Why Gun Control Can’t Eliminate Gun Violence

Advocates push measures that might reduce everyday crime, but absent a ban on ownership, no recent tragedy would have been averted by regulation.

**ADVANCE FOR WEEEKEND, APRIL 12-13** A row of weapons is seen at the Richmond Gun Show at the Richmond International Raceway on Sunday, March 30, 2008.
National Journal
Fawn Johnson
See more stories about...
Fawn Johnson
Sept. 18, 2013, 1:32 a.m.

Noth­ing that gun-con­trol ad­voc­ates are push­ing for in Con­gress would have pre­ven­ted Monday’s shoot­ing ram­page at the Wash­ing­ton Navy Yard. And un­less this coun­try bans all per­son­al own­er­ship of guns, an­oth­er mass shoot­ing will oc­cur.

This is the greatest hurdle for the gun-con­trol move­ment. They seek changes to the law that a ma­jor­ity of the pub­lic sup­ports — ex­pan­ded back­ground checks, an as­sault weapons ban, and lim­its on high-ca­pa­city am­muni­tion. But they are up against for­mid­able op­pon­ents in the gun-rights groups. And the only time they get to talk about it is after a splashy, tra­gic in­cid­ent that does not rep­res­ent the bulk of gun deaths — sui­cides, street crimes, ac­ci­dents.

“You have to base the push around more than the out­rage on any one tragedy. It has to be based on our col­lect­ive de­sire to make this be the coun­try we all want it to be,” said Dan Gross, pres­id­ent of the Brady Cam­paign to Pre­vent Gun Vi­ol­ence. “In or­der to cre­ate the most mean­ing­ful change, we have to look at the gun vi­ol­ence that hap­pens every day.”

Pre­vent­ing every­day gun vi­ol­ence is hard, and it’s not go­ing to hap­pen overnight. Curb­ing gun vi­ol­ence from crim­in­als would re­quire ser­i­ous at­tempts to un­der­stand how guns get in­to their hands in the first place. Crim­in­als have only a few ways to get a gun, as­sum­ing they can’t pass a back­ground check — buy­ing it at a gun show or on­line, buy­ing it on the black mar­ket, or steal­ing it.

Stop­ping that is like a game of Whack-a-Mole. For each way that a crim­in­al gets a gun, you need a dif­fer­ent rule to stop it. Back­ground checks at gun shows are an ob­vi­ous way to get rid of one of a crim­in­al’s op­tions for get­ting a gun. But that doesn’t stop him or her from buy­ing a gun privately from straw pur­chasers. There are oth­er ways to pre­vent that kind of gun traf­fick­ing, but those laws in­ev­it­ably will have loop­holes or no one would be able to buy a gun at all.

Stop­ping gun traf­fick­ing is even harder if it has to hap­pen state by state. A now-ex­pired Vir­gin­ia law that only al­lowed people to buy one gun per month dra­mat­ic­ally re­duced the num­ber of Vir­gin­ia-pur­chased guns re­covered at crime scenes. That’s be­cause “crime guns” are of­ten pur­chased il­leg­ally by someone who buys them in bulk from a le­git­im­ate deal­er. But even when Vir­gin­ia’s law was in place (it ex­pired in 2012), the num­ber of “crime guns” from oth­er states in­creased.

And then there are the mass shoot­ings, which are even harder to pre­vent. “A de­ranged crazy per­son, largely in sui­cid­al range, de­cides to take out as many people as pos­sible — that’s the most dif­fi­cult of all,” said Richard Feld­man, pres­id­ent of the In­de­pend­ent Fire­arm Own­ers As­so­ci­ation.

To wit, the Navy Yard shoot­er Aaron Alex­is had a his­tory of vi­ol­ence, some brushes with the law, and a his­tory of neg­li­gence with a gun. But the cur­rent back­ground check laws couldn’t stop him from buy­ing a gun be­cause he wasn’t de­creed by a court to be men­tally in­com­pet­ent and he wasn’t a con­victed felon. He even had a se­cur­ity clear­ance that gave him ac­cess to a mil­it­ary com­pound, cour­tesy of an em­ploy­er that didn’t know about his stan­doffs with the loc­al po­lice or his prob­lems in the Navy Re­serve.

