The Boom and Bust of National Interest in Gun Laws, According to Google

National Journal
Marina Koren
See more stories about...
Marina Koren
Sept. 17, 2013, 11:11 a.m.

Po­lice tape was still blow­ing in the breeze Tues­day in Wash­ing­ton’s Navy Yard when con­ver­sa­tion turned from the shoot­ing that claimed 12 in­no­cent lives to gun con­trol. The shift was not un­ex­pec­ted — de­bate over gun laws in the United States nat­ur­ally spikes im­me­di­ately after mass shoot­ings. But, as his­tory has shown, the con­ver­sa­tion will in­ev­it­ably die out with­in a few months.

The story of the boom-and-bust of na­tion­al in­terest in the gun de­bate can be doc­u­mented us­ing Google Trends. In the past six years, the pop­ular­ity of the search term “gun laws” in the U.S. re­mained steady, save for in the im­me­di­ate af­ter­math of mass shoot­ings.

The lone spike early on, in 2007, co­in­cided with that April’s shoot­ing at Vir­gin­ia Tech, in which 32 people were killed. The slight up­tick in Novem­ber 2009 co­in­cided with the Fort Hood shoot­ing, in which an Army ma­jor fatally shot 13 people and wounded more than 30 oth­ers on a mil­it­ary base in Texas. The spike in Janu­ary 2011 fol­lows the shoot­ing in Tuc­son that killed six people and severely in­jured Rep. Gab­ri­elle Gif­fords, D-Ar­iz., who was shot in the head at point-blank range.

A later jump in searches, this one lar­ger than earli­er ones, co­in­cided with the shoot­ing in an Au­rora, Colo., movie theat­er that claimed the lives of 12 people and in­jured 70 oth­ers. The biggest spike on the chart, start­ing on Decem­ber 2012 and last­ing well in­to the New Year, was a res­ult of the Sandy Hook Ele­ment­ary School shoot­ing in New­ton, Conn., in which 20 chil­dren and six teach­ers died.

Search volume for the term “gun laws” dur­ing this time was its re­l­at­ive highest in Alaska, Ari­zona, and Wyom­ing, states with some of the coun­try’s most le­ni­ent gun laws.

The search term “gun con­trol” fol­lows a sim­il­ar tra­ject­ory, but saw a big­ger spike this spring when sev­er­al pieces of gun-con­trol le­gis­la­tion reached the Sen­ate floor, and then failed. In­terest peaked again in Wyom­ing, as well as in Idaho and West Vir­gin­ia, states with sim­il­arly lax gun le­gis­la­tion.

The most re­veal­ing chart, however, may be this one, which shows the birth and growth of what the term “gun de­bate” means today in the United States. In 2004, people googled “gun de­bate” to learn more about an ac­tu­al de­bate: a pres­id­en­tial de­bate between George W. Bush and John Kerry on do­mest­ic policy, in which the pair sparred over gun le­gis­la­tion. Today, people who Google “gun de­bate” are search­ing for something com­pletely dif­fer­ent: What a string of dev­ast­at­ing mass shoot­ings means for the na­tion’s gun laws.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
10 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×