Senator Says Politics Have Reached Civil War Levels

.photo.left{display:none;}Sen. Tom Harkin to Congress: “We are at one of the most dangerous points in our history.”

Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa. talks about the fiscal cliff with reporters, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Friday, Dec. 28, 2012.
National Journal
Matt Berman
See more stories about...
Matt Berman
Sept. 27, 2013, 6:43 a.m.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4472) }}

As the clock ticks down to­ward a pos­sible gov­ern­ment shut­down, Sen. Tom Har­kin, D-Iowa, isn’t hold­ing back.

On the Sen­ate floor be­fore 10 a.m. Fri­day, the sen­at­or gave a speech de­scrib­ing how Amer­ic­an polit­ics have reached the level at which “a small group of will­ful men and wo­men who have a cer­tain ideo­logy” — read: the tea party and Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas — have been able to take over the con­gres­sion­al budget de­bate in the last week. “Since they can’t get their way,” Har­kin said, “they’re go­ing to cre­ate this con­fu­sion and dis­course and hope that the pub­lic will be so mixed up in who is to blame for this, that they’ll blame both sides.”

This isn’t just con­gres­sion­al busi­ness as usu­al, Har­kin said. It’s much, much more dire:

It’s dan­ger­ous. It’s very dan­ger­ous. I be­lieve, Mr. Pres­id­ent, we are at one of the most dan­ger­ous points in our his­tory right now. Every bit as dan­ger­ous as the break-up of the Uni­on be­fore the Civil War.

This isn’t the first time the sen­at­or has spoken out about the spiral­ing budget and the fight over Obama­care. Har­kin sug­ges­ted Thursday that Cruz looked “fool­ish” for his “little tirade” that las­ted from Tues­day af­ter­noon un­til Wed­nes­day morn­ing. Har­kin called out Cruz as be­ing part of “the most ex­treme tea-party wing” of his party, and for his “ideo­logy-driv­en ob­struc­tion­ism.”

Of course, it’d be a stretch to think that the United States is on the cusp of any­thing as vi­ol­ent as the Civil War. But the con­sequences of a gov­ern­ment shut­down or top­ping over the debt ceil­ing could be massively harm­ful for the U.S. eco­nomy, wheth­er you’re look­ing at the pos­sib­il­ity of a down­grade in U.S. cred­it or just the shut­down in pay­ments and ser­vices with thou­sands of gov­ern­ment em­ploy­ees out of work.

Har­kin isn’t the first to pull out a dra­mat­ic his­tor­ic­al ana­logy on the Sen­ate floor this week, either. Dur­ing his 21-plus hour speech, Cruz hearkened back to Nazi Ger­many for a com­par­is­on to “pun­dits” who think Obama­care can­not be de­feated:

If we go to the 1940s, Nazi Ger­many — look, we saw it in Bri­tain. Neville Cham­ber­lain told the Brit­ish people: Ac­cept the Nazis. Yes, they will dom­in­ate the con­tin­ent of Europe, but that is not our prob­lem. Let’s ap­pease them. Why? Be­cause it can’t be done. We can­not pos­sibly stand against them.

In Amer­ica there were voices who listened to that; I sus­pect the same pun­dits who said it couldn’t be done. If this had happened in the 1940s, we would have been listen­ing to them. Even then they would have made tele­vi­sion. They would have got­ten bey­ond the car­ri­er pi­geons and let­ters and they would have been on TV say­ing: You can­not de­feat the Ger­mans.

Sen. John Mc­Cain, R-Ar­iz., later pil­lor­ied Cruz on the floor for the com­par­is­on.

So, for those of you keep­ing track at home: With just three days to go un­til a pos­sible gov­ern­ment shut­down, we’ve already had com­par­is­ons to Nazi Ger­many and the Civil War. And we’re surely not done yet.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
6 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×