Russia: U.N. ‘Politicized’ Analysis of Syria Nerve Gas Strike

Global Security Newswire Staff
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Sept. 18, 2013, 9:02 a.m.

A Rus­si­an of­fi­cial on Wed­nes­day ques­tioned the valid­ity of a new U.N. ana­lys­is of an Au­gust sar­in nerve agent strike in Syr­ia, rais­ing the pos­sib­il­ity that Rus­sia could sty­mie any moves by the United States and its al­lies to im­pose pun­ish­ment on Dam­as­cus for not sur­ren­der­ing its chem­ic­al ar­sen­al, Re­u­ters re­por­ted.

“We are dis­ap­poin­ted, to put it mildly, about the ap­proach taken by the U.N. sec­ret­ari­at and the U.N. in­spect­ors, who pre­pared the re­port se­lect­ively and in­com­pletely,” Rus­si­an Deputy For­eign Min­is­ter Sergei Ry­ab­kov told his coun­try’s RIA Nov­osti news agency. He re­ferred to the U.N. forensic ana­lys­is, re­leased on Monday, as “politi­cized” and “one-sided.”

The United Na­tions’ ana­lys­is con­firms chem­ic­al weapons were used in the Aug. 21 at­tack in a sub­urb of Dam­a­cus, but doesn’t as­sign blame on the gov­ern­ment or rebel fight­ers.

The Syr­i­an re­gime, mean­while, has handed Rus­si­an of­fi­cials what Ry­ab­kov on Wed­nes­day de­scribed as “evid­ence that the [Syr­i­an] rebels are im­plic­ated in the chem­ic­al at­tack,” Agence France-Presse quoted him as say­ing after he met with Syr­i­an Pres­id­ent Bashar As­sad’s top en­voy. Mo­scow will “ex­am­ine the Syr­i­an ma­ter­i­als im­plic­at­ing the rebels with the ut­most ser­i­ous­ness,” he ad­ded in com­ments re­por­ted by Rus­si­an me­dia.

Speak­ing on Tues­day, Rus­si­an For­eign Min­is­ter Sergei Lav­rov said there are “ser­i­ous grounds to be­lieve that this [Aug. 21 at­tack] was a pro­voca­tion” in­ten­ded to prompt “for­eign in­ter­ven­tion” against the As­sad re­gime in the Middle East­ern coun­try’s bloody civil war, Re­u­ters re­por­ted. Lav­rov, at a press brief­ing in Mo­scow, called for the U.N. find­ings to be ex­amined along­side a re­port­er’s testi­mony, state­ments from “nuns at a nearby con­vent,” and data found on­line.

Wash­ing­ton’s en­voy to the United Na­tions, though, on Tues­day said the U.N. find­ings “make clear” that last month’s strike was the work of As­sad’s re­gime. The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion has blamed the in­cid­ent for the deaths of more than 1,400 people, and only backed away from threats of an im­me­di­ate mil­it­ary re­sponse after ham­mer­ing out plans with Rus­sia for elim­in­at­ing the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment’s chem­ic­al-war­fare stocks.

“Rock­ets that the U.N. says were used in the at­tack and that tested pos­it­ive for sar­in are the same rock­ets used by the re­gime in pre­vi­ous at­tacks,” U.S. Am­bas­sad­or to the United Na­tions Sam­antha Power stated at a U.N. Gen­er­al As­sembly dis­cus­sion. “They bore none of the char­ac­ter­ist­ics of jerry-rigged, im­pro­vised weapons. They had soph­ist­ic­ated ba­ro­met­ric fuses to dis­perse the nerve agent in the air and not on im­pact.”

U.N. find­ings also in­dic­ate that sar­in from the strike was of high­er qual­ity than ma­ter­i­al once stock­piled by Ir­aq un­der Sad­dam Hus­sein, Power said.

“This was a pro­fes­sion­ally ex­ecuted mas­sacre by the [As­sad] re­gime, which is known to pos­sess one of the world’s largest un­declared stock­piles of sar­in,” she said.

French For­eign Min­is­ter Laurent Fabi­us offered a sim­il­ar take on the U.N. re­port, Re­u­ters re­por­ted. “When you look at the amount of sar­in gas used, the vec­tors, the tech­niques be­hind such an at­tack, as well as oth­er as­pects, it seems to leave no doubt that the re­gime is be­hind it,” Fabi­us said on Tues­day.

Rus­sia does not want an ini­tial U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil res­ol­u­tion on the dis­arm­a­ment plan to en­dorse armed strikes or oth­er pun­it­ive ac­tion for pos­sible non­com­pli­ance by Dam­as­cus, though it has not ruled out al­low­ing such au­thor­iz­a­tion at a later date, en­voys told the New York Times for a Tues­day art­icle. Mo­scow wields veto au­thor­ity on the 15-na­tion body.

The United States will “con­tin­ue to press” for a U.N. meas­ure that per­mits pun­it­ive steps, U.S. Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry said in Tues­day com­ments re­por­ted by Re­u­ters. Syr­ia’s chem­ic­al dis­arm­a­ment “will hap­pen only with the United Na­tions passing a strong res­ol­u­tion. It will hap­pen with the en­force­ment of the world, with Rus­sia stand­ing by us in this ef­fort,” he said.

Still, the United States “re­serves the right to take mil­it­ary ac­tion” in­de­pend­ent of U.N. au­thor­iz­a­tion, State De­part­ment spokes­wo­man Jen Psaki told re­port­ers on Tues­day.

What We're Following See More »
BUT IS HE A YES VOTE?
Cornyn Attempting to Get McCain Back for Health Vote
2 minutes ago
THE LATEST
“TIME HAD RUN OUT” FOR ILL BABY
Charlie Gard’s Parents End Legal Fight
26 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"A lawyer representing Chris Gard and Connie Yates told the High Court 'time had run out' for the baby. Mr. Gard said it meant his 'sweet, gorgeous, innocent little boy' will not reach his first birthday on 4 August. 'To let our beautiful little Charlie go' is 'the hardest thing we'll ever have to do,' his mother said. Charlie's parents said they made the decision because a US doctor had told them it was now too late to give Charlie nucleoside therapy.

Source:
AGENCY SOUGHT TO DELAY IMPLEMENTATION
11 States Sue EPA Over Chemical Rule
28 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"Eleven states have sued the Environmental Protection Agency over its June decision to delay implementation of a chemical safety rule" until 2019. "The state attorneys general, led by New York’s Eric Schneiderman (D), argue the rule is important for 'protecting our workers, first-responders and communities from chemical accidents' and should be allowed to take affect as planned by the Obama administration’s EPA.

Source:
ULTIMATUM ON ACA
Trump: You’re With Us Or Against Us
46 minutes ago
THE LATEST
$1.6 BILLION SET ASIDE FOR WALL
House Freedom Caucus Chair: Shutdown Over Wall Funding Unlikely
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) on Monday said that funding for President Trump's controversial border wall is unlikely to cause a government shutdown. 'The odds of a government shutdown are very minimal when it comes to that,' the conservative lawmaker said at an event in Washington, D.C. 'I do think the funding of the border wall will happen,' he added. Appropriators have set aside $1.6 billion to fund new wall and fencing sections on parts of the U.S.-Mexico border covering a few dozen miles."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login