An international chemical-arms-control organization on Monday said it was drafting plans for its personnel to conduct in-person checks of Syria’s chemical-warfare assets amid the nation’s raging civil war.
Syrian President Bashar Assad’s government is required to fully declare by Friday its chemical-weapons holdings, as dictated by a U.S.-Russia agreement for international monitoring and elimination of the Syrian arsenal. That plan, negotiated last week, demands “a comprehensive listing, including names, types, and quantities of its chemical weapons agents, types of munitions, and location and form of storage, production, and research and development facilities.”
“Our experts will verify the accuracy of this disclosure with on-site inspections, and will also assist in putting into place arrangements to keep the warfare materials and the relevant facilities secure until their destruction,” the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons said in a statement. The group said that the Chemical Weapons Convention — the treaty it is charged with enforcing — would take effect on Oct. 14 for the government in Damascus.
The 41-nation OPCW Executive Council “is expected to meet soon” to confer on a fleshed-out plan for verifying the declared stocks, the press release says. The materials might be dispersed across up to 80 locations across Syria, the Wall Street Journal reported last week.
The White House on Monday authorized deliveries of chemical-weapon protective gear to OPCW personnel, as well as supplies of related treatments and defenses to Syrian medical personnel and “vetted” opposition forces.
British Foreign Secretary William Hague said he wants the OPCW body to decide on a plan before “the end of the week,” the London Telegraph reported on Tuesday.
“We’ll then be working on agreeing a Security Council resolution over the weekend” to back up the OPCW blueprint, Hague said. “Of course, those timetables might slip but we’re looking at days, not weeks.”
Russia’s top diplomat on Tuesday suggested his country might later consider allowing the U.N. Security Council to endorse a military response to potential missteps by Assad’s government, the Associated Press reported. However, Moscow has opposed including a threat of armed force in the initial measure planned by the 15-country body.
Meanwhile, a U.N. task force will return to Syria “as soon as possible” to complete a final report on claims of chemical-weapon use in the country, U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon told reporters on Monday. The team’s initial findings — made public the same day — describe strong evidence that a sarin nerve agent strike took place on Aug. 21 in the suburbs of Damascus.
Asked if he had used the report to assign blame for the strike, the U.N. chief said “it is for others to decide whether to … determine responsibility.”
France, the United States and multiple independent analysts described the U.N. findings as strong indicators that Assad’s regime had orchestrated the Aug. 21 attack, Foreign Policy magazine reported on Monday. Washington has assessed the incident to have killed more than 1,400 people, and has cited it as the basis for possible military strikes against Syrian government targets.
Russia’s envoy to the United Nations, though, said Western powers had “jumped to their conclusions” about the U.N. findings.
Moscow has insisted that resistance fighters have been responsible for chemical strikes in Syria, but Hague mocked that stance. “Even the Russians are not discussing the declaration and destruction of opposition-held chemical weapons because even they don’t think they really exist,” the Telegraph quoted him as saying.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.