Drama Intensifies Over Government Funding and Debt Ceiling on Both Sides of Capitol

Speaker of the House John Boehner, R-Ohio, center, and GOP leaders, speak to reporters after a closed-door strategy session at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, Sept. 26, 2013. Pressure is building on fractious Republicans over legislation to prevent a partial government shutdown, as the Democratic-led Senate is expected to strip a tea party-backed plan to defund  the Affordable Care Act, popularly known as "Obamacare," from their bill. From left to right are House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., Speaker of the House John Boehner, R-Ohio, House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., and Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich., chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
National Journal
Michael Catalin and Billy House
Add to Briefcase
Michael Catalin Billy House
Sept. 26, 2013, 5:23 p.m.

A bicam­er­al spar­ring match between Demo­crat­ic and Re­pub­lic­an lead­ers — as well as with­in the GOP con­fer­ences in both cham­bers — raged on Thursday over fund­ing the gov­ern­ment and pay­ing its debts, with little pro­spect of a res­ol­u­tion be­fore the week­end.

House Speak­er John Boehner, R-Ohio, and his lieu­ten­ants sought to shift the fo­cus of their fisc­al fights with Sen­ate Demo­crats to a battle over rais­ing the lim­it on the na­tion’s bor­row­ing au­thor­ity. But their strategy ran in­to op­pos­i­tion from many of their own in the House Re­pub­lic­an con­fer­ence.

Ob­jec­tions, con­cerns, and re­fus­als to com­mit from 20 to 30 con­ser­vat­ives ul­ti­mately squashed plans in the House to pro­ceed by Fri­day or Sat­urday to a vote on the lead­er­ship-craf­ted debt-ceil­ing pack­age. Lead­er­ship aides on Thursday night de­scribed the situ­ation as “flu­id” and said con­ver­sa­tions with mem­bers were con­tinu­ing.

Earli­er Thursday, Boehner and oth­er GOP lead­ers had emerged from a morn­ing meet­ing with fel­low House Re­pub­lic­ans in­sist­ing they had not yet giv­en up the ef­fort to in­clude lan­guage to de­fund Obama­care in the on­go­ing ne­go­ti­ations with the Sen­ate over a stop­gap spend­ing bill.

The Sen­ate is ex­pec­ted to strip out that lan­guage, and re­turn the meas­ure to the House — a dance that will con­tin­ue through this week­end as the dead­line nears for a con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion to keep gov­ern­ment fun­ded past Tues­day.

The up­per cham­ber plans to move for­ward on the CR on Fri­day with a series of four votes, in­clud­ing one on clo­ture and one on de­let­ing the House lan­guage to de­fund Obama­care.

In the House, Re­pub­lic­ans said that dur­ing a closed-door meet­ing of the con­fer­ence, Boehner and oth­er lead­ers sought to move to­ward strategy on the debt ceil­ing, which will be reached in mid-Oc­to­ber. That left mem­bers di­vided, with some ques­tion­ing why the House would now act on a debt-ceil­ing vote be­fore deal­ing with the re­vi­sions the Sen­ate sends back in the House-passed CR. Oth­ers also com­plained about what they said were glar­ing omis­sions in key in­form­a­tion presen­ted to them about the debt-ceil­ing pack­age it­self.

“We’re still try­ing to win on the CR,” said Rep. Tim Huel­skamp, R-Kan. “So a lot of folks are won­der­ing: Why do this when we’re sit­ting here try­ing to de­cide what our next move might be on that?”

The House Rules Com­mit­tee on Thursday did pass a rule al­low­ing a debt-ceil­ing pack­age to be brought up the same day it is in­tro­duced. The same rule also was ex­ten­ded to a re­vised CR from the Sen­ate, and the com­mit­tee agreed that the cur­rent two-part ver­sion of the farm bill could be merged in the House, al­low­ing a con­fer­ence to be­gin with the Sen­ate, which passed its own farm bill in June.

Huel­skamp and oth­er House Re­pub­lic­ans said the lead­ers have not yet provided a “score” of their pro­posed debt-ceil­ing bill’s spend­ing cuts and sav­ings.

The bill, as of Thursday, would not call for a spe­cif­ic dol­lar in­crease in bor­row­ing au­thor­ity, but in­stead would sus­pend the ceil­ing through next year. Huel­skamp and oth­ers said pro­jec­tions of next year’s na­tion­al debt, com­bined with the amount run up in the fi­nal three months of this year, would put the ad­ded bor­row­ing needs at some­where between $900 bil­lion and $1 tril­lion.

