Harry Reid’s Backing Heightens Controversy Over Energy Nominee

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev. speaks with reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, June 4, 2013, following a Democratic strategy session.
National Journal
Sept. 16, 2013, 6:01 p.m.

The ap­par­ent be­hind-the-scenes in­volve­ment of Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev., in the se­lec­tion of Pres­id­ent Obama’s nom­in­ee to lead an ob­scure but power­ful fed­er­al en­ergy agency has heightened the drama in an already con­tro­ver­sial con­firm­a­tion pro­cess that be­gins in earn­est on Tues­day.

The agency, the Fed­er­al En­ergy Reg­u­lat­ory Com­mis­sion, is es­pe­cially im­port­ant to Re­id’s state, which re­lies on FERC to ap­prove trans­mis­sion sys­tems for its grow­ing re­new­able-en­ergy sec­tor. The nom­in­ee, Ron Binz, is re­portedly close friends with out­go­ing FERC Chair­man Jon Welling­hoff, who is from Nevada and is in turn close friends with Re­id.

Binz, a former chair of the Col­or­ado Pub­lic Util­it­ies Com­mis­sion, is ex­pec­ted to face a gruel­ing con­firm­a­tion battle Tues­day be­fore the Sen­ate En­ergy and Nat­ur­al Re­sources Com­mit­tee. In re­cent months, a pub­lic-re­la­tions war has broken out between Binz’s de­tract­ors and back­ers. Op­pon­ents in­clude the Wall Street Journ­al ed­it­or­i­al page and con­ser­vat­ive groups such as the Amer­ic­an En­ergy Al­li­ance and the In­sti­tute for En­ergy Re­search; sup­port­ers in­clude left-lean­ing groups such as the Cali­for­nia-based Green Tech Ac­tion Fund and VennSquared Com­mu­nic­a­tions, based in Wash­ing­ton.

FERC over­sees in­ter­state power trans­mis­sion and oil and gas pipelines, as well as hy­dro­elec­tri­city pro­jects. While it does not have a dir­ect role in poli­cy­mak­ing, it has be­come a proxy in the fight over Obama’s cli­mate-change agenda.

Binz is ex­pec­ted to face ques­tion­ing about com­ments he’s made on nat­ur­al gas, call­ing it a “dead end,” and about his role in de­vel­op­ing a Col­or­ado law that aimed to shut down coal-fired power plants and shift to nat­ur­al gas in­stead. In par­tic­u­lar, Demo­crat­ic Sens. Joe Manchin of West Vir­gin­ia and Mary Landrieu of Louisi­ana, who have not yet taken a pub­lic po­s­i­tion on Binz, may well have con­cerns about his views on fossil fuels.

How Manchin and Landrieu ul­ti­mately vote on Binz will be key, but the sen­at­or who mat­ters most in his con­firm­a­tion pro­cess is Re­id.

On Fri­day, Na­tion­al Journ­al Daily re­por­ted that Re­id had per­suaded the White House to drop its ini­tial pick to head FERC, cur­rent Demo­crat­ic Com­mis­sion­er John Nor­ris, in fa­vor of Binz, cit­ing an in­ter­view Nor­ris did with the trade pub­lic­a­tion Trans­mis­sion Hub.

“Re­id’s chief of staff in­formed me that Re­id in­ter­vened with the White House to stop my ap­point­ment as chair be­cause, as told to me by his chief of staff, I was “˜too pro-coal,’ “ Nor­ris told Trans­mis­sion Hub. Nor­ris also told the pub­lic­a­tion that he be­lieves his nom­in­a­tion was blocked be­cause Re­id wanted a FERC chair­man from a West­ern state.

Kristen Orth­man, spokes­wo­man for Re­id’s of­fice, denied Nor­ris’s claims. “Un­for­tu­nately Com­mis­sion­er Nor­ris is wrongly blam­ing oth­ers and mak­ing ac­cus­a­tions that are not ac­cur­ate,” Orth­man said in an e-mail to Na­tion­al Journ­al Daily on Sat­urday.

But a Re­pub­lic­an en­ergy lob­by­ist, MWR Strategies Pres­id­ent Mike McK­enna, said Nor­ris told him the story about his ex­change with Re­id’s chief of staff six months ago. “Re­id call­ing Nor­ris a li­ar — and that is what he did — is com­pletely out­rageous,” McK­enna said. “Giv­en that he [Nor­ris] has a lot more to lose by speak­ing out than Harry Re­id, there is no doubt in my mind that John is telling the truth.”

