated chart from the Cen­ter on Budget and Policy Pri­or­it­ies, com­par­ing the re­cov­er­ies from the four most re­cent re­ces­sions:

The un­em­ploy­ment rate in Septem­ber 2008 was 6.1 per­cent — up from a re­l­at­ively stable 5 per­cent that had been the peak un­em­ploy­ment for the 30 months pre­ced­ing Decem­ber 2007. The un­em­ploy­ment rate stead­ily rose throughout 2008 and the be­gin­ning of 2009, spik­ing at 10.2 per­cent in Oc­to­ber 2009.

We still haven’t got­ten back to the prere­ces­sion levels of un­em­ploy­ment. We haven’t even got­ten back to the mid-re­ces­sion un­em­ploy­ment of five years ago. The em­ploy­ment pic­ture for this Au­gust was par­tic­u­larly bleak, with an Obama-pres­id­ency-low un­em­ploy­ment rate of 7.3 per­cent mask­ing sharp down­ward re­vi­sions to the pre­vi­ous months’ jobs gains. At Au­gust’s rate of job growth, it’d take nearly two years for the eco­nomy to get back to 5 per­cent un­em­ploy­ment.

One of the darkest sides of the re­ces­sion has been the slow re­cov­ery of the long-term un­em­ployed — people who have been out of work for at least 27 weeks. As the CBPP shows, the rates of long-term-un­em­ployed Amer­ic­ans are still un­pre­ced­en­ted:

Last month, the long-term un­em­ployed ac­coun­ted for 37.9 per­cent of the total un­em­ployed, about un­changed from the month be­fore. Over the last year, the num­ber of long-term-un­em­ployed Amer­ic­ans has dropped by 733,000 to 4.3 mil­lion people in Au­gust.

Obama is ob­vi­ously right to say the eco­nomy today isn’t as bad as it was five years ago. Many people have come back from the re­ces­sion’s depths. Even former Leh­man CEO Dick Fuld is sort-of back, push­ing a chem­ic­al-re­cyc­ling penny stock. But the truth is, five years after the col­lapse of Leh­man Broth­ers, the re­cov­ery from the Great Re­ces­sion has been any­thing but equal.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4440) }}

What We're Following See More »
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
21 minutes ago

Carolyn Kaster/AP

When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
47 minutes ago

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 hours ago

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 hours ago

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
5 hours ago

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”