More than six in 10 Americans say Congress should require spending cuts before raising the debt ceiling, even if that puts the nation at risk of default, according to a Bloomberg poll released Thursday.
President Obama and congressional Democrats are demanding a debt-ceiling increase with no conditions, with the president repeatedly admonishing Congress to “pay the bills that they’ve already racked up.” The business community — wary of the economic consequences of default — is calling on Congress to raise the limit as well.
But those arguments appear to have failed to win over a majority of the public thus far, with only 28 percent of respondents telling Bloomberg they favor an unconditional increase. Eleven percent said they were unsure.
Raising the debt ceiling does not authorize any new congressional spending. Instead, it authorizes the Treasury Department to borrow more to pay the country’s existing obligations.
By withholding an increase, however, Republicans see a window to force spending cuts, a maneuver they successfully employed in 2011, when they agreed to raise the debt ceiling only after Democrats agreed to put in place a spending-reduction plan that eventually produced the current across-the-board discretionary spending cuts known as the sequester.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office says the deficit is falling sharply when measured as a percentage of the country’s total economic output, but the majority of Americans see it differently. Fifty-nine percent of poll respondents said the deficit is growing, 26 percent said it was holding steady, and only 10 percent said it is getting smaller.
Bloomberg’s poll was done via interviews of 1,000 U.S. adults conducted between Sept. 20 and Sept. 23.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."