Navy Yard Shows Fallacy of NRA’s ‘More Guns’ Solution

After Newtown, the gun lobby powerhouse said the solution was armed guards. So what about Navy Yard?

Members of the military guard a military garage near the Navy Yard. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
National Journal
Matthew Cooper
See more stories about...
Matthew Cooper
Sept. 17, 2013, 5:34 a.m.

After the shoot­ing in New­town that left 20 ele­ment­ary school stu­dents dead, the Na­tion­al Rifle As­so­ci­ation re­spon­ded with a pro­pos­al for what it called Na­tion­al School Shield pro­gram. The idea, said the or­gan­iz­a­tion’s lead­er, Wayne LaPierre, was that “the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.” The shield pro­gram aimed to put an armed guard in every ele­ment­ary school in the coun­try to pro­tect chil­dren from the next de­ranged killer.

The Navy Yard shoot­ing ex­poses a fal­lacy in that ar­gu­ment. A mil­it­ary fa­cil­ity, the Navy Yard had plenty of good guys with weapons who were non­ethe­less were un­able to stop Aaron Alex­is, the al­leged shoot­er, from killing a dozen in­no­cent per­sons. In the com­ing weeks, we’ll learn more about Navy Yard se­cur­ity and how Alex­is was able to thwart it. (We’ll also learn more about how he ob­tained his arms, but let’s leave that aside for now.)

True, the Navy Yard is not a heav­ily armed fa­cil­ity. It’s not like, say, walk­ing in­to a mil­it­ary base in the U.S. let alone onto a war zone. But neither was it the kind of gun-free school zone that the NRA has de­scribed as an in­vit­ing tar­get for crazed shoot­ers. It was at least as heav­ily armed as we can ex­pect any ele­ment­ary school could ever be un­der the Na­tion­al School Shield pro­gram. And yet, carnage.

The NRA is in some sense right that guns stop mass shoot­ers ““ al­though in At­lanta this year, a de­ranged man with weapons was talked in­to sur­render by a savvy, quick-think­ing ad­min­is­trat­or. Still, guns stopped Alex­is, not pleas. In that sense, La Pierre is right.

But it’s also true that shoot­ers seem em­in­ently cap­able of wreak­ing carnage be­fore they can be stopped by on-site, armed per­son­nel. This was true in the shoot­ing at the U.S. Army’s Fort Hood base and at Columbine High School, which had an armed guard. By the NRA’s own lo­gic, un­less vir­tu­ally every teach­er in a school, or per­son in an of­fice, is pack­ing heat and is trained to use their weapon, a de­term­ined shoot­er can sow hav­oc be­fore their weapons are si­lenced

After New­town, La Pierre looked to re­tired po­lice of­ficers, among oth­ers, to be en­lis­ted so that there would be a guard in every ele­ment­ary school.

There may be a good ar­gu­ment for hav­ing armed guards in schools and many have chosen to provide such pro­tec­tion, but the idea that guards alone will pre­vent mass shoot­ings isn’t one of them. If the United States Navy couldn’t take out a mass shoot­er be­fore he—and it’s al­ways a he—does his de­ranged work, can a guard?

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
6 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×