Russia: U.N. Chemical-Arms Team Poised to Re-enter Syria

Global Security Newswire Staff
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Sept. 24, 2013, 6:02 a.m.

Mo­scow said an in­ter­na­tion­al task force is poised to re-enter Syr­ia on Wed­nes­day to look fur­ther at al­leg­a­tions of chem­ic­al-weapons use in the coun­try’s civil war, Re­u­ters re­por­ted.

Rus­sia last week cri­ti­cized the ini­tial U.N. find­ings that nerve gas was used in an Aug. 21 at­tack, which have widely been seen to im­plic­ate its Dam­as­cus ally in that re­lease over a Dam­as­cus sub­urb.

Mo­scow, though, is “pleased” that the in­vest­ig­at­ors now are ex­pec­ted to probe “oth­er epis­odes” of pos­sible chem­ic­al-weapon use, Rus­si­an Deputy For­eign Min­is­ter Sergei Ry­ab­kov said on Tues­day. Rus­sia has joined Syr­i­an Pres­id­ent Bashar As­sad’s gov­ern­ment in blam­ing such strikes on rebel forces.

States parties to an in­ter­na­tion­al chem­ic­al-arms ban on Tues­day were con­sult­ing on a “draft de­cision” for dis­mant­ling Syr­ia’s chem­ic­al ar­sen­al, the Or­gan­iz­a­tion for the Pro­hib­i­tion of Chem­ic­al Weapons stated. The 41-na­tion OP­CW Ex­ec­ut­ive Coun­cil was due on Tues­day to vote on a U.S.-Rus­si­an blue­print for mon­it­or­ing and des­troy­ing the stock­pile, Re­u­ters re­por­ted.

En­voys said the U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil could act as soon as Thursday to pass a meas­ure back­ing the OP­CW text. Rus­sia, though, has con­tin­ued op­pos­ing calls by West­ern gov­ern­ments for the Se­cur­ity Coun­cil to en­dorse pos­sible pun­it­ive ac­tion for any non­com­pli­ance by Dam­as­cus.

“There can be no talk of any auto­mat­ic ap­plic­a­tion of sanc­tions, let alone the use of force,” Re­u­ters quoted Ry­ab­kov as say­ing on Tues­day.

Spe­cial­ists said elim­in­at­ing the weapons by next June — as the U.S.-Rus­si­an dis­arm­a­ment plan de­mands — would be a chal­lenge for the in­ter­na­tion­al com­munity, the New York Times re­por­ted on Monday.

“If you want to act quickly, the tech­nic­al de­cisions have to be made now, while the dip­lo­mats are work­ing,” said Lenny Siegel, head of the Cen­ter for Pub­lic En­vir­on­ment­al Over­sight. “This is dif­fi­cult stuff and it’s costly but the tech­no­lo­gies ex­ist — though most people don’t know that.”

Mean­while, the Le­banese mil­it­ant group Hezbol­lah on Monday re­jec­ted a Syr­i­an rebel as­ser­tion that it had taken cus­tody of chem­ic­al arms from Syr­ia, the Daily Star re­por­ted.

What We're Following See More »
Clinton Ahead by 13 in Early Going
5 minutes ago

"As Donald Trump captures the mantle of presumptive Republican nominee, a new poll finds he begins his general election campaign well behind Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton. The new CNN/ORC Poll, completed ahead of Trump's victory last night, found Clinton leads 54% to 41%, a 13-point edge over the New York businessman, her largest lead since last July. Clinton is also more trusted than Trump on many issues voters rank as critically important, with one big exception. By a 50% to 45% margin, voters say Trump would do a better job handling the economy than Clinton would."

Wall Street Journal, Kristol Reflect Schism on the Right
13 minutes ago

In an editorial, the Wall Street Journal sets out to relieve conservatives of the temptation to back a third-party candidate over Donald Trump. "The thought is more tempting this year than most, but it’s still hard to see how this would accomplish more than electing Hillary Clinton and muddling the message from a Trump defeat. ... The usual presidential result is that the party that splinters hands the election to the other, more united party." But in the Weekly Standard, Bill Kristol is having none of it: "Serious people, including serious conservatives, cannot acquiesce in Donald Trump as their candidate. ... Donald Trump should not be president of the United States. The Wall Street Journal cannot bring itself to say that. We can say it, we do say it, and we are proud to act accordingly."

The Trump Triumph: How’s It Playing?
59 minutes ago
  • Nate Cohn, New York Times: "There have been 10-point shifts over the general election season before, even if it’s uncommon. But there isn’t much of a precedent for huge swings in races with candidates as well known as Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton. A majority of Americans may not like her, but they say they’re scared of him."
  • Roger Simon, PJ Media: "He is particularly fortunate that his opposition, Hillary Clinton, besides still being under threat of indictment and still not having defeated Bernie Sanders (go figure), is a truly uninspiring, almost soporific, figure. ... She's not a star. Trump is. All attention will be on him in the general election. The primaries have shown us what an advantage that is. What that means for American politics may not all be good, but it's true."
  • The editors, The Washington Examiner: "At the very least, Trump owes it to the country he boasts he will 'make great again' to try to demonstrate some seriousness about the office he seeks. He owes this even to those who will never consider voting for him. He can start by swearing off grand displays of aggressive and apparently deliberate ignorance. This is not too much to ask."
Humana Will Also Exit Obamacare Exchanges
1 hours ago

Humana announced it plans to "exit certain statewide individual markets and products 'both on and off [Obamacare] exchange,' the insurer said in its financial results released Monday." The company also said price hikes may be forthcoming, "commensurate with anticipated levels of risk by state." Its individual-market enrollment was down 21% in the first quarter from a year ago.

Priebus Asks Party to Unite Behind Trump
13 hours ago