Who’s Pushing the GOP’s Obamacare Strategy?

80 lawmakers signed the letter now driving Boehner’s approach. A National Journal analysis finds it’s not just right-wingers out to kill this program.

Mark Meadows, North Carolina District 11. 
National Journal
Scott Bland
See more stories about...
Scott Bland
Sept. 20, 2013, 7:01 a.m.

When House Re­pub­lic­ans line up to vote on the ap­pro­pri­ations bill they have craf­ted to keep the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment run­ning, there won’t be much sus­pense about the res­ult. The real in­trigue lay in the story of how we got here, in which the 80 House Re­pub­lic­ans who signed onto a let­ter ur­ging GOP lead­er­ship to ad­opt this strategy played an out­sized role.

The nar­rat­ive goes something like this: Those mem­bers, and the con­stitu­ents and ad­vocacy groups that pres­sured them dur­ing the Au­gust re­cess, launched a right-wing re­bel­lion that forced their col­leagues to ad­opt de­fund­ing Obama­care as their cent­ral budget­ary goal. But in truth, a look at just who signed GOP Rep. Mark Mead­ows’s let­ter shows that this pres­sure came not from the House Re­pub­lic­an con­fer­ence’s right wing, but from its core. Those mem­bers hail from dis­tricts all over the coun­try that, over­all, look a lot like the av­er­age con­stitu­ency rep­res­en­ted by Re­pub­lic­ans in Con­gress.

Time and time again, when House le­gis­la­tion draws con­tro­versy, some ques­tion, or lament, or gloat, that the GOP con­fer­ence is “held host­age” by an un­reas­on­able few. But these mem­bers are an ac­cur­ate rep­res­ent­a­tion of their col­leagues — which is why this le­gis­lat­ive push, like oth­ers in the past, has be­come the party po­s­i­tion.

There are some im­port­ant dif­fer­ences between the let­ter-sign­ers and their col­leagues, es­pe­cially at the vul­ner­able end of the polit­ic­al spec­trum, ac­cord­ing to fig­ures com­piled by Pol­idata for the Cook Polit­ic­al Re­port and the Al­man­ac of Amer­ic­an Polit­ics. None of the 17 Re­pub­lic­ans who rep­res­ent dis­tricts Pres­id­ent Obama car­ried in 2012 signed the let­ter. About one-third of GOP mem­bers are from turf where Rom­ney got less than 55 per­cent of the vote, but their sig­na­tures ap­pear at half that rate on Mead­ows’s let­ter. But those mem­bers fit in­to a broad­er pat­tern in the Re­pub­lic­an House, where rep­res­ent­at­ives to­ward the more vul­ner­able end of the spec­trum have gladly signed onto some of their party’s more dar­ing le­gis­lat­ive moves over the last three years, es­pe­cially as com­pared to Blue Dog Demo­crats who helped mod­er­ate their party’s le­gis­lat­ive ef­forts dur­ing Obama’s first two years in of­fice and of­ten aban­doned them out­right. That pat­tern will soon play it­self out again, when House Re­pub­lic­ans’ con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion comes up for a vote.

As far as the let­ter goes, a look at the over­all polit­ic­al situ­ation across those 80 mem­bers’ dis­tricts is par­tic­u­larly in­struct­ive. In the 234 House dis­tricts con­trolled by Re­pub­lic­ans, their 2012 pres­id­en­tial nom­in­ee won a little over 58 per­cent of the vote. Rom­ney car­ried the let­ter-sign­ers’ seats by only a little more (un­der 61 per­cent). Look­ing at either the mean or me­di­an, the av­er­age Re­pub­lic­an who signed the let­ter isn’t from a dis­trict that’s mean­ing­fully more con­ser­vat­ive than that of the av­er­age House Re­pub­lic­an over­all.

The group of let­ter-sign­ers is dom­in­ated by South­ern­ers and new mem­bers — but so is the Re­pub­lic­an con­fer­ence as a whole. Nearly half of House Re­pub­lic­ans are from the South, a ra­tio that just ticks over 50 per­cent on the let­ter. And al­though 58 per­cent of the names on the let­ter were first elec­ted to Con­gress in 2010 or 2012, in­clud­ing mem­bers who re­turned after pre­vi­ous ser­vice, so were nearly half of House Re­pub­lic­ans as a whole.

One cent­ral group is heav­ily over-rep­res­en­ted on Mead­ows’s let­ter: mem­bers of the Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee, the Hill’s club for card-car­ry­ing con­ser­vat­ives. Sev­enty-six of the 80 let­ter-sign­ers are RSC mem­bers. But so is a ma­jor­ity of the House Re­pub­lic­an ma­jor­ity. The group of rep­res­ent­at­ives that made the latest Obama­care vote hap­pen live up to their titles — rep­res­ent­at­ive — as far as the GOP con­fer­ence goes.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×