House Republicans Ready to Retreat, Easing Shutdown Fears

Conservatives appear poised to support Boehner’s strategy of using the debt ceiling, not the CR, to fight Obamacare.

Speaker of the House John Boehner, R-Ohio, smiles as he leaves a news conference as Congress prepares to shut down until after the elections in November, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Friday, Sept. 21, 2012. 
National Journal
Tim Alberta
Sept. 25, 2013, 6:45 p.m.

Con­ser­vat­ive Re­pub­lic­ans in the House ap­pear ready to back off their de­mands that the short-term fund­ing res­ol­u­tion Con­gress must pass to avoid a gov­ern­ment shut­down also de­fund or delay Obama­care.

In a shift that could spare John Boehner a dam­aging up­ris­ing from his ma­jor­ity’s right wing, con­ser­vat­ives have be­gun to ac­know­ledge their lack of lever­age in the fund­ing de­bate and are now co­ales­cing around the House speak­er’s pre­ferred strategy of for­cing the White House to ac­cept health-law changes by hold­ing the debt ceil­ing host­age.

Still, Re­pub­lic­ans are search­ing for some con­ces­sions that might al­low them to es­cape the de­bate over the con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion with a scaled-down policy vic­tory.

In a private con­fer­ence call Tues­day night, talk among con­ser­vat­ives centered on us­ing the fund­ing bill to “chip away” at Obama­care rather than de­fund it en­tirely, ac­cord­ing to one seni­or GOP aide fa­mil­i­ar with the con­ver­sa­tion. “People were very cau­tious,” the aide said, not­ing the change in tone and lan­guage. “There was not an enorm­ous amount of fight from mem­bers.”

In­deed, ac­cord­ing to sev­er­al law­makers and GOP aides fa­mil­i­ar with House Re­pub­lic­ans’ re­cent strategy ses­sions, law­makers have ab­ruptly shif­ted from swinging for the fences to play­ing small ball ““ drop­ping de­mands that the bill de­fund the pro­gram and in­stead call­ing for con­ser­vat­ive policy riders to be pas­ted onto the Sen­ate CR.

“We’re closer to the dead­line, so folks start think­ing dif­fer­ently as our op­tions nar­row,” ex­plained Rep. Erik Paulsen of Min­nesota.

Boehner will out­line those re­main­ing op­tions on Thursday morn­ing, when House Re­pub­lic­ans gath­er to dis­cuss how they’ll re­spond when the Sen­ate, as ex­pec­ted, re­turns the spend­ing bill to the House with Obama­care fund­ing in­tact.

One law­maker de­scribed Boehner’s ap­proach as a “one-two punch” to de­feat the Af­ford­able Care Act.

Ac­cord­ing to GOP law­makers and aides, it in­volves adding a pack­age of con­ser­vat­ive policy pro­vi­sions to the con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion the Sen­ate ap­proves. The two like­li­est pro­vi­sions are meas­ures that re­peal the med­ic­al device tax (which en­joys some bi­par­tis­an sup­port and would rep­res­ent a sub­stant­ive blow to the law it­self) and ban sub­sidies un­der the health law for fed­er­al law­makers and their staff mem­bers (which law­makers think would earn me­dia at­ten­tion but amount to little more than a sym­bol­ic polit­ic­al vic­tory.)

While a small group of con­ser­vat­ives wants to send back to the Sen­ate a new CR that delays Obama­care for a year, law­makers know there’s no time for that if they want to avoid a shut­down. Not­ably, there seems to be no dis­cus­sion of re-in­sert­ing the ori­gin­al lan­guage to de­fund Obama­care and send­ing back to the Sen­ate the same CR it will have just re­jec­ted ““ an ap­proach some House Re­pub­lic­ans were agit­at­ing for as re­cently as last week.

The second step in Boehner’s plan in­volves the debt-ceil­ing ““ spe­cific­ally, Re­pub­lic­ans de­mand­ing a one-year delay in the im­ple­ment­a­tion of Obama­care in ex­change for ex­tend­ing the na­tion’s bor­row­ing lim­it be­fore the Treas­ury De­part­ment runs out of money to pay the coun­try’s bills on Oct. 17.

Sev­er­al in­flu­en­tial con­ser­vat­ives, led by Rep. Tom Price of Geor­gia, have been en­cour­aging their House col­leagues to ap­proach the CR and debt-ceil­ing epis­odes as two fronts in the same war against Obama­care. This would af­ford House Re­pub­lic­ans some flex­ib­il­ity to say they are at­tack­ing Obama­care from sev­er­al dif­fer­ent angles, they ar­gue, while also help­ing to save face after the Sen­ate dis­poses of their pro­pos­al to de­fund the health care law.

If Boehner can con­vince rank-and-file con­ser­vat­ives that a one-year delay of Obama­care will be the center­piece of their debt-ceil­ing plan ““ and show them le­gis­lat­ive text on Thursday ““ House aides ex­pect a ma­jor­ity of mem­bers to ac­cept de­feat on their de­fund­ing ef­fort and work quickly to­ward se­cur­ing some smal­ler, health care-re­lated con­ces­sions on the CR.

The debt-ceil­ing vote in the House is ex­pec­ted as soon as Fri­day, stra­tegic­ally timed to give Re­pub­lic­ans a vote in fa­vor of a one-year Obama­care delay be­fore vot­ing on whatever re­vised CR pro­pos­al the House pur­sues.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4469) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
10 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×