Back­ground checks have to ac­tu­ally de­tect prob­lems or they’re not go­ing to work. “This was a guy with a his­tory of vi­ol­ent be­ha­vi­or and reck­less­ness with fire­arms,” said Ladd Everitt, com­mu­nic­a­tions dir­ect­or for the Co­ali­tion to Stop Gun Vi­ol­ence. “There is no oth­er civ­il­ized so­ci­ety that would al­low him leg­ally to own a gun and carry it in pub­lic. “¦We have a reg­u­lat­ory sys­tem in this coun­try that is riddled with loop­holes and a joke.”

Some call them loop­holes. Some call them le­git­im­ate pro­tec­tions of gun own­ers’ rights. Either way, the pro­cess of cre­at­ing and us­ing any rules to curb gun vi­ol­ence will take gun rights in­to ac­count. That means com­prom­ise, and that means ex­cep­tions to the rules that could al­low an­oth­er vi­ol­ent in­cid­ent to oc­cur. It’s in­ev­it­able.

Does that mean the gun-con­trol ad­voc­ates should give up? They cer­tainly show no signs of it, al­though Gross thinks they should start talk­ing about the is­sue more hol­ist­ic­ally. “We need to be hav­ing a con­ver­sa­tion about guns like we have a con­ver­sa­tion about everything else in so­ci­ety that presents risks and re­wards — auto­mo­biles, swim­ming pools,” he said.

And even though the gun con­trol ad­voc­ates couldn’t muster the sup­port to pass a Sen­ate bill that ex­pan­ded back­ground checks in April, that only ad­ded fuel to their fire.

“Sarah Brady, after the Sen­ate vote, turned to me and see­ing how up­set I was — this was my first big policy fight — she said, ‘Some­times it takes a good de­feat,’” Gross said.

Sarah Brady ought to know. As the wife of Re­agan White House spokes­man Jim Brady, who was shot in an as­sas­sin­a­tion at­tempt 1981, she spent more than a dec­ade try­ing to get the first hand­gun back­ground check bill to pass. It took six votes in Con­gress over sev­en years.

What We're Following See More »
BACKING OUT ON BERNIE
Trump Won’t Debate Sanders After All
3 days ago
THE LATEST

Trump, in a statement: “Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. ... I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be.”

AKNOWLEDGING THE INEVITABLE
UAW: Time to Unite Behind Hillary
4 days ago
THE DETAILS

"It's about time for unity," said UAW President Dennis Williams. "We're endorsing Hillary Clinton. She's gotten 3 million more votes than Bernie, a million more votes than Donald Trump. She's our nominee." He called Sanders "a great friend of the UAW" while saying Trump "does not support the economic security of UAW families." Some 28 percent of UAW members indicated their support for Trump in an internal survey.

Source:
AP KEEPING COUNT
Trump Clinches Enough Delegates for the Nomination
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"Donald Trump on Thursday reached the number of delegates needed to clinch the Republican nomination for president, completing an unlikely rise that has upended the political landscape and sets the stage for a bitter fall campaign. Trump was put over the top in the Associated Press delegate count by a small number of the party's unbound delegates who told the AP they would support him at the convention."

Source:
TRUMP FLOATED IDEA ON JIMMY KIMMEL’S SHOW
Trump/Sanders Debate Before California Primary?
4 days ago
THE LATEST
CAMPAIGNS INJECTED NEW AD MONEY
California: It’s Not Over Yet
4 days ago
THE LATEST

"Clinton and Bernie Sanders "are now devoting additional money to television advertising. A day after Sanders announced a new ad buy of less than $2 million in the state, Clinton announced her own television campaign. Ads featuring actor Morgan Freeman as well as labor leader and civil rights activist Dolores Huerta will air beginning on Fridayin Fresno, Sacramento, and Los Angeles media markets. Some ads will also target Latino voters and Asian American voters. The total value of the buy is about six figures according to the Clinton campaign." Meanwhile, a new poll shows Sanders within the margin of error, trailing Clinton 44%-46%.

Source:
×