Boehner Serves Red Meat, and Republicans Eat It Up

The speaker’s plan on funding and delaying Obamacare reflects conservative wishes, but is mostly a play at unity, not policy.

Speaker of the House John Boehner, R-Ohio, and House Republican leaders emerge from a closed-door strategy session at the Capitol, Wednesday, Sept. 18, 2013. House GOP leaders are looking to reverse course and agree to tea party demands to try to use a vote this week on a must-pass temporary government funding bill to block implementation of President Barack Obama's health care law. Boehner is followed by House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif. 
National Journal
Tim Alberta
Sept. 18, 2013, 8:34 a.m.

Some of House Speak­er John Boehner’s fiercest con­ser­vat­ive crit­ics emerged from Wed­nes­day morn­ing’s GOP Con­fer­ence meet­ing vis­ibly elated, heap­ing praise on Boehner and his lead­er­ship team for their polit­ic­ally risky pro­pos­al to tem­por­ar­ily fund the gov­ern­ment while per­man­ently de­fund­ing Obama­care.

“I think our lead­er­ship has got it just right,” said Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, who dur­ing the pre­vi­ous Con­gress of­ten clashed with Boehner while lead­ing the Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee. Asked wheth­er con­ser­vat­ives are pleased with Boehner’s plan, Jordan replied, “Oh, yeah. Heck, yeah.”

“Everything I heard in there was very pos­it­ive,” said Rep. Mick Mul­vaney of South Car­o­lina, who voted against Boehner in Janu­ary’s lead­er­ship elec­tions.

Ad­ded Rep. Matt Sal­mon of Ari­zona: “I think it’s the best plan I’ve heard in a long time.”

En­thu­si­asm on the Right is seem­ingly jus­ti­fied. The pro­pos­al laid out by Boehner on Wed­nes­day morn­ing gives con­ser­vat­ives al­most ex­actly what they’ve been ask­ing for: A short-term con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion (this one ex­pires Dec. 15); an ex­ten­sion of cur­rent, post-se­quester spend­ing levels ($986.3 bil­lion, to be ex­act); and a prom­ise to per­man­ently re­move fund­ing for the Af­ford­able Care Act (a memo from lead­er­ship says the CR lan­guage will “per­man­ently and fully de­fund Obama­care spend­ing through pro­hib­it­ing dis­cre­tion­ary and man­dat­ory spend­ing and res­cind­ing all un­oblig­ated bal­ances”).

The fund­ing pro­pos­al also in­cor­por­ates the Full Faith and Cred­it Act, which lead­er­ship says would re­quire the Treas­ury De­part­ment “to make good on pub­lic debt pay­ments should Amer­ica reach the debt ceil­ing.” At the same time, it sets the table for a forth­com­ing GOP debt-ceil­ing pro­pos­al—per­haps ar­riv­ing as early as next week—that will tar­get long­time goals, such as en­ti­tle­ment re­forms, the Key­stone Pipeline, and, of course, de­fund­ing the Af­ford­able Care Act.

“This is a vic­tory for the Amer­ic­an people,” said Rep. Tom Graves of Geor­gia, who provided Boehner a blue­print with a bill that would fund the gov­ern­ment for fisc­al 2014 while delay­ing and de­fund­ing Obama­care un­til 2015. Graves, whose meas­ure had at­trac­ted up­wards of 70 con­ser­vat­ive co­spon­sors, said Boehner’s lead­er­ship team “was very re­cept­ive” to his ideas after their plan dis­solved late last week.

Boehner’s de­cision to back a spend­ing bill that de­funds Pres­id­ent Obama’s sig­na­ture do­mest­ic achieve­ment shifts the fo­cus to the Sen­ate, where Demo­crats could be forced to take a vote on the di­vis­ive health care law. “I think this is go­ing to be crit­ic­al to fi­nally force the Sen­ate to vote on a delay of Obama­care,” said Rep. Steve Scal­ise, chair­man of the Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee.

With a Demo­crat­ic ma­jor­ity in the up­per cham­ber, however, and Obama already vow­ing to de­feat any at­tempt to de­fund the health care law, it seems highly un­likely that this House pro­pos­al will ac­com­plish any­thing oth­er than unit­ing con­ser­vat­ives and shift­ing fo­cus to the Sen­ate—all while tak­ing Con­gress one step closer to a gov­ern­ment shut­down.

But in the ruth­less realm of in­tern­al GOP polit­ics, the anti-Obama­care pro­pos­al achieves what Rep. Paul Ry­an of Wis­con­sin called a “uni­fy­ing” pur­pose. Namely, it puts Boehner on the same page with his con­ser­vat­ive mem­bers, some of whom have openly ques­tioned wheth­er the speak­er has the stom­ach for fight­ing over Obama­care with a gov­ern­ment shut­down on the line.

“Today I heard a re­solve in the speak­er’s voice,” said Sal­mon. “Strategies come and go, but we want res­ults. We’ve got a very short win­dow to stop this thing from be­ing im­ple­men­ted. Today I heard in the speak­er’s voice a com­mit­ment—and a plan—to do that. And I’m ex­cited.”

Even mem­bers who have been con­sist­ently crit­ic­al of Boehner’s team—such as Rep. Tim Huel­skamp of Kan­sas—walked away from Wed­nes­day’s meet­ing feel­ing good about lead­er­ship’s plan. “It’s a very good sign; it’s a sign that they’re listen­ing,” he said.

Huel­skamp, who on Tues­day “guar­an­teed” that a Graves-style plan would win 218 Re­pub­lic­an votes on the House floor, stood by that pre­dic­tion Wed­nes­day. “I think so,” he said. “You put it on the floor, I think we all have to vote for it—un­less someone says it doesn’t go far enough, long enough, or deep enough.”

Of course, there are those mem­bers, too. “I can’t sup­port pro­posed CR,” Rep. Justin Amash of Michigan wrote on Twit­ter soon after the sum­mit ad­journed. “It’s a #Stealth­Debt­LimitH­ike; it ex­empts in­terest from debt lim­it, ef­fect­ively rais­ing debt lim­it per­man­ently.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4449) }}

What We're Following See More »
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
1 days ago

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
1 days ago

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
1 days ago

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.

Trump Is Still Ahead, but Who’s in Second?
18 hours ago

We may not be talking about New Hampshire primary polls for another three-and-a-half years, so here goes:

  • American Research Group’s tracking poll has Donald Trump in the lead with 30% support, followed by Marco Rubio and John Kasich tying for second place at 16%. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders leads Hillary Clinton 53%-41%.
  • The 7 News/UMass Lowell tracking poll has Trump way out front with 34%, followed by Rubio and Ted Cruz with 13% apiece. Among the Democrats, Sanders is in front 56%-40%.
  • A Gravis poll puts Trump ahead with 28%, followed by Kasich with 17% and Rubio with 15%.
CNN Calls the Primary for Sanders and Trump
5 hours ago

Well that didn’t take long. CNN has already declared Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump the winners of the New Hampshire primary, leaving the rest of the candidates to fight for the scraps. Five minutes later, the Associated Press echoed CNN’s call.