CRUZ

Filling in the Blanks

Cruz profiled in <em>GQ</em>, prepping for consequential budget fight amidst GOP sniping.

Add to Briefcase
Sept. 23, 2013, 7:25 a.m.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) was the sub­ject of a GQ pro­file. High­lights:

— “As a law stu­dent at Har­vard, he re­fused to study with any­one who hadn’t been an un­der­grad at Har­vard, Prin­ceton, or Yale. Says Da­mon Wat­son, one of Cruz’s law-school room­mates: ‘He said he didn’t want any­body from ‘minor Ivies’ like Penn or Brown.’”

— “Cruz blew his first big shot in polit­ics. Back in 2000, he had scored a plum as­sign­ment work­ing in the policy shop of George W. Bush’s Aus­tin-based pres­id­en­tial cam­paign. He dis­tin­guished him­self in the weeks after the elec­tion, serving on the leg­al team that helped Bush win the Flor­ida re­count … But Cruz’s per­son­al style earned him many de­tract­ors in Bush­World. … When it came time to divvy up the spoils of vic­tory, many of Cruz’s cam­paign col­leagues headed to the White House; Cruz went to Wash­ing­ton, too — but he was ex­iled to the out­er Siber­ia of the Fed­er­al Trade Com­mis­sion. Says one friend: ‘He was pretty crushed.’”

Na­tion­al Re­view writer Ramesh Pon­nuru dis­tills Cruz’s ap­peal — and how he’s matched to the mo­ment: “The two things that con­ser­vat­ives are tired of are politi­cians who sell out and politi­cians who em­bar­rass them by not be­ing able to make an ac­count of them­selves.” Cruz is the an­ti­thes­is of both types. Cruz: “I don’t know a con­ser­vat­ive who didn’t feel em­bar­rassed vot­ing in 2006 or 2008. I think the Re­pub­lic­an Party lost its way. We didn’t stand for the prin­ciples we’re sup­posed to be­lieve in.” (GQ)

OBAMA­CARE: Cruz ap­peared on Fox News’s “Fox News Sunday,” where he out­lined his evolving strategy to de­fund Obama­care via the con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion to fund the gov­ern­ment, which now in­cludes block­ing con­sid­er­a­tion for the House bill he pushed for if it looks like Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id (D) will be able to strip out the pro­vi­sions that de­fund Obama­care. FNS host Chris Wal­lace said on the pro­gram that he had Re­pub­lic­ans send­ing him “un­so­li­cited re­search and ques­tions” on Cruz, a sign of in­tra-party an­ger at his bar­gain­ing po­s­i­tion. (Fox News)

Wash­ing­ton Post‘s Chris Cil­lizza and Sean Sul­li­van la­bel this “the most im­port­ant week” of Cruz’s ca­reer: “Cruz has shown a re­mark­able ad­ept­ness at play­ing the out­side game, burn­ish­ing his cre­den­tials as someone who doesn’t know or care about the ways of Wash­ing­ton be­cause those ways are broken and don’t serve the pub­lic. But, this is a week in which Cruz will need to show some level of dex­ter­ity at the in­side game as well. … While your own party es­tab­lish­ment prob­ably can’t keep you from a pres­id­en­tial nom­in­a­tion, they can make it a heck of a lot harder to win one. … [The] key to meas­ur­ing Cruz’s suc­cess will be what ap­proach he takes to mak­ing his op­pos­i­tion to Obama­care known and what (if any) im­pact it has. Does Cruz launch a tra­di­tion­al talk­ing fili­buster, a doomed but prin­cipled ef­fort to show how strongly he op­poses the meas­ure? If he doesn’t, is he able to con­vince/ca­jole a hand­ful of waver­ing Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­ors to vote against clo­ture? Can Cruz make enough of a stand in the Sen­ate to stiffen the spines of House Re­pub­lic­ans — as­sum­ing the le­gis­la­tion, sans de­fund­ing Obama­care, is headed their way some time in the next week?” (Wash­ing­ton Post)

“After be­ing chal­lenged by House Re­pub­lic­ans, Cruz and his al­lies might have no choice oth­er than to wage some sort of fili­buster — per­haps not by tra­di­tion­al means but us­ing pro­ced­ur­al tricks. … The con­ser­vat­ive ef­fort to tie the fund­ing of the pres­id­ent’s health-care law to wheth­er or not the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment stays open on Oct. 1 could VERY WELL blow up in the GOP’s face. But even if that hap­pens, some non-DC con­ser­vat­ives are already try­ing to make Ted Cruz a mar­tyr.” (NBC News)
— Scott Bland

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
4 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
4 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
4 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
5 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
5 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login