Lara Brown Focuses on Putting Political Theory Into Practice at GWU

National Journal
Christopher Snow Hopkins
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Christopher Snow Hopkins
Sept. 19, 2013, 3:30 p.m.

Pon­der­ing the League of Na­tions, the break­up of the So­viet Uni­on, or even car­bon reg­u­lat­ory re­gimes is a far cry from ac­tu­ally get­ting things done on Cap­it­ol Hill.

“Polit­ic­al sci­ence tends to have a the­or­et­ic­al, sci­entif­ic em­phas­is, and one of the things it hasn’t done re­cently is ad­dress what hap­pens in the real world of prac­ti­cing polit­ics,” said Lara Brown, the new head of George Wash­ing­ton Uni­versity’s polit­ic­al man­age­ment pro­gram.

In part be­cause of its prox­im­ity to Cap­it­ol Hill, George Wash­ing­ton Uni­versity’s Gradu­ate School of Polit­ic­al Man­age­ment has al­ways had a more prag­mat­ic out­look than some of its com­pet­it­ors in the polit­ic­al-sci­ence arena. Foun­ded in 1987, it is over­seen by former three-term Rep. Mark Kennedy, R-Minn. — who va­cated his seat in 2007 to mount an un­suc­cess­ful sen­at­ori­al bid — and em­phas­izes “ap­plied polit­ics,” or how the saus­age gets made, rather than how the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment ought to run.

“We’re the pro­gram for stu­dents who have an un­der­gradu­ate de­gree in polit­ic­al sci­ence and love polit­ics but don’t really want to go to law school and are not ne­ces­sar­ily in­ter­ested in a spe­cif­ic policy area,” Brown said. “There are a whole bunch of kids like that.”

In short, GSPM is a hatch­ery for polit­ic­al op­er­at­ives. “What an M.B.A. is to an eco­nom­ics de­part­ment, that’s what we are to a polit­ic­al-sci­ence de­part­ment.”

Brown, 43, is well suited for an icon­o­clast­ic pro­gram like GSPM, hav­ing pre­vi­ously served as an Edu­ca­tion De­part­ment of­fi­cial in the Clin­ton ad­min­is­tra­tion; she is cur­rently moon­light­ing as a blog­ger for U.S. News & World Re­port.

In the con­text of Wash­ing­ton — where self-made pun­dits abound but few are con­vers­ant in the meth­od­o­logy of polit­ic­al sci­ence — Brown’s ob­ser­va­tions carry spe­cial weight. In the last chapter of her 2011 book, Jock­ey­ing for the Amer­ic­an Pres­id­ency: The Polit­ic­al Op­por­tunism of As­pir­ants, she cites Pres­id­ent Obama’s “op­por­tunism” as the char­ac­ter­ist­ic that pro­pelled him in­to the Oval Of­fice.

“The pro­fes­sion tends to see pres­id­en­tial suc­cess com­ing from am­bi­tion or [for­tu­it­ous] tim­ing or a struc­tur­al is­sue, like a bad eco­nomy,” she said. “But the vast ma­jor­ity of in­di­vidu­als who are party nom­in­ees broke through in a pretty big way the cycle be­fore they were elec­ted.”

In oth­er words, they es­tab­lished them­selves as front-run­ners years be­fore the con­tours of the elec­tion took shape.

Brown, who is not mar­ried and lives in Wash­ing­ton, has a Ph.D. from the Uni­versity of Cali­for­nia (Los Angeles), where she wrote her dis­ser­ta­tion on the elect­or­al con­sequences (or lack there­of) of con­gres­sion­al scan­dals. Her thes­is hinged on the “hy­po­crisy factor,” which neatly ac­counts for why mor­al and mon­et­ary im­pro­pri­et­ies af­fect Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats dif­fer­ently.

“If you’re a Demo­crat, and you por­tray your­self as someone who cares deeply about justice and fair­ness while sim­ul­tan­eously tak­ing bribes, that’s really prob­lem­at­ic,” Brown said. “And, con­versely, for Re­pub­lic­ans who spend a lot of time talk­ing about fam­ily val­ues, hav­ing an ex­tramar­it­al af­fair is really prob­lem­at­ic.”

Be­fore join­ing the fac­ulty at GWU, Brown taught at Vil­lan­ova Uni­versity, out­side Phil­adelphia.

What We're Following See More »
Durbin Says Government Shutdown Possible
12 minutes ago
Jewish Community Keeps Receiving Threats
19 minutes ago
SCOTUS Leaves Political Ad Disclosure Law In Place
3 hours ago

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear an appeal to the "federal disclosure rules for political advertising," leaving in place the ruling by a lower court upholding a law requiring the disclosure of donors to political ads. The appeal came from "a Denver-based libertarian think tank that wanted to run an ad without being forced to divulge its major donors," which argued that the requirement was a violation of first amendment rights under the Court's Citizens United decision.

Trump Meets with Health Execs
4 hours ago
Trump Budget Would Bump Defense Spending by $54 Billion
4 hours ago

"The Trump administration is proposing a budget it says will increase defense spending by $54 billion and cut non-defense spending by the same amount. The White House is sending a topline budget proposal reflecting those figures to federal agencies on Monday afternoon, according to an Office of Management and Budget official." An unnamed OMB official said most federal agencies would face cutbacks.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.