Why the U.N. Is Suddenly Relevant

On Syria and Iran, the Security Council debate could determine Obama’s foreign-policy legacy.

President Barack Obama chairs a meeting of the United Nations Security Council at the United Nations headquarters, Thursday, Sept. 24, 2009. 
National Journal
Michael Hirsh
See more stories about...
Michael Hirsh
Sept. 23, 2013, 12:42 p.m.

When it comes to make-be­lieve for­eign policy, usu­ally noth­ing beats the an­nu­al meet­ings of the U.N. Gen­er­al As­sembly. Each Septem­ber, mem­ber na­tions of the or­gan­iz­a­tion that Pres­id­ent Obama re­cently de­cried as “para­lyzed” each get to per­form, some­times an­tic­ally, at the po­di­um. And ab­so­lutely noth­ing gets done.

That’s es­pe­cially the view in Wash­ing­ton, which more of­ten than not sees the big green build­ing on the East River as a gi­ant, musty en­cum­brance. But sud­denly the United Na­tions has be­come freshly rel­ev­ant, more so than it has been in years, cer­tainly for all of Obama’s first term. And new U.N. Am­bas­sad­or Sam­antha Power, who is largely un­tested as a dip­lo­mat, finds her­self in a very hot spot­light, one that might even make her pre­de­cessor, new Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Ad­visor Susan Rice, a touch re­gret­ful that she de­par­ted New York so soon.

In­deed, in com­ing months the ac­tions of the U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil could de­term­ine Obama’s ma­jor for­eign-policy leg­acy, even more so than his take­down of Osama bin Laden, on the long-fes­ter­ing is­sues of Ir­an’s nuc­le­ar pro­gram and Syr­ia’s civil war.

In both cases a leg­al de­pend­ency on the U.N. Charter and pre­vi­ous Se­cur­ity Coun­cil res­ol­u­tions will be cru­cial to suc­cess. It already seems clear that it was, more than any­thing, the sharp bite of U.N.-ap­proved sanc­tions on Ir­an that led to the sur­prise elec­tion of mod­er­ate Pres­id­ent Has­san Rouh­ani, who has prac­tic­ally tripped over him­self of­fer­ing to ne­go­ti­ate and whose much-an­ti­cip­ated speech Tues­day is ex­pec­ted to give clues as to his flex­ib­il­ity. It is also clear that pre­vi­ous U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil res­ol­u­tions dat­ing back to 2006 and de­mand­ing that Tehran sus­pend urani­um en­rich­ment will, more than any­thing else, put Rouh­ani’s sin­cer­ity and in­ter­na­tion­al­ism to the test. On Syr­ia — an is­sue on which Obama has looked con­sist­ently weak for two years — it is also a U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil res­ol­u­tion that will en­force the deus-ex-mach­ina deal that Mo­scow and Wash­ing­ton sud­denly already agreed upon to dis­mantle Bashar al”“As­sad’s chem­ic­al weapons.

The Rus­si­ans are res­ist­ing any men­tion of force in the new res­ol­u­tion, and Obama has pledged to keep open his earli­er threat to at­tack Syr­ia uni­lat­er­ally if it does not com­ply. But even here, says John Bellinger, the former leg­al coun­sel to the State De­part­ment, the pres­id­ent’s best ar­gu­ment rests on the U.N. charter’s “Chapter 7” guar­an­tee of the right to “col­lect­ive self-de­fense.” Bellinger, who served un­der George W. Bush, says the pre­vi­ous pres­id­ent might have won more sup­port in Ir­aq had he done something sim­il­ar. “My ad­vice to Obama would be same: Rather than rely on new and un­tested the­or­ies such as pree­mp­tion or hu­man­it­ari­an in­ter­ven­tion, em­phas­ize more a re­li­ance on the U.N. charter it­self.”

