OPCW Drafts Plan to Check Syrian Chemical-Warfare Stocks

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Sept. 17, 2013, 9:02 a.m.

An in­ter­na­tion­al chem­ic­al-arms-con­trol or­gan­iz­a­tion on Monday said it was draft­ing plans for its per­son­nel to con­duct in-per­son checks of Syr­ia’s chem­ic­al-war­fare as­sets amid the na­tion’s ra­ging civil war.

Syr­i­an Pres­id­ent Bashar As­sad’s gov­ern­ment is re­quired to fully de­clare by Fri­day its chem­ic­al-weapons hold­ings, as dic­tated by a U.S.-Rus­sia agree­ment for in­ter­na­tion­al mon­it­or­ing and elim­in­a­tion of the Syr­i­an ar­sen­al. That plan, ne­go­ti­ated last week, de­mands “a com­pre­hens­ive list­ing, in­clud­ing names, types, and quant­it­ies of its chem­ic­al weapons agents, types of mu­ni­tions, and loc­a­tion and form of stor­age, pro­duc­tion, and re­search and de­vel­op­ment fa­cil­it­ies.”

“Our ex­perts will veri­fy the ac­cur­acy of this dis­clos­ure with on-site in­spec­tions, and will also as­sist in put­ting in­to place ar­range­ments to keep the war­fare ma­ter­i­als and the rel­ev­ant fa­cil­it­ies se­cure un­til their de­struc­tion,” the Or­gan­iz­a­tion for the Pro­hib­i­tion of Chem­ic­al Weapons said in a state­ment. The group said that the Chem­ic­al Weapons Con­ven­tion — the treaty it is charged with en­for­cing — would take ef­fect on Oct. 14 for the gov­ern­ment in Dam­as­cus.

The 41-na­tion OP­CW Ex­ec­ut­ive Coun­cil “is ex­pec­ted to meet soon” to con­fer on a fleshed-out plan for veri­fy­ing the de­clared stocks, the press re­lease says. The ma­ter­i­als might be dis­persed across up to 80 loc­a­tions across Syr­ia, the Wall Street Journ­al re­por­ted last week.

The White House on Monday au­thor­ized de­liv­er­ies of chem­ic­al-weapon pro­tect­ive gear to OP­CW per­son­nel, as well as sup­plies of re­lated treat­ments and de­fenses to Syr­i­an med­ic­al per­son­nel and “vet­ted” op­pos­i­tion forces.

Brit­ish For­eign Sec­ret­ary Wil­li­am Hag­ue said he wants the OP­CW body to de­cide on a plan be­fore “the end of the week,” the Lon­don Tele­graph re­por­ted on Tues­day.

“We’ll then be work­ing on agree­ing a Se­cur­ity Coun­cil res­ol­u­tion over the week­end” to back up the OP­CW blue­print, Hag­ue said. “Of course, those timetables might slip but we’re look­ing at days, not weeks.”

Rus­sia’s top dip­lo­mat on Tues­day sug­ges­ted his coun­try might later con­sider al­low­ing the U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil to en­dorse a mil­it­ary re­sponse to po­ten­tial mis­steps by As­sad’s gov­ern­ment, the As­so­ci­ated Press re­por­ted. However, Mo­scow has op­posed in­clud­ing a threat of armed force in the ini­tial meas­ure planned by the 15-coun­try body.

Mean­while, a U.N. task force will re­turn to Syr­ia “as soon as pos­sible” to com­plete a fi­nal re­port on claims of chem­ic­al-weapon use in the coun­try, U.N. Sec­ret­ary Gen­er­al Ban Ki-moon told re­port­ers on Monday. The team’s ini­tial find­ings — made pub­lic the same day — de­scribe strong evid­ence that a sar­in nerve agent strike took place on Aug. 21 in the sub­urbs of Dam­as­cus.

Asked if he had used the re­port to as­sign blame for the strike, the U.N. chief said “it is for oth­ers to de­cide wheth­er to … de­term­ine re­spons­ib­il­ity.”

France, the United States and mul­tiple in­de­pend­ent ana­lysts de­scribed the U.N. find­ings as strong in­dic­at­ors that As­sad’s re­gime had or­ches­trated the Aug. 21 at­tack, For­eign Policy magazine re­por­ted on Monday. Wash­ing­ton has as­sessed the in­cid­ent to have killed more than 1,400 people, and has cited it as the basis for pos­sible mil­it­ary strikes against Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment tar­gets.

Rus­sia’s en­voy to the United Na­tions, though, said West­ern powers had “jumped to their con­clu­sions” about the U.N. find­ings.

Mo­scow has in­sisted that res­ist­ance fight­ers have been re­spons­ible for chem­ic­al strikes in Syr­ia, but Hag­ue mocked that stance. “Even the Rus­si­ans are not dis­cuss­ing the de­clar­a­tion and de­struc­tion of op­pos­i­tion-held chem­ic­al weapons be­cause even they don’t think they really ex­ist,” the Tele­graph quoted him as say­ing.

What We're Following See More »
BUT IS HE A YES VOTE?
Cornyn Attempting to Get McCain Back for Health Vote
7 minutes ago
THE LATEST
“TIME HAD RUN OUT” FOR ILL BABY
Charlie Gard’s Parents End Legal Fight
31 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"A lawyer representing Chris Gard and Connie Yates told the High Court 'time had run out' for the baby. Mr. Gard said it meant his 'sweet, gorgeous, innocent little boy' will not reach his first birthday on 4 August. 'To let our beautiful little Charlie go' is 'the hardest thing we'll ever have to do,' his mother said. Charlie's parents said they made the decision because a US doctor had told them it was now too late to give Charlie nucleoside therapy.

Source:
AGENCY SOUGHT TO DELAY IMPLEMENTATION
11 States Sue EPA Over Chemical Rule
33 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"Eleven states have sued the Environmental Protection Agency over its June decision to delay implementation of a chemical safety rule" until 2019. "The state attorneys general, led by New York’s Eric Schneiderman (D), argue the rule is important for 'protecting our workers, first-responders and communities from chemical accidents' and should be allowed to take affect as planned by the Obama administration’s EPA.

Source:
ULTIMATUM ON ACA
Trump: You’re With Us Or Against Us
51 minutes ago
THE LATEST
$1.6 BILLION SET ASIDE FOR WALL
House Freedom Caucus Chair: Shutdown Over Wall Funding Unlikely
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) on Monday said that funding for President Trump's controversial border wall is unlikely to cause a government shutdown. 'The odds of a government shutdown are very minimal when it comes to that,' the conservative lawmaker said at an event in Washington, D.C. 'I do think the funding of the border wall will happen,' he added. Appropriators have set aside $1.6 billion to fund new wall and fencing sections on parts of the U.S.-Mexico border covering a few dozen miles."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login