Why the U.N. Is Suddenly Relevant

On Syria and Iran, the Security Council debate could determine Obama’s foreign-policy legacy.

President Barack Obama chairs a meeting of the United Nations Security Council at the United Nations headquarters, Thursday, Sept. 24, 2009. 
National Journal
Michael Hirsh
See more stories about...
Michael Hirsh
Sept. 23, 2013, 12:42 p.m.

When it comes to make-be­lieve for­eign policy, usu­ally noth­ing beats the an­nu­al meet­ings of the U.N. Gen­er­al As­sembly. Each Septem­ber, mem­ber na­tions of the or­gan­iz­a­tion that Pres­id­ent Obama re­cently de­cried as “para­lyzed” each get to per­form, some­times an­tic­ally, at the po­di­um. And ab­so­lutely noth­ing gets done.

That’s es­pe­cially the view in Wash­ing­ton, which more of­ten than not sees the big green build­ing on the East River as a gi­ant, musty en­cum­brance. But sud­denly the United Na­tions has be­come freshly rel­ev­ant, more so than it has been in years, cer­tainly for all of Obama’s first term. And new U.N. Am­bas­sad­or Sam­antha Power, who is largely un­tested as a dip­lo­mat, finds her­self in a very hot spot­light, one that might even make her pre­de­cessor, new Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Ad­visor Susan Rice, a touch re­gret­ful that she de­par­ted New York so soon.

In­deed, in com­ing months the ac­tions of the U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil could de­term­ine Obama’s ma­jor for­eign-policy leg­acy, even more so than his take­down of Osama bin Laden, on the long-fes­ter­ing is­sues of Ir­an’s nuc­le­ar pro­gram and Syr­ia’s civil war.

In both cases a leg­al de­pend­ency on the U.N. Charter and pre­vi­ous Se­cur­ity Coun­cil res­ol­u­tions will be cru­cial to suc­cess. It already seems clear that it was, more than any­thing, the sharp bite of U.N.-ap­proved sanc­tions on Ir­an that led to the sur­prise elec­tion of mod­er­ate Pres­id­ent Has­san Rouh­ani, who has prac­tic­ally tripped over him­self of­fer­ing to ne­go­ti­ate and whose much-an­ti­cip­ated speech Tues­day is ex­pec­ted to give clues as to his flex­ib­il­ity. It is also clear that pre­vi­ous U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil res­ol­u­tions dat­ing back to 2006 and de­mand­ing that Tehran sus­pend urani­um en­rich­ment will, more than any­thing else, put Rouh­ani’s sin­cer­ity and in­ter­na­tion­al­ism to the test. On Syr­ia — an is­sue on which Obama has looked con­sist­ently weak for two years — it is also a U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil res­ol­u­tion that will en­force the deus-ex-mach­ina deal that Mo­scow and Wash­ing­ton sud­denly already agreed upon to dis­mantle Bashar al”“As­sad’s chem­ic­al weapons.

The Rus­si­ans are res­ist­ing any men­tion of force in the new res­ol­u­tion, and Obama has pledged to keep open his earli­er threat to at­tack Syr­ia uni­lat­er­ally if it does not com­ply. But even here, says John Bellinger, the former leg­al coun­sel to the State De­part­ment, the pres­id­ent’s best ar­gu­ment rests on the U.N. charter’s “Chapter 7” guar­an­tee of the right to “col­lect­ive self-de­fense.” Bellinger, who served un­der George W. Bush, says the pre­vi­ous pres­id­ent might have won more sup­port in Ir­aq had he done something sim­il­ar. “My ad­vice to Obama would be same: Rather than rely on new and un­tested the­or­ies such as pree­mp­tion or hu­man­it­ari­an in­ter­ven­tion, em­phas­ize more a re­li­ance on the U.N. charter it­self.”