At the same time, Huel­skamp said any off­sets or cuts in the pro­pos­al would not even ap­proach those num­bers. “I don’t see hardly any cuts in there,” he said.

Con­ser­vat­ives, in what has be­come some­what pom­pously known as the “Wil­li­ams­burg Ac­cord,” had agreed in Janu­ary at a re­treat in Vir­gin­ia to post­pone the debt-ceil­ing de­bate while fisc­al policies were en­acted to put the fed­er­al budget on the path to 10-year bal­ance. Huel­skamp said he’s among those who can’t de­term­ine wheth­er this debt-ceil­ing pack­age com­plies with that prom­ise, but that it doesn’t ap­pear to do so.

Huel­skamp and oth­ers also said the pack­age ap­pears to vi­ol­ate Boehner’s own rule that “dol­lar-for-dol­lar” cuts or re­forms be in­cluded in any debt-ceil­ing in­crease.

In­stead, Huel­skamp said, the fo­cus seems to be more on ways to at­tract enough GOP votes by at­tach­ing a long list of un­re­lated items to the bill — such as ramped-up ap­prov­al of the Key­stone XL oil pipeline, in­creased off­shore oil and gas pro­duc­tion, re­peal of a med­ic­al-device tax, and an in­crease in means test­ing for Medi­care.

In the Sen­ate, Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, D-Nev., has tele­graphed all week that he would strip lan­guage from the House CR that would de­fund Obama­care, des­pite in­dic­a­tions that House Re­pub­lic­ans will bounce the le­gis­la­tion back to the Sen­ate with the pro­vi­sion re­stored.

Re­id tried un­suc­cess­fully to hold votes on Thursday night, but Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Mike Lee of Utah, along­side Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, ob­jec­ted to Re­id’s un­an­im­ous-con­sent re­quest be­cause they wanted a vote on Fri­day.

The scene crackled with drama, as Sen. Bob Cork­er, R-Tenn., said the reas­on Cruz and Lee wanted a Fri­day vote was be­cause they had no­ti­fied out­side groups it would be then. Lee said it was be­cause the pub­lic had been ex­pect­ing a Fri­day or Sat­urday vote. Cork­er sug­ges­ted it was more im­port­ant to send the bill back to the House so Re­pub­lic­ans there would have time to add what they wanted back in­to the bill.

At one point dur­ing the de­bate, sen­at­ors were ad­mon­ished that they must ad­dress each oth­er in the third per­son.

“I’m sorry we’re go­ing to have to vote to­mor­row and not today,” Re­id said af­ter­ward.

The CR that comes out of the Sen­ate and goes back to the House ap­pears to be Re­id’s fi­nal of­fer. “We’re go­ing to have a clean CR,” he said. “That’s what we’re go­ing to vote for. We’re not go­ing to play any of their games.”

The im­plic­a­tion is that the pub­lic would blame the GOP for a shut­down, Demo­crats hope. To il­lus­trate the point, Sen­ate Demo­crats ap­peared at a news con­fer­ence with a large tele­vi­sion screen show­ing a count­down to­ward a gov­ern­ment shut­down, which would be­gin Tues­day, the start of the new fisc­al year.

“Over in the House, the host­age-takers on the Far Right won out, and the Re­pub­lic­an lead­er­ship caved and handed them the keys and let them run the show,” said Sen. Chuck Schu­mer, D-N.Y., be­fore sig­nal­ing to the screen. “As a res­ult, the House pushed us to four days away — four days, 11 hours, 33 minutes, and sev­en seconds un­til Re­pub­lic­ans shut down the gov­ern­ment.”

Most Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans say they do not want a shut­down and do want to fund the gov­ern­ment — minus Obama­care.

Cork­er tried to down­play the di­vi­sion, sug­gest­ing it was only Lee and Cruz slow­ing the Sen­ate down on this is­sue.

“It’s not the en­tire Re­pub­lic­an side,” Cork­er said. “I think most Re­pub­lic­ans — I know all Re­pub­lic­ans oth­er than two — would ac­tu­ally like to give the House the op­por­tun­ity to re­spond in an ap­pro­pri­ate way.”

Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell, R-Ky., has also said he wants the Sen­ate to fin­ish its busi­ness as soon as pos­sible so the House could act.

As for how the Sen­ate will dis­patch with the debt ceil­ing, Re­id again said Demo­crats would not ne­go­ti­ate. Asked wheth­er Re­pub­lic­ans offered to turn off se­quest­ra­tion if Demo­crats would ne­go­ti­ate on the debt ceil­ing, Re­id answered de­cis­ively: No.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
23 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
1 days ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
1 days ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×