Following Syria’s promise to give up its chemical weapons, Egypt and Russia on Monday pledged to work harder to garner Middle Eastern support for a conference on establishing a region-wide ban against unconventional weapons, ITAR-Tass reported.
“We agreed [to] practical steps to invigorate the preparation of this important event, especially against the background of the Syrian leadership’s decision to join the Chemical Weapons Convention,” Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said after meeting with his Egyptian counterpart, Nabil Fahmy.
Syria’s willingness to go along with WMD-free zone talks is expected to have repercussions on other regional states thought to possess unconventional weapons. Syria has a sizable chemical-weapons arsenal and a suspected biological weapons program.
International efforts in late 2012 to convene a U.N.-backed conference on negotiating a weapons-of-mass-destruction-free zone for the whole Middle East fell apart after Israel would not confirm its participation in the event. As Israel is widely seen as holding the region’s sole nuclear arsenal, the Jewish state’s involvement in the conference is seen is as essential for it to be a success.
Washington supports Israel’s position that a regional prohibition on weapons of mass destruction is not realistic if there is no all-encompassing Arab-Israeli peace deal and if Iran maintains its enrichment of uranium and other nuclear-weapon-related activities.
International attention on Syria’s chemical arsenal also has meant that some of the spotlight also is on Israel’s own suspected chemical-weapon capabilities. Israel has signed but not ratified the CWC accord, the Associated Press reported.
Onetime Israeli Defense Minister Amir Peretz in a Monday radio interview would not discuss questions about his nation’s suspected chemical arsenal. “It’s clear to everyone that [Israel] is a democratic, responsible regime,” he said. “I very much hope and am certain that the international community will not make this a central question and we will maintain the status quo.”
Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Paul Hirschson said his government could not ratify the CWC pact in the present security circumstances.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."