White House insiders fear that Iranian President Hassan Rouhani turned down a brief meeting proposed for Tuesday with President Obama to avoid a domestic political backlash, possibly signaling that the relatively moderate leader lacks adequate authority in Tehran to settle an international standoff over its suspected nuclear-arms ambitions, the Wall Street Journal reported.
Washington officials on Tuesday conferred at a “working level” with Iranian counterparts to orchestrate a brief encounter between the leaders at the U.N. General Assembly, but “it became clear that that was too complicated for [the Iranians] at this time,” a high-level Obama insider told reporters on Tuesday.
Rouhani gave a speech reaffirming his country’s determination to continue enriching uranium for peaceful use, even though Washington and other governments worry Tehran could harness the process to generate bomb fuel. Earlier on Tuesday, Obama urged Tehran to abide by U.N. Security Council demands for Iran to fully suspend its uranium enrichment program.
Obama insiders told the Journal that Rouhani’s address did not catch them off guard. “Iran has a baseline set of positions they have taken for a long time,” one high-level source said. “We would not expect them to shift their negotiations publicly.”
Meanwhile, the Iranian Foreign Ministry on Tuesday called for a “time limit” on any new nuclear discussions with China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States. Tehran would stress its “right of enrichment on Iranian territory” in any new meeting, spokeswoman Marziyeh Afkham added.
Iran’s top diplomat and delegates from the six negotiating governments are expected on Thursday to consider the “trend” of prior meetings, the spokeswoman said, adding that “an agreement has been struck to continue the talks in mid-October in Geneva.”
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.