Re­id has a track re­cord of sup­port­ing clean en­ergy over fossil fuels, said his former spokes­man Jim Man­ley.

“Sen­at­or Re­id is very strong sup­port­er of re­new­ables, and a staunch op­pon­ent of coal, be­liev­ing there is no such thing as clean coal,” Man­ley said. “And so as part of that, he’ll do what he can to pro­tect in­di­vidu­al nom­in­ees.”

Nevada has a lot at stake with FERC, es­pe­cially its hand­ling of re­new­able-en­ergy trans­mis­sion, which is an is­sue Welling­hoff has pri­or­it­ized as chair­man. Nevada ranked second in the na­tion in net elec­tri­city gen­er­a­tion from geo­therm­al and sol­ar en­ergy, and 90 per­cent of its en­ergy comes from out of the state, ac­cord­ing to the En­ergy In­form­a­tion Ad­min­is­tra­tion.

Orth­man, Re­id’s cur­rent spokes­wo­man, didn’t com­ment on Re­id’s po­ten­tial be­hind-the-scenes in­volve­ment in the con­firm­a­tion pro­cess, but simply re­stated Re­id’s sup­port for Binz.

“Sen­at­or Re­id sup­ports the pres­id­ent’s nom­in­ee, who has strong bi­par­tis­an sup­port from people who know FERC bet­ter than any­one,” Orth­man said, re­fer­ring to a let­ter that former FERC com­mis­sion­ers wrote in sup­port of Binz.

Adding to the scru­tiny sur­round­ing Re­id’s in­volve­ment is the fact that two former aides to the Sen­ate ma­jor­ity lead­er are work­ing with VennSquared Com­mu­nic­a­tions on Binz’s nom­in­a­tion. Last week, The Wash­ing­ton Times re­por­ted on e-mails that re­vealed Chris Miller, who left the lead­er’s of­fice earli­er this year as his top en­ergy and en­vir­on­ment aide, and former deputy staff dir­ect­or Kai An­der­son have been help­ing prep Binz for the Sen­ate con­firm­a­tion pro­cess along with Mi­chael Mee­han, pres­id­ent and CEO of VennSquared.

In an in­ter­view, Mee­han denied any co­ordin­a­tion with Re­id’s of­fice. An­der­son and Miller op­ted not to com­ment for this story.

“I haven’t talked to Sen­at­or Re­id or any­one in his of­fice on this top­ic,” Mee­han said. “I’m not aware that Re­id called up Chris and Kai to help with this nom­in­a­tion, and cer­tainly not me.”

Re­id’s role in pro­mot­ing Binz for the FERC post may nev­er be­come clear, but it is not sur­pris­ing to some who know Re­id best. “He’s an aw­fully Ma­chiavel­lian char­ac­ter some­times,” Man­ley said.

What We're Following See More »
AVOIDS SHUTDOWN WITH A FEW HOURS TO SPARE
Trump Signs Border Deal
1 weeks ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Source:
REDIRECTS $8 BILLION
Trump Declares National Emergency
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

Source:
COULD SOW DIVISION AMONG REPUBLICANS
House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."

Source:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, DRUG FORFEITURE FUND
Where Will the Emergency Money Come From?
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"ABC News has learned the president plans to announce on Friday his intention to spend about $8 billion on the border wall with a mix of spending from Congressional appropriations approved Thursday night, executive action and an emergency declaration. A senior White House official familiar with the plan told ABC News that $1.375 billion would come from the spending bill Congress passed Thursday; $600 million would come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture fund; $2.5 billion would come from the Pentagon's drug interdiction program; and through an emergency declaration: $3.5 billion from the Pentagon's military construction budget."

Source:
TRUMP SAYS HE WILL SIGN
House Passes Funding Deal
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed a massive border and budget bill that would avert a shutdown and keep the government funded through the end of September. The Senate passed the measure earlier Thursday. The bill provides $1.375 billion for fences, far short of the $5.7 billion President Trump had demanded to fund steel walls. But the president says he will sign the legislation, and instead seek to fund his border wall by declaring a national emergency."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login