This isn’t the Cold War. But you wouldn’t know that by the way Americans now view Russia.
A new poll released by Gallup on Wednesday shows that for the first time in 15 years, more people in the U.S. think that Russia is unfriendly to American interests and is not an ally.
In the years after the fall of the Soviet Union, U.S. viewpoints of Russia improved steadily, and in 1999 more Americans finally considered Russia an ally and a friend than an enemy. The peak of the relationship between the two nations came in 2006, when 73 percent of Americans thought positively about Russia. Even in June of this year, 50 percent of Americans still maintained that Russia was friendly to U.S. interests.
But that’s changed in recent months, as the dysfunctional relationship between President Obama and Russian President Vladimir Putin took center stage.
And the negative reactions toward Russia don’t just stop at the broader level. Now, for the first time since he took office in 2000, a majority of Americans (54 percent) have an unfavorable view of Putin. Just 19 percent of Americans view Putin favorably.
That being said, it’s not as if a majority of Americans ever viewed him favorably. His height of popularity came in May 2002 at 41 percent.
Still, the fact that Russia seems more willing to assist in the dismantling of Syria’s chemical-weapons stockpile — and possibly reengage in peace talks to end the long civil war in the Middle Eastern country — is not lost on the American people. Of those polled, 72 percent approve of the U.S.-Russia plan agreed to over the weekend. Fifty percent of Americans think Putin’s involvement was helpful. The poll was, in fact, taken on Sept. 15 and 16, right after the new plan was announced.
So, while Putin’s engagement in recent weeks in foreign policy has been a positive step in the relationship between the U.S. and Russia, some major issues are still at play — not least of which is the Russian leader’s crackdown on gays and lesbians, in addition to him sheltering National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden. Both of the actions are disapproved by more than 60 percent of Americans who were aware of these steps taken by Putin.
President George W. Bush may have looked into Putin’s eyes, saw his soul and liked him, but the American people have looked into Putin’s actions, saw his record, and didn’t like what they saw.
The poll was conducted with 1,010 adults by phone with a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.
What We're Following See More »
Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.
Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”
Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."
In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-expected primary battle behind her, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) is no longer going on the air in upcoming primary states. “Team Clinton hasn’t spent a single cent in … California, Indiana, Kentucky, Oregon and West Virginia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “campaign has spent a little more than $1 million in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone backer in the Senate, said the candidate should end his presidential campaign if he’s losing to Hillary Clinton after the primary season concludes in June, breaking sharply with the candidate who is vowing to take his insurgent bid to the party convention in Philadelphia.”
The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."