OPCW Drafts Plan to Check Syrian Chemical-Warfare Stocks

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Sept. 17, 2013, 9:02 a.m.

An in­ter­na­tion­al chem­ic­al-arms-con­trol or­gan­iz­a­tion on Monday said it was draft­ing plans for its per­son­nel to con­duct in-per­son checks of Syr­ia’s chem­ic­al-war­fare as­sets amid the na­tion’s ra­ging civil war.

Syr­i­an Pres­id­ent Bashar As­sad’s gov­ern­ment is re­quired to fully de­clare by Fri­day its chem­ic­al-weapons hold­ings, as dic­tated by a U.S.-Rus­sia agree­ment for in­ter­na­tion­al mon­it­or­ing and elim­in­a­tion of the Syr­i­an ar­sen­al. That plan, ne­go­ti­ated last week, de­mands “a com­pre­hens­ive list­ing, in­clud­ing names, types, and quant­it­ies of its chem­ic­al weapons agents, types of mu­ni­tions, and loc­a­tion and form of stor­age, pro­duc­tion, and re­search and de­vel­op­ment fa­cil­it­ies.”

“Our ex­perts will veri­fy the ac­cur­acy of this dis­clos­ure with on-site in­spec­tions, and will also as­sist in put­ting in­to place ar­range­ments to keep the war­fare ma­ter­i­als and the rel­ev­ant fa­cil­it­ies se­cure un­til their de­struc­tion,” the Or­gan­iz­a­tion for the Pro­hib­i­tion of Chem­ic­al Weapons said in a state­ment. The group said that the Chem­ic­al Weapons Con­ven­tion — the treaty it is charged with en­for­cing — would take ef­fect on Oct. 14 for the gov­ern­ment in Dam­as­cus.

The 41-na­tion OP­CW Ex­ec­ut­ive Coun­cil “is ex­pec­ted to meet soon” to con­fer on a fleshed-out plan for veri­fy­ing the de­clared stocks, the press re­lease says. The ma­ter­i­als might be dis­persed across up to 80 loc­a­tions across Syr­ia, the Wall Street Journ­al re­por­ted last week.

The White House on Monday au­thor­ized de­liv­er­ies of chem­ic­al-weapon pro­tect­ive gear to OP­CW per­son­nel, as well as sup­plies of re­lated treat­ments and de­fenses to Syr­i­an med­ic­al per­son­nel and “vet­ted” op­pos­i­tion forces.

Brit­ish For­eign Sec­ret­ary Wil­li­am Hag­ue said he wants the OP­CW body to de­cide on a plan be­fore “the end of the week,” the Lon­don Tele­graph re­por­ted on Tues­day.

“We’ll then be work­ing on agree­ing a Se­cur­ity Coun­cil res­ol­u­tion over the week­end” to back up the OP­CW blue­print, Hag­ue said. “Of course, those timetables might slip but we’re look­ing at days, not weeks.”

Rus­sia’s top dip­lo­mat on Tues­day sug­ges­ted his coun­try might later con­sider al­low­ing the U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil to en­dorse a mil­it­ary re­sponse to po­ten­tial mis­steps by As­sad’s gov­ern­ment, the As­so­ci­ated Press re­por­ted. However, Mo­scow has op­posed in­clud­ing a threat of armed force in the ini­tial meas­ure planned by the 15-coun­try body.

Mean­while, a U.N. task force will re­turn to Syr­ia “as soon as pos­sible” to com­plete a fi­nal re­port on claims of chem­ic­al-weapon use in the coun­try, U.N. Sec­ret­ary Gen­er­al Ban Ki-moon told re­port­ers on Monday. The team’s ini­tial find­ings — made pub­lic the same day — de­scribe strong evid­ence that a sar­in nerve agent strike took place on Aug. 21 in the sub­urbs of Dam­as­cus.

Asked if he had used the re­port to as­sign blame for the strike, the U.N. chief said “it is for oth­ers to de­cide wheth­er to … de­term­ine re­spons­ib­il­ity.”

France, the United States and mul­tiple in­de­pend­ent ana­lysts de­scribed the U.N. find­ings as strong in­dic­at­ors that As­sad’s re­gime had or­ches­trated the Aug. 21 at­tack, For­eign Policy magazine re­por­ted on Monday. Wash­ing­ton has as­sessed the in­cid­ent to have killed more than 1,400 people, and has cited it as the basis for pos­sible mil­it­ary strikes against Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment tar­gets.

Rus­sia’s en­voy to the United Na­tions, though, said West­ern powers had “jumped to their con­clu­sions” about the U.N. find­ings.

Mo­scow has in­sisted that res­ist­ance fight­ers have been re­spons­ible for chem­ic­al strikes in Syr­ia, but Hag­ue mocked that stance. “Even the Rus­si­ans are not dis­cuss­ing the de­clar­a­tion and de­struc­tion of op­pos­i­tion-held chem­ic­al weapons be­cause even they don’t think they really ex­ist,” the Tele­graph quoted him as say­ing.

What We're Following See More »
TRUMP’S ATTORNEY WAS SET TO TESTIFY ON WEDNESDAY
Senate Intel Postpones Testimony by Cohen
1 days ago
THE LATEST
AMENDMENT WOULD HAVE PREVENTED CONSIDERATION
Senate Rejects Effort to Nix SALT Tax Changes
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Senate Democrats on Thursday failed in their first attempt to save the state and local tax deduction, which helps many residents of California and other high-cost states reduce their federal income tax bills. The Republican-controlled Senate voted 52-47 to reject an amendment that would have prevented the Senate from considering any bill that repeals or limits the deduction as part of a planned tax overhaul."

Source:
INTERVIEWED BY COMMITTEE STAFF
Lewandowski Meets with Senate Intelligence Committee
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"President Donald Trump's former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski appeared on Capitol Hill for a closed-door interview with the Senate intelligence committee Wednesday, according to a source familiar with the matter. Lewandowski is the latest senior official in Trump's orbit who has met with the committee as part of its investigation into Russian election meddling and possible collusion with the Trump campaign."

Source:
FISHING EXPEDITION
Some Members Seek to Wrap Up Russia Investigations by Year’s End
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"A growing number of key Republicans are sending this message to the leaders of the congressional committees investigating potential Trump campaign collusion with the Russians: Wrap it up soon. In the House and Senate, several Republicans who sit on key committees are starting to grumble that the investigations have spanned the better part of the past nine months, contending that the Democratic push to extend the investigation well into next year could amount to a fishing expedition."

Source:
WROTE LAW THAT WEAKENED OPIOID OVERSIGHT
Trump: Marino Withdrawing Nomination for Drug Czar
4 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login