Why Gun Control Can’t Eliminate Gun Violence

Advocates push measures that might reduce everyday crime, but absent a ban on ownership, no recent tragedy would have been averted by regulation.

**ADVANCE FOR WEEEKEND, APRIL 12-13** A row of weapons is seen at the Richmond Gun Show at the Richmond International Raceway on Sunday, March 30, 2008.
National Journal
Fawn Johnson
See more stories about...
Fawn Johnson
Sept. 18, 2013, 1:32 a.m.

Noth­ing that gun-con­trol ad­voc­ates are push­ing for in Con­gress would have pre­ven­ted Monday’s shoot­ing ram­page at the Wash­ing­ton Navy Yard. And un­less this coun­try bans all per­son­al own­er­ship of guns, an­oth­er mass shoot­ing will oc­cur.

This is the greatest hurdle for the gun-con­trol move­ment. They seek changes to the law that a ma­jor­ity of the pub­lic sup­ports — ex­pan­ded back­ground checks, an as­sault weapons ban, and lim­its on high-ca­pa­city am­muni­tion. But they are up against for­mid­able op­pon­ents in the gun-rights groups. And the only time they get to talk about it is after a splashy, tra­gic in­cid­ent that does not rep­res­ent the bulk of gun deaths — sui­cides, street crimes, ac­ci­dents.

“You have to base the push around more than the out­rage on any one tragedy. It has to be based on our col­lect­ive de­sire to make this be the coun­try we all want it to be,” said Dan Gross, pres­id­ent of the Brady Cam­paign to Pre­vent Gun Vi­ol­ence. “In or­der to cre­ate the most mean­ing­ful change, we have to look at the gun vi­ol­ence that hap­pens every day.”

Pre­vent­ing every­day gun vi­ol­ence is hard, and it’s not go­ing to hap­pen overnight. Curb­ing gun vi­ol­ence from crim­in­als would re­quire ser­i­ous at­tempts to un­der­stand how guns get in­to their hands in the first place. Crim­in­als have only a few ways to get a gun, as­sum­ing they can’t pass a back­ground check — buy­ing it at a gun show or on­line, buy­ing it on the black mar­ket, or steal­ing it.

Stop­ping that is like a game of Whack-a-Mole. For each way that a crim­in­al gets a gun, you need a dif­fer­ent rule to stop it. Back­ground checks at gun shows are an ob­vi­ous way to get rid of one of a crim­in­al’s op­tions for get­ting a gun. But that doesn’t stop him or her from buy­ing a gun privately from straw pur­chasers. There are oth­er ways to pre­vent that kind of gun traf­fick­ing, but those laws in­ev­it­ably will have loop­holes or no one would be able to buy a gun at all.

Stop­ping gun traf­fick­ing is even harder if it has to hap­pen state by state. A now-ex­pired Vir­gin­ia law that only al­lowed people to buy one gun per month dra­mat­ic­ally re­duced the num­ber of Vir­gin­ia-pur­chased guns re­covered at crime scenes. That’s be­cause “crime guns” are of­ten pur­chased il­leg­ally by someone who buys them in bulk from a le­git­im­ate deal­er. But even when Vir­gin­ia’s law was in place (it ex­pired in 2012), the num­ber of “crime guns” from oth­er states in­creased.

And then there are the mass shoot­ings, which are even harder to pre­vent. “A de­ranged crazy per­son, largely in sui­cid­al range, de­cides to take out as many people as pos­sible — that’s the most dif­fi­cult of all,” said Richard Feld­man, pres­id­ent of the In­de­pend­ent Fire­arm Own­ers As­so­ci­ation.

To wit, the Navy Yard shoot­er Aaron Alex­is had a his­tory of vi­ol­ence, some brushes with the law, and a his­tory of neg­li­gence with a gun. But the cur­rent back­ground check laws couldn’t stop him from buy­ing a gun be­cause he wasn’t de­creed by a court to be men­tally in­com­pet­ent and he wasn’t a con­victed felon. He even had a se­cur­ity clear­ance that gave him ac­cess to a mil­it­ary com­pound, cour­tesy of an em­ploy­er that didn’t know about his stan­doffs with the loc­al po­lice or his prob­lems in the Navy Re­serve.