Amer­ic­an policy-makers have rarely paid much re­spect to the U.N. Gen­er­al As­sembly, an ob­strep­er­ous talk­ing shop built on the pre­tense that the vote of Zi­m­b­ab­we or Liecht­en­stein is as im­port­ant as that of the United States. U.S. pres­id­ents have also grown im­pa­tient with the Se­cur­ity Coun­cil, which Frank­lin Roosevelt set up to­ward the end of World War II as a glob­al poli­cing body. Pres­id­ents, in­clud­ing Obama, tend to see the Se­cur­ity Coun­cil as a stag­nant pool of lost great-power am­bi­tions, a pre­tend-place where a Rus­sia can puff it­self up in­to an im­age of its former self. Un­der Vladi­mir Putin, Mo­scow has of­ten done just that, veto­ing every res­ol­u­tion that might have au­thor­ized an in­ter­ven­tion in Syr­ia over the last two years.

But now Rus­sia has pub­licly com­mit­ted it­self to a U.N.-au­thor­ized dis­mant­ling of Syr­ia’s chem­ic­al weapons — and if Mo­scow fol­lows through, that will achieve the double vic­tory of cur­tail­ing As­sad’s activ­it­ies and co-opt­ing an in­creas­ingly roguish Rus­sia back, to some de­gree, in­to the in­ter­na­tion­al sys­tem. The fact is that, as Obama is dis­cov­er­ing anew, the Se­cur­ity Coun­cil re­mains the main re­pos­it­ory for in­ter­na­tion­al le­git­im­acy — which is an­oth­er way of say­ing it’s the most ef­fect­ive way of get­ting oth­er na­tions to ally with the United States. As we are find­ing out anew, the grow­ing body of U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil res­ol­u­tions is what gives Amer­ic­an for­eign-policy goals the heft of in­ter­na­tion­al law, rather than the stigma of a diktat from Wash­ing­ton.

So all eyes are on New York. Let the dip­lomacy be­gin.

What We're Following See More »
‘PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE’
Priebus Asks Party to Unite Behind Trump
1 hours ago
THE LATEST
FEELING THE MIDWESTERN BERN
Sanders Upsets Clinton in Indiana
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

Despite trailing Hillary Clinton by a significant margin, Bernie Sanders wasn't going the way of Ted Cruz tonight. The Vermont senator upset Clinton in Indiana, with MSNBC calling the race at 9pm. Sanders appears poised to win by a five- or six-point spread.

Source:
TRUMP IS PRESUMPTIVE NOMINEE
Ted Cruz Bows Out, Effectively Ceding the Contest to Trump
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

And just like that, it's over. Ted Cruz will suspend his presidential campaign after losing badly to Donald Trump in Indiana tonight. "While Cruz had always hedged when asked whether he would quit if he lost Indiana; his campaign had laid a huge bet on the state." John Kasich's campaign has pledged to carry on. “From the beginning, I’ve said that I would continue on as long as there was a viable path to victory,” said Cruz. “Tonight, I’m sorry to say it appears that path has been foreclosed."

Source:
TAKES AT LEAST 45 DELEGATES
Trump Wins Indiana, All but Seals the Nomination
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Republican establishment's last remaining hope—a contested convention this summer—may have just ended in Indiana, as Donald Trump won a decisive victory over Ted Cruz. Nothing Cruz seemed to have in his corner seemed to help—not a presumptive VP pick in Carly Fiorina, not a midwestern state where he's done well in the past, and not the state's legions of conservatives. Though Trump "won't secure the 1,237 delegates he needs to formally claim the nomination until June, his Indiana triumph makes it almost impossible to stop him. Following his decisive wins in New York and other East Coast states, the Indiana victory could put Trump within 200 delegates of the magic number he needs to clinch the nomination." Cruz, meanwhile, "now faces the agonizing choice of whether to remain in the race, with his attempt to force the party into a contested convention in tatters, or to bow out and cede the party nomination to his political nemesis." The Associated Press, which called the race at 7pm, predicts Trump will win at least 45 delegates.

Source:
LOTS OF STRINGERS
Inside the AP’s Election Operation
8 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
×