Obama Outlines Five Tenants for U.S. Foreign Policy in Middle East

President Obama addresses the United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday.
National Journal
Stephanie Gaskell, Defense One
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Stephanie Gaskell, Defense One
Sept. 24, 2013, 8:13 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama used his speech be­fore the United Na­tions Gen­er­al As­sembly on Tues­day to spell out the five ten­ants of U.S. for­eign policy in the Middle East and North Africa. Obama did not de­tail the full Middle East strategy that his crit­ics have de­man­ded more than two years in­to the Ar­ab spring. But the pres­id­ent, de­fy­ing any sense of an Amer­ic­an with­draw­al from con­flicts in the re­gion, said the ques­tion over U.S. mil­it­ary in­ter­ven­tion in­to Syr­ia il­lus­trates a deep di­vide over how the rest of the world sees U.S. en­gage­ment in the re­gion: some want­ing the U.S. avoid “med­dling” while call­ing on the U.S. to do more to solve “the re­gion’s prob­lems.”

“I know there are those who have been frus­trated by our un­will­ing­ness to use our mil­it­ary might to de­pose [Syr­i­an Pres­id­ent Bashar al] As­sad, and be­lieve that a fail­ure to do so in­dic­ates a weak­en­ing of Amer­ica’s re­solve in the re­gion. Oth­ers have sug­ges­ted that my will­ing­ness to dir­ect even lim­ited mil­it­ary strikes to de­ter the fur­ther use of chem­ic­al weapons shows that we have learned noth­ing from Ir­aq, and that Amer­ica con­tin­ues to seek con­trol over the Middle East for our own pur­poses,” Obama said, ac­cord­ing to his pre­pared re­marks. “In this way, the situ­ation in Syr­ia mir­rors a con­tra­dic­tion that has per­sisted in the re­gion for dec­ades: the United States is chas­tised for med­dling in the re­gion, and ac­cused of hav­ing a hand in all man­ner of con­spir­acy; at the same time, the United States is blamed for fail­ing to do enough to solve the re­gion’s prob­lems, and for show­ing in­dif­fer­ence to­ward suf­fer­ing Muslim pop­u­la­tions.”

“I real­ize some of this is in­ev­it­able, giv­en Amer­ica’s role in the world. But these at­ti­tudes have a prac­tic­al im­pact on the Amer­ic­an peoples’ sup­port for our in­volve­ment in the re­gion, and al­low lead­ers in the re­gion ““ and the in­ter­na­tion­al com­munity ““ to avoid ad­dress­ing dif­fi­cult prob­lems,” Obama said. “So let me take this op­por­tun­ity to out­line what has been U.S. policy to­wards the Middle East and North Africa, and what will be my policy dur­ing the re­mainder of my pres­id­ency.”

These are Obama’s five goals for U.S. for­eign policy and mil­it­ary en­gage­ment in the Middle East and North Africa:

1. “The United States of Amer­ica is pre­pared to use all ele­ments of our power, in­clud­ing mil­it­ary force, to se­cure these core in­terests in the re­gion.”

2. “We will con­front ex­tern­al ag­gres­sion against our al­lies and part­ners, as we did in the Gulf War.”

3. “We will en­sure the free flow of en­ergy from the re­gion to the world. Al­though Amer­ica is stead­ily re­du­cing our own de­pend­ence on im­por­ted oil, the world still de­pends upon the re­gion’s en­ergy sup­ply, and a severe dis­rup­tion could destabil­ize the en­tire glob­al eco­nomy.”

4. “We will dis­mantle ter­ror­ist net­works that threaten our people. Wherever pos­sible, we will build the ca­pa­city of our part­ners, re­spect the sov­er­eignty of na­tions, and work to ad­dress the root causes of ter­ror. But when its ne­ces­sary to de­fend the United States against ter­ror­ist at­tacks, we will take dir­ect ac­tion.”

5. “And fi­nally, we will not tol­er­ate the de­vel­op­ment or use of weapons of mass de­struc­tion. Just as we con­sider the use of chem­ic­al weapons in Syr­ia to be a threat to our own na­tion­al se­cur­ity, we re­ject the de­vel­op­ment of nuc­le­ar weapons that could trig­ger a nuc­le­ar arms race in the re­gion, and un­der­mine the glob­al non-pro­lif­er­a­tion re­gime.”

“Now, to say these are Amer­ica’s core in­terests is not to say these are our only in­terests. We deeply be­lieve it is in our in­terest to see a Middle East and North Africa that is peace­ful and pros­per­ous; and will con­tin­ue to pro­mote demo­cracy, hu­man rights, and open mar­kets, be­cause we be­lieve these prac­tices achieve peace and prosper­ity,” Obama said. “But I also be­lieve that we can rarely achieve these ob­ject­ives through uni­lat­er­al Amer­ic­an ac­tion ““ par­tic­u­larly with mil­it­ary ac­tion. Ir­aq shows us that demo­cracy can­not be im­posed by force. Rather, these ob­ject­ives are best achieved when we part­ner with the in­ter­na­tion­al com­munity, and with the coun­tries and people of the re­gion.”

What We're Following See More »
PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
SHUT DOWN MISLEADING FALSEHOODS
Facebook To Cut Down On Govt-Sponsored Info Campaigns
5 hours ago
BREAKING

Facebook "outlined new measures it is taking to combat what it calls 'information operations' that go well beyond the phenomenon known as fake news" on Thursday. Facebook acknowledged that there are governments using its platform as a tool to launch propaganda information campaigns and "manipulate public opinion in other countries. ... Facebook suspended 30,000 accounts in France ahead of last Sunday’s first-round presidential election."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
9 hours ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
IN 2014
Pentagon Warned Flynn Not To Accept Foreign Payments
11 hours ago
BREAKING
WOULD PUSH DEADLINE TO MAY 5
One-Week Spending Bill On The Table
11 hours ago
BREAKING

Members of Congress are eyeing a one-week spending bill which would keep the government open past the Friday night deadline, giving lawmakers an extra week to iron out a long-term deal to fund the government. Without any action, the government would run out of funding starting at midnight Saturday. “I am optimistic that a final funding package will be completed soon," said Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen, R-N.J., chairman of the House Appropriations Committee.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login