Sen. Collins: ‘It Defies Belief’ That Navy Yard Shooter, Edward Snowden Were Given Security Clearances

The Maine Republican is calling for a “thorough congressional investigation” of the clearance system.

National Journal
Matt Berman
See more stories about...
Matt Berman
Sept. 19, 2013, 4:56 a.m.

Sen. Susan Collins, a Re­pub­lic­an mem­ber of the Sen­ate In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee, blas­ted the se­cur­ity-clear­ance pro­cess for some gov­ern­ment con­tract­ors on Wed­nes­day, telling Na­tion­al Journ­al, “In both the case of the Navy Yard shoot­er and Ed­ward Snowden, it de­fies be­lief that they were giv­en se­cur­ity clear­ances, giv­en their back­grounds.”

The shoot­er at Wash­ing­ton’s Navy Yard was hired in Septem­ber 2012 by a sub­con­tract­or for Hew­lett-Pack­ard, where he was gran­ted secret-level clear­ance. Ed­ward Snowden, who leaked a trove of NSA doc­u­ments, was a con­tract­or and com­puter sys­tems ad­min­is­trat­or for Booz Al­len Hamilton. While the two cases are ob­vi­ously drastic­ally dif­fer­ent — no mat­ter how bad you think Snowden’s ac­tions were, he cer­tainly didn’t kill any­body — they high­light a grow­ing con­cern in Con­gress about ex­actly who is get­ting high-level se­cur­ity clear­ances, and how easy it may be for the wrong people to ac­quire them.

Sen. Collins isn’t the only per­son voicing such con­cern. On Wed­nes­day, four sen­at­ors sent a let­ter to In­spect­or Gen­er­al Patrick E. Mc­Far­land call­ing for an in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to how the Navy Yard shoot­er re­ceived his clear­ance. The sen­at­ors were par­tic­u­larly in­ter­ested in how he was able to get that clear­ance des­pite “his pat­terns of mis­con­duct.”

In an e-mail to Na­tion­al Journ­al, Collins also out­lined what she would like to hap­pen:

The first step is a thor­ough con­gres­sion­al in­vest­ig­a­tion. I’m hope­ful that the In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee will ex­pand the work that we’re already do­ing to learn how Ed­ward Snowden was able to get such a high se­cur­ity clear­ance, and I’ve also talked to the Chair­man of the Home­land Se­cur­ity Com­mit­tee which has jur­is­dic­tion over the Of­fice of Per­son­nel Man­age­ment and en­cour­aged that com­mit­tee to take a look at wheth­er too much of this work is be­ing con­trac­ted out.

Sen­ate Home­land Se­cur­ity Chair­man Tom Carp­er, D-Del., told re­port­ers Wed­nes­day, “I think there’s real in­terest in fo­cus­ing on back­ground checks for con­tract­ors. We’re go­ing to drill down on this.” On Tues­day, the White House an­nounced that the Of­fice of Man­age­ment and Budget would be­gin a re­view of the se­cur­ity-clear­ance pro­cess for con­tract­ors and fed­er­al em­ploy­ees in co­ordin­a­tion with the Dir­ect­or of Na­tion­al In­tel­li­gence Of­fice and the Of­fice of Per­son­nel Man­age­ment.

It’s not yet cer­tain how far this will go, or how much Con­gress will be able to re­form the se­cur­ity-clear­ance pro­cess for con­tract­ors. But with 13 people dead, it’s hard to see this is­sue just fad­ing away.

What We're Following See More »
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×