Why Delaying Obamacare Could Ultimately Do As Much Damage as Defunding

The GOP-backed one-year delay sounds benign but it would create the kind of chaos that could permanently harm the health insurance program.

Maygan Rollins, 22, a field organizer with Enroll America, holds a clipboard with pamplets while canvassing at a bus stop, Wednesday, Sept. 25, 2013, in Miami. Enroll America is a private, non-profit organization running a grassroots campaign to encourage people to sign up for health care offered by the Affordable Care Act. In less than a week Florida residents can start enrolling for health coverage under the Affordable Care Act. 
National Journal
Jill Lawrence
See more stories about...
Jill Lawrence
Sept. 27, 2013, 5:07 a.m.

The Re­pub­lic­an plan to delay core as­pects of the Af­ford­able Care Act doesn’t sound as dra­mat­ic as tak­ing away its fund­ing, but it could ul­ti­mately do just as much to crush the con­tro­ver­sial law.

The latest wrinkle in the GOP’s stop-Obama­care strategy is a one-year “delay of everything,” says Brendan Buck, spokes­man for House Speak­er John Boehner. And that does mean everything ““ the new in­sur­ance mar­ket­places, the sub­sidies, the taxes, and in­di­vidu­al man­date that re­quires people to have in­sur­ance or pay a fine.

It would be hard to over­state the im­port­ance of the year ahead for both sides in the health ar­gu­ment. Re­pub­lic­ans are seek­ing an­oth­er year to stoke doubts about the health law, which is already un­pop­u­lar, and to take their re­peal plat­form in­to the 2014 midterms. If they win con­trol of the Sen­ate, they could claim a man­date to kill it.

Pres­id­ent Obama and Demo­crats, by con­trast, have been wait­ing im­pa­tiently for the open­ing of the ex­changes that are go­ing on­line Oct. 1 and are the first chance many con­sumers will have to ex­per­i­ence the law. Obama is count­ing on that firsthand con­tact to change views. As he put it Thursday, after de­scrib­ing the new sys­tem, people don’t have to take his word for it: “Go on the web­site. See for your­self what the prices are. See for your­self what the choices are. Then make up your own mind. That’s all I’m ask­ing.”

Demo­crats like to com­pare Obama­care to the Medi­care pre­scrip­tion drug pro­gram and its tra­ject­ory from res­ist­ance to ac­cept­ance. A month after it took ef­fect in Janu­ary 2006, only 23 per­cent of seni­ors in a Kais­er Fam­ily Found­a­tion poll had a fa­vor­able im­pres­sion while 45 per­cent viewed it un­fa­vor­ably. By Novem­ber 2006, that had moved to 42 per­cent fa­vor­able, 34 per­cent un­fa­vor­able. By the end of 2012, 32 mil­lion people ““ 63 per­cent of those eli­gible ““ were en­rolled in the drug plan.

There is rampant am­bi­val­ence in today’s polls. More than half the coun­try op­poses the law, while few­er than four in 10 fa­vor it. But 56 per­cent in a New York Times/CBS News poll say Con­gress should up­hold the ACA and make it work as well as pos­sible. And a new United Tech­no­lo­gies/Na­tion­al Journ­al Con­gres­sion­al Con­nec­tion poll finds a near-even split: 49 per­cent say Con­gress should keep the pro­gram, 44 per­cent say re­peal.

If the ex­changes did open but the in­di­vidu­al man­date was post­poned, ex­perts say those likely to skip buy­ing in­sur­ance are the young and the healthy ““ just the people most needed to broaden the risk pool and keep in­sur­ance rates low. Sur­ging rates would ant­ag­on­ize the pub­lic. So would the ab­sence of in­come-based sub­sidies. And if the ex­changes did not open at all, after lay­ing ground­work for big changes for the last three years, in­surers and con­sumers would be left scram­bling.

“You could think about an or­derly trans­ition back, but just stop­ping it would be chaot­ic,” says Gary Clax­ton, dir­ect­or of the Health Care Mar­ket­place Pro­ject at the Kais­er Fam­ily Found­a­tion. Among his ques­tions: Would the com­pan­ies have to re­sume un­der­writ­ing, charge high­er rates to sick people, and deny cov­er­age to some? And with many high-risk pools gone in pre­par­a­tion for the big shift, where would those people get in­sur­ance? He also notes that if in­surers lost money as a res­ult of the sud­den full stop, the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment would be on the hook to make up much of the loss, as it was the case with the Medi­care drug pro­gram.

From a polit­ic­al se­mantics stand­point, says Robert Blendon, a health policy ex­pert at Har­vard, “de­fund­ing sounds aw­ful. It sounds like you’re tak­ing money away from sick people.” A one-year delay seems more be­nign, he says, but “could have a very neg­at­ive long-term ef­fect on the vi­ab­il­ity of the law.” That makes de­fund and delay a win-win for Re­pub­lic­ans, and a test of back­bone for Demo­crats.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4471) }}

What We're Following See More »
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
14 hours ago

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
15 hours ago

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.