How Obamacare Affects Young, Healthy Men: Jimmy Tomczak

Sophie Novack
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Sophie Novack
Sept. 26, 2013, 4:15 p.m.

Jimmy Tom­czak, 25, be­lieves there’s very little one needs to get out­side and live. After gradu­at­ing from the Uni­versity of Michigan, he star­ted his own com­pany based on this idea, cre­at­ing eco-friendly san­dals out of re­cycled bill­board vinyl. He re­cently spent a week at Burn­ing Man; he travels of­ten and says he needs only a laptop and cell phone to make money.

“The place I keep my stuff,” he says, is a du­plex in De­troit, in the apart­ment up­stairs from his mom and 13-year-old sis­ter, who are both on his moth­er’s em­ploy­ee health in­sur­ance plan. The Af­ford­able Care Act has al­lowed Tom­czak to get cov­er­age on that plan (it re­quires just a $20 co-pay for of­fice vis­its and cov­ers most pre­scrip­tions) so far, but when he turns 26 in April, he’ll be on his own. So he’ll shop on the ACA-cre­ated ex­changes with the help of a tax sub­sidy to cov­er the plan he chooses.

Jimmy’s age and good health might tempt him to pay the small pen­alty and forgo cov­er­age, but while some friends have chosen this op­tion, Jimmy wants the safety net. “The best cov­er­age is a hol­ist­ic ap­proach to sleep, eat­ing, ex­er­cise, main­tain­ing good re­la­tion­ships, and hav­ing a pos­it­ive im­pact,” he says. “But when everything else is chan­ging, and I’m in a dif­fer­ent city each day, I need to make sure [my health] is a sure thing.”¦ You’ve heard that young people think they’re in­vin­cible, but as an en­tre­pren­eur I take risks, and I would rather take big risks in busi­ness and build­ing my com­pany than with my health.”

Tom­czak’s in­come var­ies de­pend­ing on his busi­ness, which makes it dif­fi­cult to pre­dict what he’ll pay in premi­ums un­der the new law. His in­come range, which he de­clined to give on the re­cord, is near the cutoff for sub­sidy eli­gib­il­ity, so his cov­er­age could vary sig­ni­fic­antly with a re­l­at­ively small dif­fer­ence in earn­ings. If he earns more, he will need to pay around 5 per­cent of his an­nu­al in­come — or 33 per­cent of the over­all premi­um — for sil­ver-plan cov­er­age, with the re­mainder covered by a gov­ern­ment sub­sidy.

Be­cause Michigan op­ted in­to the Medi­caid ex­pan­sion, if Tom­czak’s in­come falls, he’ll be eli­gible for Medi­caid cov­er­age. Had the state op­ted out, his in­come would have been too high for ex­ist­ing Medi­caid and too low to qual­i­fy for sub­sidies; like sev­er­al mil­lion Amer­ic­ans in states that are not ex­pand­ing their Medi­caid pro­grams, he would be left without af­ford­able op­tions. In an­oth­er state, a lower in­come would have made his premi­um three times high­er than if he made a few thou­sand dol­lars more, be­cause he would have to pay 100 per­cent of the cost.

Al­though Tom­czak in­tends to pur­chase in­sur­ance on the ex­changes, he hasn’t re­searched his op­tions ex­tens­ively be­cause he’ll be on his mom’s plan un­til April. “Six months seems like an etern­ity in the busi­ness life cycle,” he says. “I can wait five months and be more edu­cated” — al­though the stand­ard en­roll­ment peri­od for 2014 will end March 31.

While a ma­jor­ity of young people are en­thu­si­ast­ic about the law, con­fu­sion is also com­mon. “They’re not do­ing a great job [mar­ket­ing the ACA],” Tom­czak says. “You’ll have two equally qual­i­fied ex­perts say totally dif­fer­ent things.” He says he’s de­term­ined to study his op­tions and make the best de­cision pos­sible. “An en­tre­pren­eur can only bend the rules so much.”

What We're Following See More »
House Freedom Caucus Endorses Obamacare Replacement
36 minutes ago

After more than a month of back and forth, a failed bill, and GOP embarrassment, the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus has announced that it will support the Obamacare replacement legislation in its most recent iteration. Rep. Mark Meadows, the chairman of the caucus, said the roughly 30 members of the caucus view this compromise as the best option short of a full repeal. A recent amendment, authored by Meadows and Rep. Tom McArthur, co-chair of the more moderate Tuesday Group, would allow states to apply for waivers exempting them from provisions forbidding insurers from charging higher prices to those with pre-existing conditions if the state set up a high-risk pool. The plan's passage in the House is not a done deal though, as a number of moderate lawmakers have resisted supporting the amendment.

White House Working On Order To Leave NATO
1 hours ago
U.S. Navy Vessel Fired Flare at Iranian Boat on Monday
2 hours ago

"A U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer fired a warning flare toward an Iranian Revolutionary Guard vessel coming near it in the Persian Gulf. The incident happened Monday as the vessel closed to within 1,000 meters of the USS Mahan, "despite the destroyer trying to turn away from it." After attempting to contact the Iranian vessel and sounding its whistle, it deployed the flare. After that, the ship had had enough and turned away.

White House Attacks Judge Who Suspended Executive Order
2 hours ago

U.S. District Judge William Orrick Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing part of an executive order calling for the end of federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities. The decision was followed by a scathing rebuke from the White House, a precedent-breaking activity which with this White House has had no qualms. A White House statement called the decision an "egregious overreach by a single, unelected district judge." The statement was followed by an inaccurate Wednesday morning tweetstorm from Trump, which railed against the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While Judge Orrick's district falls within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, Orrick himself does not serve on the Ninth Circuit.

House GOP Circulates Amendment on Preexisting Conditions
6 hours ago

"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.