North Korea’s Nuclear Work Is Beyond Sanctions’ Ability to Constrain: Experts

Global Security Newswire Staff
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Sept. 25, 2013, 7:02 a.m.

North Korea has ad­vanced its in­di­gen­ous atom­ic cap­ab­il­it­ies so much that it is not real­ist­ic to ex­pect in­ter­na­tion­al sanc­tions and ex­port con­trols to con­strain its pro­gress in de­vel­op­ing a nuc­le­ar weapon, Agence France-Presse re­por­ted on Wed­nes­day, cit­ing the find­ings of ex­perts.

Ana­lysts speak­ing at a Seoul for­um or­gan­ized by the As­an In­sti­tute were of mixed views on just how far the North had pro­gressed to­ward ac­quir­ing a cred­ible nuc­le­ar weapon. Still, they agreed it was past time for the in­ter­na­tion­al com­munity to de­vel­op a new plan of ac­tion for deal­ing with the isol­ated na­tion’s atom­ic work.

North Korea is “not at the start of this pro­cess any­more,” As­an In­sti­tute Sci­ence and Tech­no­logy Policy Cen­ter Dir­ect­or Park Jiyoung said. “They’ve been at it a long time.”

A new ana­lys­is by ex­perts Joshua Pol­lack and Scott Kemp this week con­cluded Py­ongy­ang had de­veloped the abil­ity to do­mest­ic­ally pro­duce urani­um cent­ri­fuges. North Korea has one known urani­um en­rich­ment plant at the Yongby­on nuc­le­ar com­plex. Urani­um en­rich­ment plants are less en­ergy in­tens­ive than plutoni­um-pro­du­cing re­act­ors, so urani­um sites are more dif­fi­cult to de­tect via satel­lite. That means there could be urani­um plants es­tab­lished else­where that the world does not know about.

Be­cause of the dif­fi­culty in con­firm­ing the ex­act scope of North Korea’s urani­um-en­rich­ment pro­gram and wheth­er it is really hon­or­ing po­ten­tial fu­ture aid-for-de­nuc­lear­iz­a­tion agree­ments, the world should con­cen­trate on con­vin­cing Py­ongy­ang not to carry out a fourth atom­ic test, Pol­lack told con­fer­ence par­ti­cipants.

Li Bin, a nuc­le­ar re­search­er at the Carne­gie En­dow­ment for In­ter­na­tion­al Peace, noted that in the most re­cent Feb­ru­ary test, “they could not fin­ish the task of mini­atur­iz­a­tion … but if they have a chance for more nuc­le­ar tests, maybe one more, they would be able to have small and more re­li­able device for their mis­sile,” the Yon­hap News Agency re­por­ted.

North Korea is thought to be de­vel­op­ing long-range bal­list­ic mis­siles, and achieved its first suc­cess­ful three-stage rock­et launch in Decem­ber. A par­tic­u­larly dif­fi­cult ques­tion to an­swer is how far the Kim Jong Un re­gime has pro­gressed in pro­du­cing a war­head small enough to mount on an ICBM.

Glob­al con­cerns about the North’s pro­gress to­ward ac­quir­ing a cred­ible nuc­le­ar-armed mis­sile reached a cres­cendo point this spring after Py­ongy­ang threatened re­peatedly to carry out nuc­le­ar strikes on South Korea and the United States and de­ployed mis­sile launch­ers on its coast. The United States re­spon­ded by an­noun­cing it would field more long-range in­ter­cept­ors in Alaska and by post­ing ad­di­tion­al an­ti­mis­sile sys­tems on Guam.

All of that earli­er worry, though, was not in evid­ence when U.S. Pres­id­ent Obama ad­dressed the U.N. Gen­er­al As­sembly on Tues­day. In a speech that fo­cused heav­ily on pro­spects for dip­lomacy with Ir­an and the Syr­i­an chem­ic­al-weapons crisis, the pres­id­ent did not men­tion North Korea and its con­tin­ued nuc­le­ar weapons pro­gress once, Yon­hap re­por­ted.

What We're Following See More »
1.5 MILLION MORE TUNED IN FOR TRUMP
More People Watched Trump’s Acceptance Speech
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

Hillary Clinton hopes that television ratings for the candidates' acceptance speeches at their respective conventions aren't foreshadowing of similar results at the polls in November. Preliminary results from the networks and cable channels show that 34.9 million people tuned in for Donald Trump's acceptance speech while 33.3 million watched Clinton accept the Democratic nomination. However, it is still possible that the numbers are closer than these ratings suggest: the numbers don't include ratings from PBS or CSPAN, which tend to attract more Democratic viewers.

Source:
×