CRUZ

Filling in the Blanks

Cruz profiled in <em>GQ</em>, prepping for consequential budget fight amidst GOP sniping.

Add to Briefcase
Sept. 23, 2013, 7:25 a.m.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) was the sub­ject of a GQ pro­file. High­lights:

— “As a law stu­dent at Har­vard, he re­fused to study with any­one who hadn’t been an un­der­grad at Har­vard, Prin­ceton, or Yale. Says Da­mon Wat­son, one of Cruz’s law-school room­mates: ‘He said he didn’t want any­body from ‘minor Ivies’ like Penn or Brown.’”

— “Cruz blew his first big shot in polit­ics. Back in 2000, he had scored a plum as­sign­ment work­ing in the policy shop of George W. Bush’s Aus­tin-based pres­id­en­tial cam­paign. He dis­tin­guished him­self in the weeks after the elec­tion, serving on the leg­al team that helped Bush win the Flor­ida re­count … But Cruz’s per­son­al style earned him many de­tract­ors in Bush­World. … When it came time to divvy up the spoils of vic­tory, many of Cruz’s cam­paign col­leagues headed to the White House; Cruz went to Wash­ing­ton, too — but he was ex­iled to the out­er Siber­ia of the Fed­er­al Trade Com­mis­sion. Says one friend: ‘He was pretty crushed.’”

Na­tion­al Re­view writer Ramesh Pon­nuru dis­tills Cruz’s ap­peal — and how he’s matched to the mo­ment: “The two things that con­ser­vat­ives are tired of are politi­cians who sell out and politi­cians who em­bar­rass them by not be­ing able to make an ac­count of them­selves.” Cruz is the an­ti­thes­is of both types. Cruz: “I don’t know a con­ser­vat­ive who didn’t feel em­bar­rassed vot­ing in 2006 or 2008. I think the Re­pub­lic­an Party lost its way. We didn’t stand for the prin­ciples we’re sup­posed to be­lieve in.” (GQ)

OBAMA­CARE: Cruz ap­peared on Fox News’s “Fox News Sunday,” where he out­lined his evolving strategy to de­fund Obama­care via the con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion to fund the gov­ern­ment, which now in­cludes block­ing con­sid­er­a­tion for the House bill he pushed for if it looks like Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id (D) will be able to strip out the pro­vi­sions that de­fund Obama­care. FNS host Chris Wal­lace said on the pro­gram that he had Re­pub­lic­ans send­ing him “un­so­li­cited re­search and ques­tions” on Cruz, a sign of in­tra-party an­ger at his bar­gain­ing po­s­i­tion. (Fox News)

Wash­ing­ton Post‘s Chris Cil­lizza and Sean Sul­li­van la­bel this “the most im­port­ant week” of Cruz’s ca­reer: “Cruz has shown a re­mark­able ad­ept­ness at play­ing the out­side game, burn­ish­ing his cre­den­tials as someone who doesn’t know or care about the ways of Wash­ing­ton be­cause those ways are broken and don’t serve the pub­lic. But, this is a week in which Cruz will need to show some level of dex­ter­ity at the in­side game as well. … While your own party es­tab­lish­ment prob­ably can’t keep you from a pres­id­en­tial nom­in­a­tion, they can make it a heck of a lot harder to win one. … [The] key to meas­ur­ing Cruz’s suc­cess will be what ap­proach he takes to mak­ing his op­pos­i­tion to Obama­care known and what (if any) im­pact it has. Does Cruz launch a tra­di­tion­al talk­ing fili­buster, a doomed but prin­cipled ef­fort to show how strongly he op­poses the meas­ure? If he doesn’t, is he able to con­vince/ca­jole a hand­ful of waver­ing Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­ors to vote against clo­ture? Can Cruz make enough of a stand in the Sen­ate to stiffen the spines of House Re­pub­lic­ans — as­sum­ing the le­gis­la­tion, sans de­fund­ing Obama­care, is headed their way some time in the next week?” (Wash­ing­ton Post)

“After be­ing chal­lenged by House Re­pub­lic­ans, Cruz and his al­lies might have no choice oth­er than to wage some sort of fili­buster — per­haps not by tra­di­tion­al means but us­ing pro­ced­ur­al tricks. … The con­ser­vat­ive ef­fort to tie the fund­ing of the pres­id­ent’s health-care law to wheth­er or not the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment stays open on Oct. 1 could VERY WELL blow up in the GOP’s face. But even if that hap­pens, some non-DC con­ser­vat­ives are already try­ing to make Ted Cruz a mar­tyr.” (NBC News)
— Scott Bland

What We're Following See More »
FBI TURNED DOWN REQUEST
Report: Trump Asked FBI to Deny Russia Stories
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"The FBI rejected a recent White House request to publicly knock down media reports about communications between Donald Trump's associates and Russians known to US intelligence during the 2016 presidential campaign, multiple US officials briefed on the matter tell CNN. But a White House official said late Thursday that the request was only made after the FBI indicated to the White House it did not believe the reporting to be accurate."

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Many Signatures Has the Petition for Trump’s Tax Returns Received?
3 days ago
THE ANSWER

More than 1 million, setting a record. More than 100,000 signatures triggers an official White House response.

Source:
TIED TO RUSSIA INVESTIGATION
Sen. Collins Open to Subpoena of Trump’s Tax Returns
3 days ago
THE LATEST

Sen. Susan Collins, who sits on the Intelligence Committee, "said on Wednesday she's open to using a subpoena to investigate President Donald Trump's tax returns for potential connections to Russia." She said the committee is also open to subpoenaing Trump himself. "This is a counter-intelligence operation in many ways," she said of Russia's interference. "That's what our committee specializes in. We are used to probing in depth in this area."

Source:
NPR ALSO LAUNCHES ETHICS WATCH
Obama Staffers Launch Group to Monitor Trump Ethics
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

"Top lawyers who helped the Obama White House craft and hold to rules of conduct believe President Donald Trump and his staff will break ethics norms meant to guard against politicization of the government — and they’ve formed a new group to prepare, and fight. United to Protect Democracy, which draws its name from a line in President Barack Obama’s farewell address that urged his supporters to pick up where he was leaving off, has already raised a $1.5 million operating budget, hired five staffers and has plans to double that in the coming months." Meanwhile, NPR has launched a "Trump Ethics Monitor" to track the resolution of ten ethics-related promises that the president has made.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login