Iran: We Are Not a Threat

The U.S. disagrees, however, which complicates future negotiations between the two nations.

Hasan Rouhani, President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, addresses the 68th United Nations General Assembly at UN headquarters, Tuesday, Sept. 24, 2013.
National Journal
Marina Koren
Sept. 24, 2013, 2:39 p.m.

Ir­a­ni­an Pres­id­ent Has­san Rouh­ani said Tues­day he listened care­fully to Pres­id­ent Obama’s speech to the United Na­tions Gen­er­al As­sembly. He must have heard then, the pres­id­ent say that U.S. dip­lo­mat­ic ef­forts will soon be­come fo­cused on “Ir­an’s pur­suit of nuc­le­ar weapons.”

In his own speech, Rouh­ani re­it­er­ated his re­cent state­ments about his gov­ern­ment’s nuc­le­ar pro­gram. Spe­cific­ally, that Tehran doesn’t have any nuc­le­ar weapons, which “have no place in Ir­an’s se­cur­ity and de­fense doc­trine and con­tra­dict our fun­da­ment­al and eth­ic­al con­vic­tions.” He ad­ded, as trans­lated by an in­ter­pret­er. “Ir­an poses ab­so­lutely no threat to the world or the re­gion.”

Rouh­ani called threats posed by Ir­an “ima­gin­ary,” say­ing, “Those who harp on the so-called threat of Ir­an are either a threat against in­ter­na­tion­al peace and se­cur­ity them­selves.” Ir­an, he said, is the “an­chor of sta­bil­ity” in an un­stable re­gion.

While Obama and Rouh­ani can’t agree on the state of Ir­an’s nuc­le­ar pro­gram, they ap­pear to have found com­mon ground about what’s next: “mu­tu­al re­spect” in fu­ture talks. Such ne­go­ti­ations would end a 34-year freeze on U.S.-Ir­an dip­lo­mat­ic re­la­tions.

For Rouh­ani, though, it’s not time for that just yet. The Ir­a­ni­an pres­id­ent de­clined to meet with Obama on the side­lines of Tues­day’s events, ac­cord­ing to pool re­ports, ex­plain­ing that such an en­counter is “too com­plic­ated” at this time.

Still, Rouh­ani’s goal is “to re­move any and all reas­on­able con­cerns about Ir­an’s peace­ful nuc­le­ar pro­gram.” The White House’s in­stance that Ir­an’s nuc­le­ar pro­gram is any­thing but peace­ful, however, com­plic­ates that.

What We're Following See More »
Plurality of Trump Voters Just Want to Stop Clinton
20 minutes ago

"Nearly half of American voters who support either Democrat Hillary Clinton or Republican Donald Trump for the White House said they will mainly be trying to block the other side from winning, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released Thursday." When Trump supporters were asked to give their primary reason for supporting him, 47% said to block Clinton from winning. In almost a mirror image, 46% of Clinton supporters said they were primarily out to thwart Trump.

Many GOPers Still Think Trump Can Be Brought to Heel
36 minutes ago
Trump Finance Guru Has History of Contributing to Dems
2 hours ago

"Like Donald Trump himself, the Trump campaign’s new national finance chairman has a long history of contributing to Democrats—including Hillary Clinton. Private investor Steven Mnuchin, Trump’s new campaign fundraising guru, has contributed more than $120,000" to candidates since 1995, about half of which has gone to Democrats.

Paul Ryan Can’t Get Behind Trump
18 hours ago

Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."

Trump Roadmapped His Candidacy in 2000
20 hours ago

The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"