Why Delaying Obamacare Could Ultimately Do As Much Damage as Defunding

The GOP-backed one-year delay sounds benign but it would create the kind of chaos that could permanently harm the health insurance program.

Maygan Rollins, 22, a field organizer with Enroll America, holds a clipboard with pamplets while canvassing at a bus stop, Wednesday, Sept. 25, 2013, in Miami. Enroll America is a private, non-profit organization running a grassroots campaign to encourage people to sign up for health care offered by the Affordable Care Act. In less than a week Florida residents can start enrolling for health coverage under the Affordable Care Act. 
National Journal
Jill Lawrence
See more stories about...
Jill Lawrence
Sept. 27, 2013, 5:07 a.m.

The Re­pub­lic­an plan to delay core as­pects of the Af­ford­able Care Act doesn’t sound as dra­mat­ic as tak­ing away its fund­ing, but it could ul­ti­mately do just as much to crush the con­tro­ver­sial law.

The latest wrinkle in the GOP’s stop-Obama­care strategy is a one-year “delay of everything,” says Brendan Buck, spokes­man for House Speak­er John Boehner. And that does mean everything ““ the new in­sur­ance mar­ket­places, the sub­sidies, the taxes, and in­di­vidu­al man­date that re­quires people to have in­sur­ance or pay a fine.

It would be hard to over­state the im­port­ance of the year ahead for both sides in the health ar­gu­ment. Re­pub­lic­ans are seek­ing an­oth­er year to stoke doubts about the health law, which is already un­pop­u­lar, and to take their re­peal plat­form in­to the 2014 midterms. If they win con­trol of the Sen­ate, they could claim a man­date to kill it.

Pres­id­ent Obama and Demo­crats, by con­trast, have been wait­ing im­pa­tiently for the open­ing of the ex­changes that are go­ing on­line Oct. 1 and are the first chance many con­sumers will have to ex­per­i­ence the law. Obama is count­ing on that firsthand con­tact to change views. As he put it Thursday, after de­scrib­ing the new sys­tem, people don’t have to take his word for it: “Go on the web­site. See for your­self what the prices are. See for your­self what the choices are. Then make up your own mind. That’s all I’m ask­ing.”

Demo­crats like to com­pare Obama­care to the Medi­care pre­scrip­tion drug pro­gram and its tra­ject­ory from res­ist­ance to ac­cept­ance. A month after it took ef­fect in Janu­ary 2006, only 23 per­cent of seni­ors in a Kais­er Fam­ily Found­a­tion poll had a fa­vor­able im­pres­sion while 45 per­cent viewed it un­fa­vor­ably. By Novem­ber 2006, that had moved to 42 per­cent fa­vor­able, 34 per­cent un­fa­vor­able. By the end of 2012, 32 mil­lion people ““ 63 per­cent of those eli­gible ““ were en­rolled in the drug plan.

There is rampant am­bi­val­ence in today’s polls. More than half the coun­try op­poses the law, while few­er than four in 10 fa­vor it. But 56 per­cent in a New York Times/CBS News poll say Con­gress should up­hold the ACA and make it work as well as pos­sible. And a new United Tech­no­lo­gies/Na­tion­al Journ­al Con­gres­sion­al Con­nec­tion poll finds a near-even split: 49 per­cent say Con­gress should keep the pro­gram, 44 per­cent say re­peal.

If the ex­changes did open but the in­di­vidu­al man­date was post­poned, ex­perts say those likely to skip buy­ing in­sur­ance are the young and the healthy ““ just the people most needed to broaden the risk pool and keep in­sur­ance rates low. Sur­ging rates would ant­ag­on­ize the pub­lic. So would the ab­sence of in­come-based sub­sidies. And if the ex­changes did not open at all, after lay­ing ground­work for big changes for the last three years, in­surers and con­sumers would be left scram­bling.

“You could think about an or­derly trans­ition back, but just stop­ping it would be chaot­ic,” says Gary Clax­ton, dir­ect­or of the Health Care Mar­ket­place Pro­ject at the Kais­er Fam­ily Found­a­tion. Among his ques­tions: Would the com­pan­ies have to re­sume un­der­writ­ing, charge high­er rates to sick people, and deny cov­er­age to some? And with many high-risk pools gone in pre­par­a­tion for the big shift, where would those people get in­sur­ance? He also notes that if in­surers lost money as a res­ult of the sud­den full stop, the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment would be on the hook to make up much of the loss, as it was the case with the Medi­care drug pro­gram.

From a polit­ic­al se­mantics stand­point, says Robert Blendon, a health policy ex­pert at Har­vard, “de­fund­ing sounds aw­ful. It sounds like you’re tak­ing money away from sick people.” A one-year delay seems more be­nign, he says, but “could have a very neg­at­ive long-term ef­fect on the vi­ab­il­ity of the law.” That makes de­fund and delay a win-win for Re­pub­lic­ans, and a test of back­bone for Demo­crats.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4471) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×