Amer­ic­an policy-makers have rarely paid much re­spect to the U.N. Gen­er­al As­sembly, an ob­strep­er­ous talk­ing shop built on the pre­tense that the vote of Zi­m­b­ab­we or Liecht­en­stein is as im­port­ant as that of the United States. U.S. pres­id­ents have also grown im­pa­tient with the Se­cur­ity Coun­cil, which Frank­lin Roosevelt set up to­ward the end of World War II as a glob­al poli­cing body. Pres­id­ents, in­clud­ing Obama, tend to see the Se­cur­ity Coun­cil as a stag­nant pool of lost great-power am­bi­tions, a pre­tend-place where a Rus­sia can puff it­self up in­to an im­age of its former self. Un­der Vladi­mir Putin, Mo­scow has of­ten done just that, veto­ing every res­ol­u­tion that might have au­thor­ized an in­ter­ven­tion in Syr­ia over the last two years.

But now Rus­sia has pub­licly com­mit­ted it­self to a U.N.-au­thor­ized dis­mant­ling of Syr­ia’s chem­ic­al weapons — and if Mo­scow fol­lows through, that will achieve the double vic­tory of cur­tail­ing As­sad’s activ­it­ies and co-opt­ing an in­creas­ingly roguish Rus­sia back, to some de­gree, in­to the in­ter­na­tion­al sys­tem. The fact is that, as Obama is dis­cov­er­ing anew, the Se­cur­ity Coun­cil re­mains the main re­pos­it­ory for in­ter­na­tion­al le­git­im­acy — which is an­oth­er way of say­ing it’s the most ef­fect­ive way of get­ting oth­er na­tions to ally with the United States. As we are find­ing out anew, the grow­ing body of U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil res­ol­u­tions is what gives Amer­ic­an for­eign-policy goals the heft of in­ter­na­tion­al law, rather than the stigma of a diktat from Wash­ing­ton.

So all eyes are on New York. Let the dip­lomacy be­gin.

What We're Following See More »
DO THEY NEED TO GET TO 15%?
Will Romney Endorse the Libertarian Ticket?
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson told CNN Thursday that Mitt Romney was considering endorsing him for president this fall." He said the two had recently spoken. Johnson's running mate, Bill Weld, agreed that they have a good chance of winning the endorsement, especially if they meet the 15% polling threshold for participating in the presidential debates.

Source:
FIRST WOMAN NOMINATED BY MAJOR PARTY
Hillary Clinton Accepts the Democratic Nomination for President
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"It is with humility, determination, and boundless confidence in America’s promise that I accept your nomination for president," said Hillary Clinton in becoming the first woman to accept a nomination for president from a major party. Clinton gave a wide-ranging address, both criticizing Donald Trump and speaking of what she has done in the past and hopes to do in the future. "He's taken the Republican party a long way, from morning in America to midnight in America," Clinton said of Trump. However, most of her speech focused instead on the work she has done and the work she hopes to do as president. "I will be a president of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents. For the struggling, the striving, the successful," she said. "For those who vote for me and for those who don't. For all Americans together."

COUNTER-CHANTS AT THE READY
Protesters Make Good on Threat to Disrupt Speech
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

Supporters of Bernie Sanders promised to walk out, turn their backs, or disrupt Hillary Clinton's speech tonight, and they made good immediately, with an outburst almost as soon as Clinton began her speech. But her supporters, armed with a handy counter-chant cheat sheet distributed by the campaign, immediately began drowning them out with chants of "Hillary, Hillary!"

SUFFOLK POLL
New Survey Shows Clinton Up 9 in Pennsylvania
18 hours ago
THE LATEST

If a new poll is to be believed, Hillary Clinton has a big lead in the all-important swing state of Pennsylvania. A new Suffolk University survey shows her ahead of Donald Trump, 50%-41%. In a four-way race, she maintains her nine-point lead, 46%-37%. "Pennsylvania has voted Democratic in the past six presidential elections, going back to Bill Clinton’s first win in 1992. Yet it is a rust belt state that could be in play, as indicated by recent general-election polling showing a close race."

Source:
THREE NIGHTS RUNNING
Democrats Beat Republicans in Convention Ratings So Far
18 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Wednesday was the third night in a row that the Democratic convention enjoyed a ratings win over the Republican convention last week. Which might have prompted a fundraising email from Donald Trump exhorting supporters not to watch. "Unless you want to be lied to, belittled, and attacked for your beliefs, don't watch Hillary's DNC speech tonight," the email read. "Instead, help Donald Trump hold her accountable, call out her lies and fight back against her nasty attacks."

Source:
×