Coal-country Democrats aren’t eager to talk about the Environmental Protection Agency’s new emission regulations for power plants expected to be released later this week, which could put them in a tough position between the pressures of regional politics and party loyalty.
The new limits are expected to effectively require carbon capture — a still-developing technology — for all new coal-fired plants in order to meet emission standards. That has drawn backlash from many in the coal industry, but most Democrats from coal-heavy regions have largely been hesitant to speak out.
The regulations are a cornerstone of President Obama’s action plan for addressing climate change, with coal-burning power plants known as one of the largest sources of greenhouse gases in the country. But the coal industry, producers of a relatively cheap and abundant energy source, would be hit hard by the EPA rules, as higher operating costs for power plants lead utilities to switch to lower-cost and lower-emitting natural gas.
Only one of the seven Democratic members of the Congressional Coal Caucus would comment on the regulations; several said they were withholding their reactions until the policy is official. Other coal-country candidates — including Rep. Allyson Schwartz, D-Pa., a candidate for governor in her state, and West Virginia Secretary of State Natalie Tennant, a Senate hopeful — also did not offer comment on the new standards. Tennant has said she disagrees with some of Obama’s coal policies.
Coal industry leaders say they expect some politicians to break their silence soon. “It has not had the level of discussion it should be having in Congress,” said Nancy Gravatt, senior vice president of communications for the National Mining Association. “I expect there will be more [Democrats opposing it].” Ohio Coal Association President Zane Daniels added, “I think it’s important that we see bipartisan opposition to the proposed regulations.”
Not every Democrat has been silent on the issue, however. Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., voiced his opposition at a Tuesday Senate hearing. “We’re getting the living crap beat out of us by this administration,” he said. “They just beat the living daylights out of little West Virginia, but they sure like what we produce.”
Another West Virginia Democrat, Rep. Nick Rahall, was equally vehement in his stance. “I am dead-set against the EPA and their scheme to issue emissions standards that would make it impossible for new coal-fired power plants to be constructed,” he said in a statement.
Their positions were welcome news for Bill Raney, president of the West Virginia Coal Association. “This doesn’t have a thing to do with partisan politics,” he said. “It shouldn’t make a difference to any of them, whether they’re Democrat or Republican; it’s simply wrong.”
Kentucky Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes, who is challenging Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., issued her own pushback on the new standards. “Coal keeps the lights on in Kentucky — plain and simple — and I will not stand idle as overreaching regulation adversely impacts jobs and middle-class families,” she said.
Sens. Joe Donnelly, D-Ind., and Robert Casey, D-Pa., would not offer comment on the regulations until they are made official, but Donnelly urged a focus on existing technology and Casey praised coal’s role as a cheap energy source.
Such breaks with Obama’s policy are often necessary for Democrats from coal-heavy areas, said one Pennsylvania Democratic operative who requested anonymity to protect a current candidate. “People have a general perception of the parties,” he said. “[Democrats] almost have to be more vocal than the Republicans sometimes because you don’t want to be painted with that broad brush. It also kind of symbolizes who you’re for. It’s not just an energy issue; it’s a cultural issue. Being against coal can mean to voters that you’re against the working class, you’re an elitist.”
What We're Following See More »
Since the release of the Access Hollywood tape, on which Donald Trump boasted of sexually assaulting women, "Senate Republicans have seen their fortunes dip, particularly in states like Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada and Pennsylvania," where Hillary Clinton now leads. Jennifer Duffy writes that she now expects Democrats to gain five to seven seats—enough to regain control of the chamber.
"Of the Senate seats in the Toss Up column, Trump only leads in Indiana and Missouri where both Republicans are running a few points behind him. ... History shows that races in the Toss Up column never split down the middle; one party tends to win the lion’s share of them."
"Some Republicans are running so far away from their party’s nominee that they are threatening to sue TV stations for running ads that suggest they support Donald Trump. Just two weeks before Election Day, five Republicans―Reps. Bob Dold (R-Ill.), Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), David Jolly (R-Fla.), John Katko (R-N.Y.) and Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican running for an open seat that’s currently occupied by his brother―contend that certain commercials paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee provide false or misleading information by connecting them to the GOP nominee. Trump is so terrible, these Republicans are essentially arguing, that tying them to him amounts to defamation."
Former Illinois GOP Congressman Aaron Schock "recently agreed to pay a $10,000 fine for making an excessive solicitation for a super PAC that was active in his home state of Illinois four years ago." Schock resigned from Congress after a story about his Downton Abbey-themed congressional office raised questions about how he was using taxpayer dollars.
If you need a marker for how confident Hillary Clinton is at this point of the race, here's one: CNN's Jeff Zeleny reports "she's been talking to Republican senators, old allies and new, saying that she is willing to work with them and govern."