Back­ground checks have to ac­tu­ally de­tect prob­lems or they’re not go­ing to work. “This was a guy with a his­tory of vi­ol­ent be­ha­vi­or and reck­less­ness with fire­arms,” said Ladd Everitt, com­mu­nic­a­tions dir­ect­or for the Co­ali­tion to Stop Gun Vi­ol­ence. “There is no oth­er civ­il­ized so­ci­ety that would al­low him leg­ally to own a gun and carry it in pub­lic. “¦We have a reg­u­lat­ory sys­tem in this coun­try that is riddled with loop­holes and a joke.”

Some call them loop­holes. Some call them le­git­im­ate pro­tec­tions of gun own­ers’ rights. Either way, the pro­cess of cre­at­ing and us­ing any rules to curb gun vi­ol­ence will take gun rights in­to ac­count. That means com­prom­ise, and that means ex­cep­tions to the rules that could al­low an­oth­er vi­ol­ent in­cid­ent to oc­cur. It’s in­ev­it­able.

Does that mean the gun-con­trol ad­voc­ates should give up? They cer­tainly show no signs of it, al­though Gross thinks they should start talk­ing about the is­sue more hol­ist­ic­ally. “We need to be hav­ing a con­ver­sa­tion about guns like we have a con­ver­sa­tion about everything else in so­ci­ety that presents risks and re­wards — auto­mo­biles, swim­ming pools,” he said.

And even though the gun con­trol ad­voc­ates couldn’t muster the sup­port to pass a Sen­ate bill that ex­pan­ded back­ground checks in April, that only ad­ded fuel to their fire.

“Sarah Brady, after the Sen­ate vote, turned to me and see­ing how up­set I was — this was my first big policy fight — she said, ‘Some­times it takes a good de­feat,’” Gross said.

Sarah Brady ought to know. As the wife of Re­agan White House spokes­man Jim Brady, who was shot in an as­sas­sin­a­tion at­tempt 1981, she spent more than a dec­ade try­ing to get the first hand­gun back­ground check bill to pass. It took six votes in Con­gress over sev­en years.

What We're Following See More »
Sanders Upsets Clinton in Indiana
33 minutes ago

Despite trailing Hillary Clinton by a significant margin, Bernie Sanders wasn't going the way of Ted Cruz tonight. The Vermont senator upset Clinton in Indiana, with MSNBC calling the race at 9pm. Sanders appears poised to win by a five- or six-point spread.

Ted Cruz Bows Out, Effectively Ceding the Contest to Trump
1 hours ago

And just like that, it's over. Ted Cruz will suspend his presidential campaign after losing badly to Donald Trump in Indiana tonight. "While Cruz had always hedged when asked whether he would quit if he lost Indiana; his campaign had laid a huge bet on the state." John Kasich's campaign has pledged to carry on. “From the beginning, I’ve said that I would continue on as long as there was a viable path to victory,” said Cruz. “Tonight, I’m sorry to say it appears that path has been foreclosed."

Trump Wins Indiana, All but Seals the Nomination
1 hours ago

The Republican establishment's last remaining hope—a contested convention this summer—may have just ended in Indiana, as Donald Trump won a decisive victory over Ted Cruz. Nothing Cruz seemed to have in his corner seemed to help—not a presumptive VP pick in Carly Fiorina, not a midwestern state where he's done well in the past, and not the state's legions of conservatives. Though Trump "won't secure the 1,237 delegates he needs to formally claim the nomination until June, his Indiana triumph makes it almost impossible to stop him. Following his decisive wins in New York and other East Coast states, the Indiana victory could put Trump within 200 delegates of the magic number he needs to clinch the nomination." Cruz, meanwhile, "now faces the agonizing choice of whether to remain in the race, with his attempt to force the party into a contested convention in tatters, or to bow out and cede the party nomination to his political nemesis." The Associated Press, which called the race at 7pm, predicts Trump will win at least 45 delegates.

Inside the AP’s Election Operation
6 hours ago
What’s the Average Household Income of a Trump Voter?
6 hours ago

Seventy-two thousand dollars, according to FiveThirtyEight. That's higher than the national average, as well as the average Clinton or Sanders voter, but lower than the average Kasich voter.